A systematic review of studies comparing diagnostic clinical prediction rules with clinical judgment.
<h4>Background</h4>Diagnostic clinical prediction rules (CPRs) are developed to improve diagnosis or decrease diagnostic testing. Whether, and in what situations diagnostic CPRs improve upon clinical judgment is unclear.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We searched MEDLINE, Embase...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Sharon Sanders, Jenny Doust, Paul Glasziou |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128233 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Chronic kidney disease and the alternative labels used by GPs in Australia: a qualitative interview study
by: Michelle Guppy, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
The Uniform Model of the Business-Judgment Rule:
a Comparative Study in English, American, Australian and Iranian Law
by: hamid Abhary, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Judicial Development of a Business Judgment Rule in Japan
by: Vicki L Beyer
Published: (1993-01-01) -
The Statutory Business Judgment Rule: Putting the Wind into Directors’ Sails
by: Annette Greenhow
Published: (1999-01-01) -
The Clinical Judgment Of Nurses In Fall Risk Assessment
by: Fabiana Maria de Almeida, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01)