Optimal Design of Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Considering Various Sources of Uncertainty
The automotive industry is experiencing a period of transition from traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles to electric vehicles. Although electric machines have always been used in many applications, they are generally designed neglecting the sources of uncertainty, even such uncertai...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | World Electric Vehicle Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2032-6653/16/2/79 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The automotive industry is experiencing a period of transition from traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles to electric vehicles. Although electric machines have always been used in many applications, they are generally designed neglecting the sources of uncertainty, even such uncertainty can lead to significant deterioration of the motor performance. The aim of this paper is to compare the results obtained from the multi-objective optimization of an interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) using a robust approach versus a deterministic one. Unlike other studies in the literature, this research simultaneously considers different sources of uncertainty, such as geometric parameters, magnet properties, and operating temperature, to assess the variability of electric motor performance. Different designs of a 48 slot–8 pole motor are simulated with finite element analysis, then the outputs are used to train artificial neural networks that are employed to find the optimal design with different approaches. The method incorporates an innovative use of the neural network-based variance estimation (NNVE) technique to efficiently calculate the standard deviation of the objective functions. Finally, the results of the robust optimization are compared with those of the deterministic optimization. Due to the small margin of improvement in robustness, both methods lead to similar results. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2032-6653 |