Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs After Hospital Discharge: A Feasibility Study

# Introduction Increasing demand for inpatient beds limits capacity and poses a challenge to the healthcare system. Early discharge may be one solution to solve this problem, and continuous vital sign monitoring at home could safely facilitate this goal. We aimed to document feasibility of continuo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicharatch Songthawornpong, Thivya Vijayakumar, Marie Said Vang Jensen, Mikkel Elvekjaer, Helge B. D. Sørensen, Eske K. Aasvang, Christian S. Meyhoff, Vibeke R. Eriksen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Patient Safety Authority 2023-06-01
Series:Patient Safety
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.33940/001c.77776
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849692773408571392
author Nicharatch Songthawornpong
Thivya Vijayakumar
Marie Said Vang Jensen
Mikkel Elvekjaer
Helge B. D. Sørensen
Eske K. Aasvang
Christian S. Meyhoff
Vibeke R. Eriksen
author_facet Nicharatch Songthawornpong
Thivya Vijayakumar
Marie Said Vang Jensen
Mikkel Elvekjaer
Helge B. D. Sørensen
Eske K. Aasvang
Christian S. Meyhoff
Vibeke R. Eriksen
author_sort Nicharatch Songthawornpong
collection DOAJ
description # Introduction Increasing demand for inpatient beds limits capacity and poses a challenge to the healthcare system. Early discharge may be one solution to solve this problem, and continuous vital sign monitoring at home could safely facilitate this goal. We aimed to document feasibility of continuous home monitoring in patients after hospital discharge. # Methods Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were admitted with acute medical disease and scheduled for discharge. They wore three wireless vital sign sensors for four days at home: a chest patch measuring heart rate and respiratory rate, a pulse oximeter, and a blood pressure (BP) monitor. Patients with ≥6 hours monitoring time after discharge were included in the analysis. Primary outcome was percentage of maximum monitoring time of heart rate and respiratory rate. # Results Monitoring was initiated in 80 patients, and 69 patients (86%) had ≥6 hours monitoring time after discharge. The chest patch, pulse oximeter, and BP monitor collected data for 88%, 60%, and 32% of the monitored time, respectively. Oxygen desaturation \<88% was observed in 92% of the patients and lasted for 6.3% (interquartile range \[IQR\] 0.9%--22.0%) of total monitoring time. Desaturation below 85% was observed in 83% of the patients and lasted 4.2% \[IQR 0.4%--9.4%\] of total monitoring time. 61% had tachypnea (\>24/minute); tachycardia (\>130/minute) lasting ≥30 minutes was observed in 28% of the patients. # Conclusions Continuous monitoring of vital signs was feasible at home with a high degree of valid monitoring time. Oxygen desaturation was commonly observed.
format Article
id doaj-art-ae9fb4ff22184d2cacc05ee6820b8aac
institution DOAJ
issn 2689-0143
2641-4716
language English
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Patient Safety Authority
record_format Article
series Patient Safety
spelling doaj-art-ae9fb4ff22184d2cacc05ee6820b8aac2025-08-20T03:20:37ZengPatient Safety AuthorityPatient Safety2689-01432641-47162023-06-015210.33940/001c.77776Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs After Hospital Discharge: A Feasibility StudyNicharatch SongthawornpongThivya VijayakumarMarie Said Vang JensenMikkel ElvekjaerHelge B. D. SørensenEske K. AasvangChristian S. MeyhoffVibeke R. Eriksen# Introduction Increasing demand for inpatient beds limits capacity and poses a challenge to the healthcare system. Early discharge may be one solution to solve this problem, and continuous vital sign monitoring at home could safely facilitate this goal. We aimed to document feasibility of continuous home monitoring in patients after hospital discharge. # Methods Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were admitted with acute medical disease and scheduled for discharge. They wore three wireless vital sign sensors for four days at home: a chest patch measuring heart rate and respiratory rate, a pulse oximeter, and a blood pressure (BP) monitor. Patients with ≥6 hours monitoring time after discharge were included in the analysis. Primary outcome was percentage of maximum monitoring time of heart rate and respiratory rate. # Results Monitoring was initiated in 80 patients, and 69 patients (86%) had ≥6 hours monitoring time after discharge. The chest patch, pulse oximeter, and BP monitor collected data for 88%, 60%, and 32% of the monitored time, respectively. Oxygen desaturation \<88% was observed in 92% of the patients and lasted for 6.3% (interquartile range \[IQR\] 0.9%--22.0%) of total monitoring time. Desaturation below 85% was observed in 83% of the patients and lasted 4.2% \[IQR 0.4%--9.4%\] of total monitoring time. 61% had tachypnea (\>24/minute); tachycardia (\>130/minute) lasting ≥30 minutes was observed in 28% of the patients. # Conclusions Continuous monitoring of vital signs was feasible at home with a high degree of valid monitoring time. Oxygen desaturation was commonly observed.https://doi.org/10.33940/001c.77776
spellingShingle Nicharatch Songthawornpong
Thivya Vijayakumar
Marie Said Vang Jensen
Mikkel Elvekjaer
Helge B. D. Sørensen
Eske K. Aasvang
Christian S. Meyhoff
Vibeke R. Eriksen
Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs After Hospital Discharge: A Feasibility Study
Patient Safety
title Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs After Hospital Discharge: A Feasibility Study
title_full Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs After Hospital Discharge: A Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs After Hospital Discharge: A Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs After Hospital Discharge: A Feasibility Study
title_short Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs After Hospital Discharge: A Feasibility Study
title_sort continuous monitoring of vital signs after hospital discharge a feasibility study
url https://doi.org/10.33940/001c.77776
work_keys_str_mv AT nicharatchsongthawornpong continuousmonitoringofvitalsignsafterhospitaldischargeafeasibilitystudy
AT thivyavijayakumar continuousmonitoringofvitalsignsafterhospitaldischargeafeasibilitystudy
AT mariesaidvangjensen continuousmonitoringofvitalsignsafterhospitaldischargeafeasibilitystudy
AT mikkelelvekjaer continuousmonitoringofvitalsignsafterhospitaldischargeafeasibilitystudy
AT helgebdsørensen continuousmonitoringofvitalsignsafterhospitaldischargeafeasibilitystudy
AT eskekaasvang continuousmonitoringofvitalsignsafterhospitaldischargeafeasibilitystudy
AT christiansmeyhoff continuousmonitoringofvitalsignsafterhospitaldischargeafeasibilitystudy
AT vibekereriksen continuousmonitoringofvitalsignsafterhospitaldischargeafeasibilitystudy