Hukukçu Otobiyografileri ile 12 Eylül Yasallığının Dinamiklerini Düşünmek
This study analyses the realm of law that military coups both create and rely upon, as well as the ways they are established, manufactured, and employed in daily life. It will attempt to understand the legality of the September 12 period of military rule not as part of a democratic process with a vi...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Association pour la Recherche sur le Moyen-Orient
2013-06-01
|
| Series: | European Journal of Turkish Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/ejts/4733 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850166704343089152 |
|---|---|
| author | Dicle Koğacıoğlu |
| author_facet | Dicle Koğacıoğlu |
| author_sort | Dicle Koğacıoğlu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study analyses the realm of law that military coups both create and rely upon, as well as the ways they are established, manufactured, and employed in daily life. It will attempt to understand the legality of the September 12 period of military rule not as part of a democratic process with a violation of human rights, but rather as the normalization of the field of extra-ordinary legality implemented during this ‘state of exception.’ Through an in-depth analysis of the autobiographies of jurists who lived through this era the following questions shall be considered: How did the legality of the September 12 regime work? What were the methods by which this approach to law was carried out on a day-to-day basis, and how were they resisted? On what practices and concepts were the continuities and connections between the legal state of exception and ordinary legal states based? Within this framework, this essay’s first section will discuss the means of resistance to the coup described in the jurists’ autobiographies, while the second will examine the ways in which some remained passive observers to the legality of the coup era. Through discussing these two points together, the aim is to question the differences between the two and better understand the ideas and practices shared by those who resist and those who observe passively. Through such an investigation, we seek to illuminate the historical continuities of the legal state of exception in Turkey. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-aeb08702fd6e4965b5e9650f1ba58c4a |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1773-0546 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2013-06-01 |
| publisher | Association pour la Recherche sur le Moyen-Orient |
| record_format | Article |
| series | European Journal of Turkish Studies |
| spelling | doaj-art-aeb08702fd6e4965b5e9650f1ba58c4a2025-08-20T02:21:21ZengAssociation pour la Recherche sur le Moyen-OrientEuropean Journal of Turkish Studies1773-05462013-06-011510.4000/ejts.4733Hukukçu Otobiyografileri ile 12 Eylül Yasallığının Dinamiklerini DüşünmekDicle KoğacıoğluThis study analyses the realm of law that military coups both create and rely upon, as well as the ways they are established, manufactured, and employed in daily life. It will attempt to understand the legality of the September 12 period of military rule not as part of a democratic process with a violation of human rights, but rather as the normalization of the field of extra-ordinary legality implemented during this ‘state of exception.’ Through an in-depth analysis of the autobiographies of jurists who lived through this era the following questions shall be considered: How did the legality of the September 12 regime work? What were the methods by which this approach to law was carried out on a day-to-day basis, and how were they resisted? On what practices and concepts were the continuities and connections between the legal state of exception and ordinary legal states based? Within this framework, this essay’s first section will discuss the means of resistance to the coup described in the jurists’ autobiographies, while the second will examine the ways in which some remained passive observers to the legality of the coup era. Through discussing these two points together, the aim is to question the differences between the two and better understand the ideas and practices shared by those who resist and those who observe passively. Through such an investigation, we seek to illuminate the historical continuities of the legal state of exception in Turkey.https://journals.openedition.org/ejts/47331980 military coupstate of emergencyextraordinary legalityjuristsresistance |
| spellingShingle | Dicle Koğacıoğlu Hukukçu Otobiyografileri ile 12 Eylül Yasallığının Dinamiklerini Düşünmek European Journal of Turkish Studies 1980 military coup state of emergency extraordinary legality jurists resistance |
| title | Hukukçu Otobiyografileri ile 12 Eylül Yasallığının Dinamiklerini Düşünmek |
| title_full | Hukukçu Otobiyografileri ile 12 Eylül Yasallığının Dinamiklerini Düşünmek |
| title_fullStr | Hukukçu Otobiyografileri ile 12 Eylül Yasallığının Dinamiklerini Düşünmek |
| title_full_unstemmed | Hukukçu Otobiyografileri ile 12 Eylül Yasallığının Dinamiklerini Düşünmek |
| title_short | Hukukçu Otobiyografileri ile 12 Eylül Yasallığının Dinamiklerini Düşünmek |
| title_sort | hukukcu otobiyografileri ile 12 eylul yasalliginin dinamiklerini dusunmek |
| topic | 1980 military coup state of emergency extraordinary legality jurists resistance |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/ejts/4733 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT diclekogacıoglu hukukcuotobiyografileriile12eylulyasallıgınındinamiklerinidusunmek |