The Problem of Evaluation in the Rhetorical Criticism

The field of the communication sciences is a hybrid field with various influences that can be observed in the research methods that are used: the quantitative-scientific and qualitative-interpretive methods. Rhetorical criticism as a qualitative research in the field of communication calls for its o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cosmin-Constantin BĂIAȘ
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Politehnica University of Timisoara 2020-10-01
Series:Scientific Bulletin of the Politehnica University of Timişoara: Transactions on Modern Languages
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sc.upt.ro/attachments/article/408/02_Baias.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849249028095606784
author Cosmin-Constantin BĂIAȘ
author_facet Cosmin-Constantin BĂIAȘ
author_sort Cosmin-Constantin BĂIAȘ
collection DOAJ
description The field of the communication sciences is a hybrid field with various influences that can be observed in the research methods that are used: the quantitative-scientific and qualitative-interpretive methods. Rhetorical criticism as a qualitative research in the field of communication calls for its own evaluation standards. Our aim is to clarify, through a meta-analysis, the evaluation criteria proposed by different authors and the standards, after which an essay of the rhetorical criticism can be appreciated. We claim that a work of the rhetorical criticism is not just an exercise of creativity and originality, but rather a way of persuasive argumentation.
format Article
id doaj-art-aebfdff379e04c9d96613cb644ae5732
institution Kabale University
issn 1583-7467
1583-7467
language deu
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Politehnica University of Timisoara
record_format Article
series Scientific Bulletin of the Politehnica University of Timişoara: Transactions on Modern Languages
spelling doaj-art-aebfdff379e04c9d96613cb644ae57322025-08-20T03:57:43ZdeuPolitehnica University of TimisoaraScientific Bulletin of the Politehnica University of Timişoara: Transactions on Modern Languages1583-74671583-74672020-10-011911522The Problem of Evaluation in the Rhetorical CriticismCosmin-Constantin BĂIAȘ0Politehnica University of TimisoaraThe field of the communication sciences is a hybrid field with various influences that can be observed in the research methods that are used: the quantitative-scientific and qualitative-interpretive methods. Rhetorical criticism as a qualitative research in the field of communication calls for its own evaluation standards. Our aim is to clarify, through a meta-analysis, the evaluation criteria proposed by different authors and the standards, after which an essay of the rhetorical criticism can be appreciated. We claim that a work of the rhetorical criticism is not just an exercise of creativity and originality, but rather a way of persuasive argumentation.https://sc.upt.ro/attachments/article/408/02_Baias.pdfrhetorical theoryrhetoric criticismevaluation standardsqualitative research methodsargumentationcritical thinking
spellingShingle Cosmin-Constantin BĂIAȘ
The Problem of Evaluation in the Rhetorical Criticism
Scientific Bulletin of the Politehnica University of Timişoara: Transactions on Modern Languages
rhetorical theory
rhetoric criticism
evaluation standards
qualitative research methods
argumentation
critical thinking
title The Problem of Evaluation in the Rhetorical Criticism
title_full The Problem of Evaluation in the Rhetorical Criticism
title_fullStr The Problem of Evaluation in the Rhetorical Criticism
title_full_unstemmed The Problem of Evaluation in the Rhetorical Criticism
title_short The Problem of Evaluation in the Rhetorical Criticism
title_sort problem of evaluation in the rhetorical criticism
topic rhetorical theory
rhetoric criticism
evaluation standards
qualitative research methods
argumentation
critical thinking
url https://sc.upt.ro/attachments/article/408/02_Baias.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cosminconstantinbaias theproblemofevaluationintherhetoricalcriticism
AT cosminconstantinbaias problemofevaluationintherhetoricalcriticism