Ahmed Glaucoma Valves versus EX-PRESS Devices in Glaucoma Secondary to Silicone Oil Emulsification

Objective. To evaluate and compare the clinical effects of Ahmed glaucoma valves (AGVs) and EX-PRESS implants on glaucoma secondary to silicone oil (SO) emulsification. Methods. A retrospective case-series study was designed. A total of 23 eyes with late intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation secondar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhuyun Qian, Kai Xu, Xiangmei Kong, Huan Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8539689
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832548779572592640
author Zhuyun Qian
Kai Xu
Xiangmei Kong
Huan Xu
author_facet Zhuyun Qian
Kai Xu
Xiangmei Kong
Huan Xu
author_sort Zhuyun Qian
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To evaluate and compare the clinical effects of Ahmed glaucoma valves (AGVs) and EX-PRESS implants on glaucoma secondary to silicone oil (SO) emulsification. Methods. A retrospective case-series study was designed. A total of 23 eyes with late intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation secondary to SO emulsification were included in the study. Antiglaucoma surgery with implantation of AGVs or EX-PRESS devices was performed. Pre- and postoperative ocular parameters were recorded at each visit during a 1-year follow-up period. The rates of complete success (IOP < 21 mmHg without medication) and qualified success (IOP < 21 mmHg with ≤3 glaucoma medications) were analyzed. Results. A total of 14 eyes underwent AGV implantation, and 9 underwent EX-PRESS implantation. The mean IOP and number of medications used at the last follow-up decreased significantly compared with that before surgery (P<0.001). The total success rate for all eyes including complete success (7/23) and qualified success (7/23) was 60.9% (14/23) at 1 year. The total success rate in the AGV group was 78.6% (11/14), whereas it was 33.3% (3/9) in the EX-PRESS group; the difference between the 2 groups was significant (P<0.05). Conclusion. For glaucoma secondary to SO emulsification, glaucoma implants could be effective at lowering IOP, and AGVs might produce better outcomes than EX-PRESS devices.
format Article
id doaj-art-af132e92842340afaa79444a4ff43b66
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-af132e92842340afaa79444a4ff43b662025-02-03T06:13:11ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582018-01-01201810.1155/2018/85396898539689Ahmed Glaucoma Valves versus EX-PRESS Devices in Glaucoma Secondary to Silicone Oil EmulsificationZhuyun Qian0Kai Xu1Xiangmei Kong2Huan Xu3Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaObjective. To evaluate and compare the clinical effects of Ahmed glaucoma valves (AGVs) and EX-PRESS implants on glaucoma secondary to silicone oil (SO) emulsification. Methods. A retrospective case-series study was designed. A total of 23 eyes with late intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation secondary to SO emulsification were included in the study. Antiglaucoma surgery with implantation of AGVs or EX-PRESS devices was performed. Pre- and postoperative ocular parameters were recorded at each visit during a 1-year follow-up period. The rates of complete success (IOP < 21 mmHg without medication) and qualified success (IOP < 21 mmHg with ≤3 glaucoma medications) were analyzed. Results. A total of 14 eyes underwent AGV implantation, and 9 underwent EX-PRESS implantation. The mean IOP and number of medications used at the last follow-up decreased significantly compared with that before surgery (P<0.001). The total success rate for all eyes including complete success (7/23) and qualified success (7/23) was 60.9% (14/23) at 1 year. The total success rate in the AGV group was 78.6% (11/14), whereas it was 33.3% (3/9) in the EX-PRESS group; the difference between the 2 groups was significant (P<0.05). Conclusion. For glaucoma secondary to SO emulsification, glaucoma implants could be effective at lowering IOP, and AGVs might produce better outcomes than EX-PRESS devices.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8539689
spellingShingle Zhuyun Qian
Kai Xu
Xiangmei Kong
Huan Xu
Ahmed Glaucoma Valves versus EX-PRESS Devices in Glaucoma Secondary to Silicone Oil Emulsification
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Ahmed Glaucoma Valves versus EX-PRESS Devices in Glaucoma Secondary to Silicone Oil Emulsification
title_full Ahmed Glaucoma Valves versus EX-PRESS Devices in Glaucoma Secondary to Silicone Oil Emulsification
title_fullStr Ahmed Glaucoma Valves versus EX-PRESS Devices in Glaucoma Secondary to Silicone Oil Emulsification
title_full_unstemmed Ahmed Glaucoma Valves versus EX-PRESS Devices in Glaucoma Secondary to Silicone Oil Emulsification
title_short Ahmed Glaucoma Valves versus EX-PRESS Devices in Glaucoma Secondary to Silicone Oil Emulsification
title_sort ahmed glaucoma valves versus ex press devices in glaucoma secondary to silicone oil emulsification
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8539689
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuyunqian ahmedglaucomavalvesversusexpressdevicesinglaucomasecondarytosiliconeoilemulsification
AT kaixu ahmedglaucomavalvesversusexpressdevicesinglaucomasecondarytosiliconeoilemulsification
AT xiangmeikong ahmedglaucomavalvesversusexpressdevicesinglaucomasecondarytosiliconeoilemulsification
AT huanxu ahmedglaucomavalvesversusexpressdevicesinglaucomasecondarytosiliconeoilemulsification