The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma
In this paper we present and critically evaluate a participatory mapping project called the Map of Water Conflicts in Andalusia (Spain) led by researchers at the University of Seville from 2017 to 2019. According to the available literature, projects of this nature denote initial enthusiasm, followe...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Ecology and Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol30/iss2/art29 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850108808246853632 |
|---|---|
| author | Belen Pedregal Pamela E. Degele |
| author_facet | Belen Pedregal Pamela E. Degele |
| author_sort | Belen Pedregal |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this paper we present and critically evaluate a participatory mapping project called the Map of Water Conflicts in Andalusia (Spain) led by researchers at the University of Seville from 2017 to 2019. According to the available literature, projects of this nature denote initial enthusiasm, followed by decline and abandonment within a period of approximately five years. At the crossroads of the Map’s disappearance, we critically analyze the project expectations and outcomes while addressing the challenges of sustaining co-production interest and validity over time.
Our evaluation uses available information produced throughout the project to contrast the project’s officially defined goals and participant expectations with the project outcomes. The results are then discussed from a process-based perspective in relation to the lifecycle of boundary objects, with particular attention to the role of the researchers as influential actors in contributing to the generation, sustainability, and relevance of co-production projects.
Three phases were identified in the project lifecycle, interpretive flexibility, standardization, and infrastructure creation, with critical transitional moments that challenge its sustainability and even pose a “survival dilemma” for the project. We conclude that to awaken from the “collaborative dream,” it is essential to consider the dynamic and conflictive nature of co-production projects and the ongoing self-examination within project teams. Goals and expected outcomes should be designed to align with the project’s transition through different stages, which are, in turn, determined by political-institutional contexts and specific power relations. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-af1fa1ce01b246f4a694989a5363b71e |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1708-3087 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | Resilience Alliance |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecology and Society |
| spelling | doaj-art-af1fa1ce01b246f4a694989a5363b71e2025-08-20T02:38:15ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872025-06-013022910.5751/ES-16129-30022916129The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemmaBelen Pedregal0Pamela E. Degele1Universidad de SevillaNational Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET)In this paper we present and critically evaluate a participatory mapping project called the Map of Water Conflicts in Andalusia (Spain) led by researchers at the University of Seville from 2017 to 2019. According to the available literature, projects of this nature denote initial enthusiasm, followed by decline and abandonment within a period of approximately five years. At the crossroads of the Map’s disappearance, we critically analyze the project expectations and outcomes while addressing the challenges of sustaining co-production interest and validity over time. Our evaluation uses available information produced throughout the project to contrast the project’s officially defined goals and participant expectations with the project outcomes. The results are then discussed from a process-based perspective in relation to the lifecycle of boundary objects, with particular attention to the role of the researchers as influential actors in contributing to the generation, sustainability, and relevance of co-production projects. Three phases were identified in the project lifecycle, interpretive flexibility, standardization, and infrastructure creation, with critical transitional moments that challenge its sustainability and even pose a “survival dilemma” for the project. We conclude that to awaken from the “collaborative dream,” it is essential to consider the dynamic and conflictive nature of co-production projects and the ongoing self-examination within project teams. Goals and expected outcomes should be designed to align with the project’s transition through different stages, which are, in turn, determined by political-institutional contexts and specific power relations.https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol30/iss2/art29boundary objectsknowledge co-productionparticipatory mappingproject life cyclewater conflicts |
| spellingShingle | Belen Pedregal Pamela E. Degele The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma Ecology and Society boundary objects knowledge co-production participatory mapping project life cycle water conflicts |
| title | The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma |
| title_full | The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma |
| title_fullStr | The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma |
| title_full_unstemmed | The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma |
| title_short | The collaborative dream: the life cycle of knowledge co-production projects and the survival dilemma |
| title_sort | collaborative dream the life cycle of knowledge co production projects and the survival dilemma |
| topic | boundary objects knowledge co-production participatory mapping project life cycle water conflicts |
| url | https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol30/iss2/art29 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT belenpedregal thecollaborativedreamthelifecycleofknowledgecoproductionprojectsandthesurvivaldilemma AT pamelaedegele thecollaborativedreamthelifecycleofknowledgecoproductionprojectsandthesurvivaldilemma AT belenpedregal collaborativedreamthelifecycleofknowledgecoproductionprojectsandthesurvivaldilemma AT pamelaedegele collaborativedreamthelifecycleofknowledgecoproductionprojectsandthesurvivaldilemma |