Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials

Math problems require students to think critically in solving a problem. Metacognition leads to the ability to think critically and think at a higher level cognitive process in learning. This study aims to describe the characteristics of metacognition in group discussions on fraction material for gr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dyah Triwahyuningtyas, Cholis Sa’dijah, Makbul Muksar, Subanji Subanji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET) 2024-03-01
Series:JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnal.iicet.org/index.php/jppi/article/view/3715
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832584677079121920
author Dyah Triwahyuningtyas
Cholis Sa’dijah
Makbul Muksar
Subanji Subanji
author_facet Dyah Triwahyuningtyas
Cholis Sa’dijah
Makbul Muksar
Subanji Subanji
author_sort Dyah Triwahyuningtyas
collection DOAJ
description Math problems require students to think critically in solving a problem. Metacognition leads to the ability to think critically and think at a higher level cognitive process in learning. This study aims to describe the characteristics of metacognition in group discussions on fraction material for grade 5 elementary school students. This type of research uses qualitative descriptive research. The data collection methods used in this research are observation, interview and documentation. The characteristics of students' metacognition can be obtained through observation when students discuss working on problems. Metacognitive activities of 5th grade elementary school students are classified into 3 namely awareness, regulation and evaluation. Students' metacognitive awareness is able to understand the problem and students are able to know what the next thing will be done after understanding the problem. Regulation students are able to choose the strategy that will be used to solve the problem and students are able to apply the chosen strategy to solve the problem. Evaluation students are able to check the answers that are done correctly and are able to ensure that the answers are correct. During group discussions, students are divided into 3 roles, namely students as experts, facilitators and beginners. During group discussion activities to solve problems, not all metacognitive activities appear in each student. Facilitators can influence beginners to be active in the discussion and expert students can help group mates to rethink what they have done before.
format Article
id doaj-art-ae719334fe6c433ab6d99667c079762f
institution Kabale University
issn 2477-8524
2502-8103
language English
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET)
record_format Article
series JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)
spelling doaj-art-ae719334fe6c433ab6d99667c079762f2025-01-27T12:25:44ZengIndonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET)JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)2477-85242502-81032024-03-0110139940810.29210/0202437151900Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materialsDyah Triwahyuningtyas0Cholis Sa’dijah1Makbul Muksar2Subanji Subanji3Universitas Negeri Malang Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan MalangUniversitas Negeri MalangUniversitas Negeri MalangUniversitas Negeri MalangMath problems require students to think critically in solving a problem. Metacognition leads to the ability to think critically and think at a higher level cognitive process in learning. This study aims to describe the characteristics of metacognition in group discussions on fraction material for grade 5 elementary school students. This type of research uses qualitative descriptive research. The data collection methods used in this research are observation, interview and documentation. The characteristics of students' metacognition can be obtained through observation when students discuss working on problems. Metacognitive activities of 5th grade elementary school students are classified into 3 namely awareness, regulation and evaluation. Students' metacognitive awareness is able to understand the problem and students are able to know what the next thing will be done after understanding the problem. Regulation students are able to choose the strategy that will be used to solve the problem and students are able to apply the chosen strategy to solve the problem. Evaluation students are able to check the answers that are done correctly and are able to ensure that the answers are correct. During group discussions, students are divided into 3 roles, namely students as experts, facilitators and beginners. During group discussion activities to solve problems, not all metacognitive activities appear in each student. Facilitators can influence beginners to be active in the discussion and expert students can help group mates to rethink what they have done before.https://jurnal.iicet.org/index.php/jppi/article/view/3715metacognitive, group discussion, positioning
spellingShingle Dyah Triwahyuningtyas
Cholis Sa’dijah
Makbul Muksar
Subanji Subanji
Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials
JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)
metacognitive, group discussion, positioning
title Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials
title_full Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials
title_fullStr Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials
title_short Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials
title_sort analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials
topic metacognitive, group discussion, positioning
url https://jurnal.iicet.org/index.php/jppi/article/view/3715
work_keys_str_mv AT dyahtriwahyuningtyas analysisofmetacognitivecharacteristicsingroupdiscussionongrade5fractionmaterials
AT cholissadijah analysisofmetacognitivecharacteristicsingroupdiscussionongrade5fractionmaterials
AT makbulmuksar analysisofmetacognitivecharacteristicsingroupdiscussionongrade5fractionmaterials
AT subanjisubanji analysisofmetacognitivecharacteristicsingroupdiscussionongrade5fractionmaterials