On the Validity and Benefit of Manual and Automated Drift Correction in Reading Tasks
Drift represents a common distortion that affects the position of fixations in eye tracking data. While manual correction is considered very accurate, it is considered subjective and time-consuming. On the other hand, automated correction is fast, objective, and considered less accurate. An objectiv...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Naser Al Madi |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Eye Movement Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1995-8692/18/3/17 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Advancing Dynamic-Time Warp Techniques for Correcting Eye Tracking Data in Reading Source Code
by: Naser Al Madi
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Sampling rate influences saccade detection in mobile eye tracking of a reading task
by: Alexander Leube, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01) -
Automatic Reading Method for Analog Dial Gauges with Different Measurement Ranges in Outdoor Substation Scenarios
by: Yueping Yang, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
The Self‐Calibrating Tilt Accelerometer: A Method for Observing Tilt and Correcting Drift With a Triaxial Accelerometer
by: E. K. Fredrickson, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Reading Argumentative Texts: Effects of the Presence-Absence of Connectives in Reading Comprehension and Cognitive Effort
by: Hector Limón-Fernández, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)