Author Correction: Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molar pulpotomy using formocresol, portland cement, and NeoMTA plus: a randomized controlled clinical trial
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Elham Farokh Gisour, Fatemeh Jahanimoghadam, Pouya Karimipour |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86736-y |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Chemistry and Bioactivity of NeoMTA Plus™ versus MTA Angelus® Root Repair Materials
by: Sawsan T. Abu Zeid, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Penetration of Biodentine, NeoMTA 2, and NeoPUTTY into dentinal tubules in primary tooth pulpotomy: a confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis
by: Merve Ozdemir, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Comparative Evaluation of Success of NeoPutty Mineral Trioxide Aggregate® with Formocresol as Pulpotomy Medicaments in Primary Molars: A Clinical Study
by: Sonu Acharya, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01) -
Biocompatibility and bioactive potential of the NeoMTA Plus endodontic bioceramic-based sealer
by: Roberto Alameda Hoshino, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Clinical and radiographic success of TheraCal versus Formocresol in primary teeth pulpotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Narjes Amrollahi, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01)