Algorithms for the Capture and Adjudication of Prevalent and Incident Diabetes in UK Biobank.
<h4>Objectives</h4>UK Biobank is a UK-wide cohort of 502,655 people aged 40-69, recruited from National Health Service registrants between 2006-10, with healthcare data linkage. Type 2 diabetes is a key exposure and outcome. We developed algorithms to define prevalent and incident diabet...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0162388&type=printable |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850232535040131072 |
|---|---|
| author | Sophie V Eastwood Rohini Mathur Mark Atkinson Sinead Brophy Cathie Sudlow Robin Flaig Simon de Lusignan Naomi Allen Nishi Chaturvedi |
| author_facet | Sophie V Eastwood Rohini Mathur Mark Atkinson Sinead Brophy Cathie Sudlow Robin Flaig Simon de Lusignan Naomi Allen Nishi Chaturvedi |
| author_sort | Sophie V Eastwood |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Objectives</h4>UK Biobank is a UK-wide cohort of 502,655 people aged 40-69, recruited from National Health Service registrants between 2006-10, with healthcare data linkage. Type 2 diabetes is a key exposure and outcome. We developed algorithms to define prevalent and incident diabetes for UK Biobank. The algorithms will be implemented by UK Biobank and their results made available to researchers on request.<h4>Methods</h4>We used UK Biobank self-reported medical history and medication to assign prevalent diabetes and type, and tested this against linked primary and secondary care data in Welsh UK Biobank participants. Additionally, we derived and tested algorithms for incident diabetes using linked primary and secondary care data in the English Clinical Practice Research Datalink, and ran these on secondary care data in UK Biobank.<h4>Results and significance</h4>For prevalent diabetes, 0.001% and 0.002% of people classified as "diabetes unlikely" in UK Biobank had evidence of diabetes in their primary or secondary care record respectively. Of those classified as "probable" type 2 diabetes, 75% and 96% had specific type 2 diabetes codes in their primary and secondary care records. For incidence, 95% of people with the type 2 diabetes-specific C10F Read code in primary care had corroborative evidence of diabetes from medications, blood testing or diabetes specific process of care codes. Only 41% of people identified with type 2 diabetes in primary care had secondary care evidence of type 2 diabetes. In contrast, of incident cases using ICD-10 type 2 diabetes specific codes in secondary care, 77% had corroborative evidence of diabetes in primary care. We suggest our definition of prevalent diabetes from UK Biobank baseline data has external validity, and recommend that specific primary care Read codes should be used for incident diabetes to ensure precision. Secondary care data should be used for incident diabetes with caution, as around half of all cases are missed, and a quarter have no corroborative evidence of diabetes in primary care. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-af24075b5bbc4fe69da4453eb3c67ac8 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj-art-af24075b5bbc4fe69da4453eb3c67ac82025-08-20T02:03:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01119e016238810.1371/journal.pone.0162388Algorithms for the Capture and Adjudication of Prevalent and Incident Diabetes in UK Biobank.Sophie V EastwoodRohini MathurMark AtkinsonSinead BrophyCathie SudlowRobin FlaigSimon de LusignanNaomi AllenNishi Chaturvedi<h4>Objectives</h4>UK Biobank is a UK-wide cohort of 502,655 people aged 40-69, recruited from National Health Service registrants between 2006-10, with healthcare data linkage. Type 2 diabetes is a key exposure and outcome. We developed algorithms to define prevalent and incident diabetes for UK Biobank. The algorithms will be implemented by UK Biobank and their results made available to researchers on request.<h4>Methods</h4>We used UK Biobank self-reported medical history and medication to assign prevalent diabetes and type, and tested this against linked primary and secondary care data in Welsh UK Biobank participants. Additionally, we derived and tested algorithms for incident diabetes using linked primary and secondary care data in the English Clinical Practice Research Datalink, and ran these on secondary care data in UK Biobank.<h4>Results and significance</h4>For prevalent diabetes, 0.001% and 0.002% of people classified as "diabetes unlikely" in UK Biobank had evidence of diabetes in their primary or secondary care record respectively. Of those classified as "probable" type 2 diabetes, 75% and 96% had specific type 2 diabetes codes in their primary and secondary care records. For incidence, 95% of people with the type 2 diabetes-specific C10F Read code in primary care had corroborative evidence of diabetes from medications, blood testing or diabetes specific process of care codes. Only 41% of people identified with type 2 diabetes in primary care had secondary care evidence of type 2 diabetes. In contrast, of incident cases using ICD-10 type 2 diabetes specific codes in secondary care, 77% had corroborative evidence of diabetes in primary care. We suggest our definition of prevalent diabetes from UK Biobank baseline data has external validity, and recommend that specific primary care Read codes should be used for incident diabetes to ensure precision. Secondary care data should be used for incident diabetes with caution, as around half of all cases are missed, and a quarter have no corroborative evidence of diabetes in primary care.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0162388&type=printable |
| spellingShingle | Sophie V Eastwood Rohini Mathur Mark Atkinson Sinead Brophy Cathie Sudlow Robin Flaig Simon de Lusignan Naomi Allen Nishi Chaturvedi Algorithms for the Capture and Adjudication of Prevalent and Incident Diabetes in UK Biobank. PLoS ONE |
| title | Algorithms for the Capture and Adjudication of Prevalent and Incident Diabetes in UK Biobank. |
| title_full | Algorithms for the Capture and Adjudication of Prevalent and Incident Diabetes in UK Biobank. |
| title_fullStr | Algorithms for the Capture and Adjudication of Prevalent and Incident Diabetes in UK Biobank. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Algorithms for the Capture and Adjudication of Prevalent and Incident Diabetes in UK Biobank. |
| title_short | Algorithms for the Capture and Adjudication of Prevalent and Incident Diabetes in UK Biobank. |
| title_sort | algorithms for the capture and adjudication of prevalent and incident diabetes in uk biobank |
| url | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0162388&type=printable |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sophieveastwood algorithmsforthecaptureandadjudicationofprevalentandincidentdiabetesinukbiobank AT rohinimathur algorithmsforthecaptureandadjudicationofprevalentandincidentdiabetesinukbiobank AT markatkinson algorithmsforthecaptureandadjudicationofprevalentandincidentdiabetesinukbiobank AT sineadbrophy algorithmsforthecaptureandadjudicationofprevalentandincidentdiabetesinukbiobank AT cathiesudlow algorithmsforthecaptureandadjudicationofprevalentandincidentdiabetesinukbiobank AT robinflaig algorithmsforthecaptureandadjudicationofprevalentandincidentdiabetesinukbiobank AT simondelusignan algorithmsforthecaptureandadjudicationofprevalentandincidentdiabetesinukbiobank AT naomiallen algorithmsforthecaptureandadjudicationofprevalentandincidentdiabetesinukbiobank AT nishichaturvedi algorithmsforthecaptureandadjudicationofprevalentandincidentdiabetesinukbiobank |