Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials
Math problems require students to think critically in solving a problem. Metacognition leads to the ability to think critically and think at a higher level cognitive process in learning. This study aims to describe the characteristics of metacognition in group discussions on fraction material for gr...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET)
2024-03-01
|
Series: | JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jurnal.iicet.org/index.php/jppi/article/view/3715 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832584677079121920 |
---|---|
author | Dyah Triwahyuningtyas Cholis Sa’dijah Makbul Muksar Subanji Subanji |
author_facet | Dyah Triwahyuningtyas Cholis Sa’dijah Makbul Muksar Subanji Subanji |
author_sort | Dyah Triwahyuningtyas |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Math problems require students to think critically in solving a problem. Metacognition leads to the ability to think critically and think at a higher level cognitive process in learning. This study aims to describe the characteristics of metacognition in group discussions on fraction material for grade 5 elementary school students. This type of research uses qualitative descriptive research. The data collection methods used in this research are observation, interview and documentation. The characteristics of students' metacognition can be obtained through observation when students discuss working on problems. Metacognitive activities of 5th grade elementary school students are classified into 3 namely awareness, regulation and evaluation. Students' metacognitive awareness is able to understand the problem and students are able to know what the next thing will be done after understanding the problem. Regulation students are able to choose the strategy that will be used to solve the problem and students are able to apply the chosen strategy to solve the problem. Evaluation students are able to check the answers that are done correctly and are able to ensure that the answers are correct. During group discussions, students are divided into 3 roles, namely students as experts, facilitators and beginners. During group discussion activities to solve problems, not all metacognitive activities appear in each student. Facilitators can influence beginners to be active in the discussion and expert students can help group mates to rethink what they have done before. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-ae719334fe6c433ab6d99667c079762f |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2477-8524 2502-8103 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
publisher | Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET) |
record_format | Article |
series | JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) |
spelling | doaj-art-ae719334fe6c433ab6d99667c079762f2025-01-27T12:25:44ZengIndonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET)JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)2477-85242502-81032024-03-0110139940810.29210/0202437151900Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materialsDyah Triwahyuningtyas0Cholis Sa’dijah1Makbul Muksar2Subanji Subanji3Universitas Negeri Malang Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan MalangUniversitas Negeri MalangUniversitas Negeri MalangUniversitas Negeri MalangMath problems require students to think critically in solving a problem. Metacognition leads to the ability to think critically and think at a higher level cognitive process in learning. This study aims to describe the characteristics of metacognition in group discussions on fraction material for grade 5 elementary school students. This type of research uses qualitative descriptive research. The data collection methods used in this research are observation, interview and documentation. The characteristics of students' metacognition can be obtained through observation when students discuss working on problems. Metacognitive activities of 5th grade elementary school students are classified into 3 namely awareness, regulation and evaluation. Students' metacognitive awareness is able to understand the problem and students are able to know what the next thing will be done after understanding the problem. Regulation students are able to choose the strategy that will be used to solve the problem and students are able to apply the chosen strategy to solve the problem. Evaluation students are able to check the answers that are done correctly and are able to ensure that the answers are correct. During group discussions, students are divided into 3 roles, namely students as experts, facilitators and beginners. During group discussion activities to solve problems, not all metacognitive activities appear in each student. Facilitators can influence beginners to be active in the discussion and expert students can help group mates to rethink what they have done before.https://jurnal.iicet.org/index.php/jppi/article/view/3715metacognitive, group discussion, positioning |
spellingShingle | Dyah Triwahyuningtyas Cholis Sa’dijah Makbul Muksar Subanji Subanji Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) metacognitive, group discussion, positioning |
title | Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials |
title_full | Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials |
title_fullStr | Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials |
title_short | Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials |
title_sort | analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials |
topic | metacognitive, group discussion, positioning |
url | https://jurnal.iicet.org/index.php/jppi/article/view/3715 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dyahtriwahyuningtyas analysisofmetacognitivecharacteristicsingroupdiscussionongrade5fractionmaterials AT cholissadijah analysisofmetacognitivecharacteristicsingroupdiscussionongrade5fractionmaterials AT makbulmuksar analysisofmetacognitivecharacteristicsingroupdiscussionongrade5fractionmaterials AT subanjisubanji analysisofmetacognitivecharacteristicsingroupdiscussionongrade5fractionmaterials |