Six solutions for clinical study data sharing in Germany

Abstract Sharing clinical study data is endorsed by many funders and journals, international policy frameworks, and patients. Reuse of clinical study data demonstrably improves health research, and emerging technologies may enhance the value derived from shared data. Unfortunately, clinical research...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Evgeny Bobrov, Christina Habermehl, Daniel Strech, Tracey Weissgerber, René Bernard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02560-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849730905618251776
author Evgeny Bobrov
Christina Habermehl
Daniel Strech
Tracey Weissgerber
René Bernard
author_facet Evgeny Bobrov
Christina Habermehl
Daniel Strech
Tracey Weissgerber
René Bernard
author_sort Evgeny Bobrov
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Sharing clinical study data is endorsed by many funders and journals, international policy frameworks, and patients. Reuse of clinical study data demonstrably improves health research, and emerging technologies may enhance the value derived from shared data. Unfortunately, clinical research has failed to harness the transformative power of data sharing, and sharing remains the exception. This opinion piece focuses on the massive obstacles to sharing clinical study data in Germany, which results in very low sharing rates, wasted resources, and frustration among local researchers and international partners. We argue that this sharing crisis demands immediate and concerted action. As a remedy, we propose six feasible steps to boost clinical study data availability in Germany, derived from our experience consulting researchers and exploring solutions with international partners. Our recommendations target ethics committees, trial registries, infrastructures, and governance, while addressing data protection concerns. These measures must be flanked by further actions to foster data sharing skills and knowledge as well as, most importantly, the provision of appropriate incentives. Nevertheless, the proposed changes would be a breakthrough for clinical study data sharing in Germany, removing barriers regarding infrastructures, awareness, legal uncertainty, and responsibilities.
format Article
id doaj-art-afcafbeee7e44253836ca037aad22237
institution DOAJ
issn 1471-2288
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
spelling doaj-art-afcafbeee7e44253836ca037aad222372025-08-20T03:08:43ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882025-05-012511710.1186/s12874-025-02560-ySix solutions for clinical study data sharing in GermanyEvgeny Bobrov0Christina Habermehl1Daniel Strech2Tracey Weissgerber3René Bernard4QUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité– Universitätsmedizin BerlinQUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité– Universitätsmedizin BerlinQUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité– Universitätsmedizin BerlinQUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité– Universitätsmedizin BerlinQUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité– Universitätsmedizin BerlinAbstract Sharing clinical study data is endorsed by many funders and journals, international policy frameworks, and patients. Reuse of clinical study data demonstrably improves health research, and emerging technologies may enhance the value derived from shared data. Unfortunately, clinical research has failed to harness the transformative power of data sharing, and sharing remains the exception. This opinion piece focuses on the massive obstacles to sharing clinical study data in Germany, which results in very low sharing rates, wasted resources, and frustration among local researchers and international partners. We argue that this sharing crisis demands immediate and concerted action. As a remedy, we propose six feasible steps to boost clinical study data availability in Germany, derived from our experience consulting researchers and exploring solutions with international partners. Our recommendations target ethics committees, trial registries, infrastructures, and governance, while addressing data protection concerns. These measures must be flanked by further actions to foster data sharing skills and knowledge as well as, most importantly, the provision of appropriate incentives. Nevertheless, the proposed changes would be a breakthrough for clinical study data sharing in Germany, removing barriers regarding infrastructures, awareness, legal uncertainty, and responsibilities.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02560-y
spellingShingle Evgeny Bobrov
Christina Habermehl
Daniel Strech
Tracey Weissgerber
René Bernard
Six solutions for clinical study data sharing in Germany
BMC Medical Research Methodology
title Six solutions for clinical study data sharing in Germany
title_full Six solutions for clinical study data sharing in Germany
title_fullStr Six solutions for clinical study data sharing in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Six solutions for clinical study data sharing in Germany
title_short Six solutions for clinical study data sharing in Germany
title_sort six solutions for clinical study data sharing in germany
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02560-y
work_keys_str_mv AT evgenybobrov sixsolutionsforclinicalstudydatasharingingermany
AT christinahabermehl sixsolutionsforclinicalstudydatasharingingermany
AT danielstrech sixsolutionsforclinicalstudydatasharingingermany
AT traceyweissgerber sixsolutionsforclinicalstudydatasharingingermany
AT renebernard sixsolutionsforclinicalstudydatasharingingermany