Improving the tray footprint of retention and sustainable specific suspension (3S) packaging

Abstract One of the main issues with retention and suspension packaging is that objects tend to shift toward the sides inside the cardboard box due to impacts, reducing the available cushioning distance during subsequent impacts from the same direction. When a horizontal wrapper is employed to secur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ward Nica, Thomas Hellin, Peter Slaets, Marc Juwet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2024-11-01
Series:Discover Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06272-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850163298761179136
author Ward Nica
Thomas Hellin
Peter Slaets
Marc Juwet
author_facet Ward Nica
Thomas Hellin
Peter Slaets
Marc Juwet
author_sort Ward Nica
collection DOAJ
description Abstract One of the main issues with retention and suspension packaging is that objects tend to shift toward the sides inside the cardboard box due to impacts, reducing the available cushioning distance during subsequent impacts from the same direction. When a horizontal wrapper is employed to secure objects on a cardboard tray, various modifications are commonly made to address this issue in wrapped packaging. These modifications include adding friction foam underneath the object and altering the tray shape. A special case of wrapped packaging is 3S packaging, which stands for sustainable specific suspension packaging, which focuses on applying this stretch wrapping principle to e-commerce. Previous studies on 3S packaging have shown that a plain rectangular tray can only protect lightweight goods from multiple consecutive drops in the same direction, and increasing the wrapping density does not extend the applicable weight range. This study investigates alternatives for increasing wrapping density, demonstrating that adding friction to the tray is undesirable. Instead, a central narrowing proves to be the most promising option to ensure that the object remains protected from all sides during sequential impacts and expands the applicable range of the wrapped packaging methods. Additionally, incorporating steps into the transition of the central narrowing is beneficial for both the wrapping process and the shock absorption properties of these stretch-wrapped packaging methods. These findings allow for a reduction in material usage, better shock absorption, and faster packaging.
format Article
id doaj-art-af14ba8006394e46bfd3ce84878439ac
institution OA Journals
issn 3004-9261
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Discover Applied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-af14ba8006394e46bfd3ce84878439ac2025-08-20T02:22:20ZengSpringerDiscover Applied Sciences3004-92612024-11-0161212510.1007/s42452-024-06272-8Improving the tray footprint of retention and sustainable specific suspension (3S) packagingWard Nica0Thomas Hellin1Peter Slaets2Marc Juwet3Engineering and Technology Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven ScienceEngineering and Technology Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven ScienceEngineering and Technology Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven ScienceEngineering and Technology Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven ScienceAbstract One of the main issues with retention and suspension packaging is that objects tend to shift toward the sides inside the cardboard box due to impacts, reducing the available cushioning distance during subsequent impacts from the same direction. When a horizontal wrapper is employed to secure objects on a cardboard tray, various modifications are commonly made to address this issue in wrapped packaging. These modifications include adding friction foam underneath the object and altering the tray shape. A special case of wrapped packaging is 3S packaging, which stands for sustainable specific suspension packaging, which focuses on applying this stretch wrapping principle to e-commerce. Previous studies on 3S packaging have shown that a plain rectangular tray can only protect lightweight goods from multiple consecutive drops in the same direction, and increasing the wrapping density does not extend the applicable weight range. This study investigates alternatives for increasing wrapping density, demonstrating that adding friction to the tray is undesirable. Instead, a central narrowing proves to be the most promising option to ensure that the object remains protected from all sides during sequential impacts and expands the applicable range of the wrapped packaging methods. Additionally, incorporating steps into the transition of the central narrowing is beneficial for both the wrapping process and the shock absorption properties of these stretch-wrapped packaging methods. These findings allow for a reduction in material usage, better shock absorption, and faster packaging.https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06272-8Retention packagingSuspension packaging3S packagingStretch filmStretch wrapE-commerce
spellingShingle Ward Nica
Thomas Hellin
Peter Slaets
Marc Juwet
Improving the tray footprint of retention and sustainable specific suspension (3S) packaging
Discover Applied Sciences
Retention packaging
Suspension packaging
3S packaging
Stretch film
Stretch wrap
E-commerce
title Improving the tray footprint of retention and sustainable specific suspension (3S) packaging
title_full Improving the tray footprint of retention and sustainable specific suspension (3S) packaging
title_fullStr Improving the tray footprint of retention and sustainable specific suspension (3S) packaging
title_full_unstemmed Improving the tray footprint of retention and sustainable specific suspension (3S) packaging
title_short Improving the tray footprint of retention and sustainable specific suspension (3S) packaging
title_sort improving the tray footprint of retention and sustainable specific suspension 3s packaging
topic Retention packaging
Suspension packaging
3S packaging
Stretch film
Stretch wrap
E-commerce
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06272-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wardnica improvingthetrayfootprintofretentionandsustainablespecificsuspension3spackaging
AT thomashellin improvingthetrayfootprintofretentionandsustainablespecificsuspension3spackaging
AT peterslaets improvingthetrayfootprintofretentionandsustainablespecificsuspension3spackaging
AT marcjuwet improvingthetrayfootprintofretentionandsustainablespecificsuspension3spackaging