Testing secondary sex ratio bias hypotheses in white‐tailed deer in Mississippi, USA

Abstract Natural selection favors individuals with the highest inclusive fitness (i.e., total number of descendants). In cases where one sex is more productive, one or both parents may maximize their inclusive fitness by investing in the offspring of the more prolific sex. Such preferential producti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jane E. Dentinger, Lacy A. Dolan Todt, Emma A. Schultz, James N. Helferich, Stephen Demarais, Randy W. DeYoung, William T. McKinley, Bronson K. Strickland, Melanie R. Boudreau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-10-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70296
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850132281102958592
author Jane E. Dentinger
Lacy A. Dolan Todt
Emma A. Schultz
James N. Helferich
Stephen Demarais
Randy W. DeYoung
William T. McKinley
Bronson K. Strickland
Melanie R. Boudreau
author_facet Jane E. Dentinger
Lacy A. Dolan Todt
Emma A. Schultz
James N. Helferich
Stephen Demarais
Randy W. DeYoung
William T. McKinley
Bronson K. Strickland
Melanie R. Boudreau
author_sort Jane E. Dentinger
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Natural selection favors individuals with the highest inclusive fitness (i.e., total number of descendants). In cases where one sex is more productive, one or both parents may maximize their inclusive fitness by investing in the offspring of the more prolific sex. Such preferential production can lead to skewed sex ratios at various life history stages, including at birth, resulting in secondary sex ratio bias. Several competing hypotheses have been proposed to explain observed variation in secondary sex ratios including Fisher's frequency dependence and two hypotheses related to maternal condition: Trivers–Willard and the local resource hypotheses. Although it has been shown that maternal condition can influence the number of offspring produced in white‐tailed deer, there is no consensus as to which of the hypotheses drives sex ratio bias in wild populations. Using a spatiotemporally extensive dataset of pregnant white‐tailed deer from Mississippi, USA, we examined fetal sex ratio in relation to the Fisherian frequency‐dependence hypothesis and hypotheses related to maternal condition. While there was a male‐sex ratio bias in pregnant females that reduced in intensity with the number of offspring, there was no support for condition‐related hypotheses. Instead, secondary sex ratios for white‐tailed deer in Mississippi were nearly consistent with Fisherian frequency dependence. Our findings add to the body of literature on secondary sex biases in white‐tailed deer and help inform sex bias ratios for a southern population of a cervid of management importance in the US.
format Article
id doaj-art-af44c7391bfb479f9208f24cacf49de4
institution OA Journals
issn 2045-7758
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj-art-af44c7391bfb479f9208f24cacf49de42025-08-20T02:32:14ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582024-10-011410n/an/a10.1002/ece3.70296Testing secondary sex ratio bias hypotheses in white‐tailed deer in Mississippi, USAJane E. Dentinger0Lacy A. Dolan Todt1Emma A. Schultz2James N. Helferich3Stephen Demarais4Randy W. DeYoung5William T. McKinley6Bronson K. Strickland7Melanie R. Boudreau8Department of Wildlife, Fisheries & Aquaculture Mississippi State University Mississippi State Mississippi USADepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries & Aquaculture Mississippi State University Mississippi State Mississippi USADepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries & Aquaculture Mississippi State University Mississippi State Mississippi USADepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries & Aquaculture Mississippi State University Mississippi State Mississippi USADepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries & Aquaculture Mississippi State University Mississippi State Mississippi USACaesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University‐Kingsville Kingsville Texas USAMississippi Department of Wildlife Fisheries and Parks Jackson Mississippi USADepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries & Aquaculture Mississippi State University Mississippi State Mississippi USADepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries & Aquaculture Mississippi State University Mississippi State Mississippi USAAbstract Natural selection favors individuals with the highest inclusive fitness (i.e., total number of descendants). In cases where one sex is more productive, one or both parents may maximize their inclusive fitness by investing in the offspring of the more prolific sex. Such preferential production can lead to skewed sex ratios at various life history stages, including at birth, resulting in secondary sex ratio bias. Several competing hypotheses have been proposed to explain observed variation in secondary sex ratios including Fisher's frequency dependence and two hypotheses related to maternal condition: Trivers–Willard and the local resource hypotheses. Although it has been shown that maternal condition can influence the number of offspring produced in white‐tailed deer, there is no consensus as to which of the hypotheses drives sex ratio bias in wild populations. Using a spatiotemporally extensive dataset of pregnant white‐tailed deer from Mississippi, USA, we examined fetal sex ratio in relation to the Fisherian frequency‐dependence hypothesis and hypotheses related to maternal condition. While there was a male‐sex ratio bias in pregnant females that reduced in intensity with the number of offspring, there was no support for condition‐related hypotheses. Instead, secondary sex ratios for white‐tailed deer in Mississippi were nearly consistent with Fisherian frequency dependence. Our findings add to the body of literature on secondary sex biases in white‐tailed deer and help inform sex bias ratios for a southern population of a cervid of management importance in the US.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70296Fisherian frequency dependencelocal resource competition hypothesisOdocoileus virginianusTrivers–Willard hypothesis
spellingShingle Jane E. Dentinger
Lacy A. Dolan Todt
Emma A. Schultz
James N. Helferich
Stephen Demarais
Randy W. DeYoung
William T. McKinley
Bronson K. Strickland
Melanie R. Boudreau
Testing secondary sex ratio bias hypotheses in white‐tailed deer in Mississippi, USA
Ecology and Evolution
Fisherian frequency dependence
local resource competition hypothesis
Odocoileus virginianus
Trivers–Willard hypothesis
title Testing secondary sex ratio bias hypotheses in white‐tailed deer in Mississippi, USA
title_full Testing secondary sex ratio bias hypotheses in white‐tailed deer in Mississippi, USA
title_fullStr Testing secondary sex ratio bias hypotheses in white‐tailed deer in Mississippi, USA
title_full_unstemmed Testing secondary sex ratio bias hypotheses in white‐tailed deer in Mississippi, USA
title_short Testing secondary sex ratio bias hypotheses in white‐tailed deer in Mississippi, USA
title_sort testing secondary sex ratio bias hypotheses in white tailed deer in mississippi usa
topic Fisherian frequency dependence
local resource competition hypothesis
Odocoileus virginianus
Trivers–Willard hypothesis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70296
work_keys_str_mv AT janeedentinger testingsecondarysexratiobiashypothesesinwhitetaileddeerinmississippiusa
AT lacyadolantodt testingsecondarysexratiobiashypothesesinwhitetaileddeerinmississippiusa
AT emmaaschultz testingsecondarysexratiobiashypothesesinwhitetaileddeerinmississippiusa
AT jamesnhelferich testingsecondarysexratiobiashypothesesinwhitetaileddeerinmississippiusa
AT stephendemarais testingsecondarysexratiobiashypothesesinwhitetaileddeerinmississippiusa
AT randywdeyoung testingsecondarysexratiobiashypothesesinwhitetaileddeerinmississippiusa
AT williamtmckinley testingsecondarysexratiobiashypothesesinwhitetaileddeerinmississippiusa
AT bronsonkstrickland testingsecondarysexratiobiashypothesesinwhitetaileddeerinmississippiusa
AT melanierboudreau testingsecondarysexratiobiashypothesesinwhitetaileddeerinmississippiusa