The learning curve for hood‐sparing robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy: A single‐surgeon experience

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to assess the impact of anterior hood‐sparing robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with posterior‐anterior reconstruction in a single‐surgeon series by analysing oncological and functional continence outcomes. Patients and Methods We carried out a cohort c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keith R. S. Simpson, Jamie Krishnan, Linda Taylor, Alan McNeill, Daniel W. Good
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:BJUI Compass
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.463
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832576708212948992
author Keith R. S. Simpson
Jamie Krishnan
Linda Taylor
Alan McNeill
Daniel W. Good
author_facet Keith R. S. Simpson
Jamie Krishnan
Linda Taylor
Alan McNeill
Daniel W. Good
author_sort Keith R. S. Simpson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives This study aimed to assess the impact of anterior hood‐sparing robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with posterior‐anterior reconstruction in a single‐surgeon series by analysing oncological and functional continence outcomes. Patients and Methods We carried out a cohort comparison study of a prospectively collected single‐surgeon series. The surgeon was an ‘in‐training’ fellowship trained surgeon in their first 2 years of independent practice. There were three cohorts identified from electronic and scanned paper operation notes. The first cohort of standard anterior RARP (no hood sparing) included initial patients and any patient in the consecutive series who had completed 3 month FU after RARP. The second cohort was hemi‐hood‐sparing RARP again within the consecutive database of patients and lastly full‐hood‐sparing RARP. Early continence was defined by patients reporting being ‘dry’ and with 0 pad or 1 confidence/security pad. Data was collected in an Excel spreadsheet, and SPSS was used to assess distribution with non‐parametric data being analysed using a Mann Whitney U test and parametric data with an unpaired t‐test. Results We identified 174 patients from March 2020 to February 2022 who were operated on. Full pathology and 6‐week follow‐up pad use data was available for all patients. At 12 months, some data for EPIC‐26 was not available (lack of response/clinic non‐attendance). The results demonstrate doubling in early continence to over 75% at 6‐week follow‐up with comparable positive margin rates. This difference was statistically significantly better in the dorsal venous complex RARP sparing group in comparison to standard RARP (p < 0.001). Conclusion Anterior hood‐sparing RARP with anterior reconstruction is a modification to the standard anterior RARP approach with a short learning curve which provides patients with better early and late continence without compromise to oncological outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-af1ac7074f804f0db919204383543a52
institution Kabale University
issn 2688-4526
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series BJUI Compass
spelling doaj-art-af1ac7074f804f0db919204383543a522025-01-31T00:14:32ZengWileyBJUI Compass2688-45262025-01-0161n/an/a10.1002/bco2.463The learning curve for hood‐sparing robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy: A single‐surgeon experienceKeith R. S. Simpson0Jamie Krishnan1Linda Taylor2Alan McNeill3Daniel W. Good4Urology Department Western General Hospital Edinburgh UKUrology Department Western General Hospital Edinburgh UKUrology Department Western General Hospital Edinburgh UKUrology Department Western General Hospital Edinburgh UKUrology Department Western General Hospital Edinburgh UKAbstract Objectives This study aimed to assess the impact of anterior hood‐sparing robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with posterior‐anterior reconstruction in a single‐surgeon series by analysing oncological and functional continence outcomes. Patients and Methods We carried out a cohort comparison study of a prospectively collected single‐surgeon series. The surgeon was an ‘in‐training’ fellowship trained surgeon in their first 2 years of independent practice. There were three cohorts identified from electronic and scanned paper operation notes. The first cohort of standard anterior RARP (no hood sparing) included initial patients and any patient in the consecutive series who had completed 3 month FU after RARP. The second cohort was hemi‐hood‐sparing RARP again within the consecutive database of patients and lastly full‐hood‐sparing RARP. Early continence was defined by patients reporting being ‘dry’ and with 0 pad or 1 confidence/security pad. Data was collected in an Excel spreadsheet, and SPSS was used to assess distribution with non‐parametric data being analysed using a Mann Whitney U test and parametric data with an unpaired t‐test. Results We identified 174 patients from March 2020 to February 2022 who were operated on. Full pathology and 6‐week follow‐up pad use data was available for all patients. At 12 months, some data for EPIC‐26 was not available (lack of response/clinic non‐attendance). The results demonstrate doubling in early continence to over 75% at 6‐week follow‐up with comparable positive margin rates. This difference was statistically significantly better in the dorsal venous complex RARP sparing group in comparison to standard RARP (p < 0.001). Conclusion Anterior hood‐sparing RARP with anterior reconstruction is a modification to the standard anterior RARP approach with a short learning curve which provides patients with better early and late continence without compromise to oncological outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.463hood sparinglearning curveRARProbot‐assisted radical prostatectomyurinary incontinence
spellingShingle Keith R. S. Simpson
Jamie Krishnan
Linda Taylor
Alan McNeill
Daniel W. Good
The learning curve for hood‐sparing robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy: A single‐surgeon experience
BJUI Compass
hood sparing
learning curve
RARP
robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy
urinary incontinence
title The learning curve for hood‐sparing robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy: A single‐surgeon experience
title_full The learning curve for hood‐sparing robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy: A single‐surgeon experience
title_fullStr The learning curve for hood‐sparing robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy: A single‐surgeon experience
title_full_unstemmed The learning curve for hood‐sparing robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy: A single‐surgeon experience
title_short The learning curve for hood‐sparing robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy: A single‐surgeon experience
title_sort learning curve for hood sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy a single surgeon experience
topic hood sparing
learning curve
RARP
robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy
urinary incontinence
url https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.463
work_keys_str_mv AT keithrssimpson thelearningcurveforhoodsparingroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglesurgeonexperience
AT jamiekrishnan thelearningcurveforhoodsparingroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglesurgeonexperience
AT lindataylor thelearningcurveforhoodsparingroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglesurgeonexperience
AT alanmcneill thelearningcurveforhoodsparingroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglesurgeonexperience
AT danielwgood thelearningcurveforhoodsparingroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglesurgeonexperience
AT keithrssimpson learningcurveforhoodsparingroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglesurgeonexperience
AT jamiekrishnan learningcurveforhoodsparingroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglesurgeonexperience
AT lindataylor learningcurveforhoodsparingroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglesurgeonexperience
AT alanmcneill learningcurveforhoodsparingroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglesurgeonexperience
AT danielwgood learningcurveforhoodsparingroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglesurgeonexperience