Inkonsistensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Syarat Minimal Usia Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden
This paper discusses several Constitutional Court decisions concerning the minimum age requirements for presidential and vice-presidential candidates that were issued on the same day. In Constitutional Court Decisions Number 29/PUU-XXI/2023, Number 51/PUU-XXI/2023, and Number 55/PUUXXI/ 2023, the Co...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Jurnal Konstitusi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/2534 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850059873975271424 |
|---|---|
| author | Selvi Christina Situmeang Ardilafiza Ardilafiza Ari Wirya Dinata |
| author_facet | Selvi Christina Situmeang Ardilafiza Ardilafiza Ari Wirya Dinata |
| author_sort | Selvi Christina Situmeang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper discusses several Constitutional Court decisions concerning the minimum age requirements for presidential and vice-presidential candidates that were issued on the same day. In Constitutional Court Decisions Number 29/PUU-XXI/2023, Number 51/PUU-XXI/2023, and Number 55/PUUXXI/ 2023, the Court consistently rejected all petitions. However, later in the afternoon, through Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023, the Court changed its stance and partially granted the request. This paper aims to analyze the differences among these decisions and the Constitutional Court’s inconsistency when addressing decisions that substantially challenge the same article. This research employs a normative legal approach using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings of this study indicate discrepancies between the decisions, procedural irregularities, and drastic shifts in the judges’ perspectives. These factors have resulted in the Constitutional Court’s inconsistency in ruling on the issue of the minimum age requirements for the President and Vice President. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-af55bb9bc99743ae8af3da60422eec18 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1829-7706 2548-1657 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Jurnal Konstitusi |
| spelling | doaj-art-af55bb9bc99743ae8af3da60422eec182025-08-20T02:50:45ZengThe Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of IndonesiaJurnal Konstitusi1829-77062548-16572024-12-0121460963410.31078/jk21452045Inkonsistensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Syarat Minimal Usia Calon Presiden dan Wakil PresidenSelvi Christina Situmeang0https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5351-1453Ardilafiza Ardilafiza1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1156-7304Ari Wirya Dinata2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8884-0762Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu, IndonesiaFakultas Hukum, Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu, IndonesiaFakultas Hukum, Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu, IndonesiaThis paper discusses several Constitutional Court decisions concerning the minimum age requirements for presidential and vice-presidential candidates that were issued on the same day. In Constitutional Court Decisions Number 29/PUU-XXI/2023, Number 51/PUU-XXI/2023, and Number 55/PUUXXI/ 2023, the Court consistently rejected all petitions. However, later in the afternoon, through Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023, the Court changed its stance and partially granted the request. This paper aims to analyze the differences among these decisions and the Constitutional Court’s inconsistency when addressing decisions that substantially challenge the same article. This research employs a normative legal approach using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings of this study indicate discrepancies between the decisions, procedural irregularities, and drastic shifts in the judges’ perspectives. These factors have resulted in the Constitutional Court’s inconsistency in ruling on the issue of the minimum age requirements for the President and Vice President.https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/2534constitutional courtopen legal policyminimum requirements for presidential and vice presidential candidates |
| spellingShingle | Selvi Christina Situmeang Ardilafiza Ardilafiza Ari Wirya Dinata Inkonsistensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Syarat Minimal Usia Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Jurnal Konstitusi constitutional court open legal policy minimum requirements for presidential and vice presidential candidates |
| title | Inkonsistensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Syarat Minimal Usia Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden |
| title_full | Inkonsistensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Syarat Minimal Usia Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden |
| title_fullStr | Inkonsistensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Syarat Minimal Usia Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden |
| title_full_unstemmed | Inkonsistensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Syarat Minimal Usia Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden |
| title_short | Inkonsistensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Syarat Minimal Usia Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden |
| title_sort | inkonsistensi mahkamah konstitusi terkait syarat minimal usia calon presiden dan wakil presiden |
| topic | constitutional court open legal policy minimum requirements for presidential and vice presidential candidates |
| url | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/2534 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT selvichristinasitumeang inkonsistensimahkamahkonstitusiterkaitsyaratminimalusiacalonpresidendanwakilpresiden AT ardilafizaardilafiza inkonsistensimahkamahkonstitusiterkaitsyaratminimalusiacalonpresidendanwakilpresiden AT ariwiryadinata inkonsistensimahkamahkonstitusiterkaitsyaratminimalusiacalonpresidendanwakilpresiden |