La surveillance comme dispositif-frontière

This paper focuses on the functioning of a surveillance device of resistant bacteria of animal origin, named Résapath. Through a historical and pragmatic analysis, I show how three kinds of actors progressively cooperate with the aim of producing knowledge on antimicrobial resistance risks related t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nicolas Fortané
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Société d'Anthropologie des Connaissances 2015-06-01
Series:Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/rac/3355
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850199114661232640
author Nicolas Fortané
author_facet Nicolas Fortané
author_sort Nicolas Fortané
collection DOAJ
description This paper focuses on the functioning of a surveillance device of resistant bacteria of animal origin, named Résapath. Through a historical and pragmatic analysis, I show how three kinds of actors progressively cooperate with the aim of producing knowledge on antimicrobial resistance risks related to the use of antibiotics in veterinary medicine. But the involvements of microbiologists, epidemiologists and veterinarians in the surveillance device don’t rest on the same practices and the same objectives. So Résapth produce three ontologies of resistant bacteria that are partly incommensurable and shape ignorance and uncertainties in the governability of such (non)knowledge objects.
format Article
id doaj-art-ae712ffd734348de9f51a140743a9fa2
institution OA Journals
issn 1760-5393
language fra
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher Société d'Anthropologie des Connaissances
record_format Article
series Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances
spelling doaj-art-ae712ffd734348de9f51a140743a9fa22025-08-20T02:12:42ZfraSociété d'Anthropologie des ConnaissancesRevue d'anthropologie des connaissances1760-53932015-06-019210.3917/rac.027.0265La surveillance comme dispositif-frontièreNicolas FortanéThis paper focuses on the functioning of a surveillance device of resistant bacteria of animal origin, named Résapath. Through a historical and pragmatic analysis, I show how three kinds of actors progressively cooperate with the aim of producing knowledge on antimicrobial resistance risks related to the use of antibiotics in veterinary medicine. But the involvements of microbiologists, epidemiologists and veterinarians in the surveillance device don’t rest on the same practices and the same objectives. So Résapth produce three ontologies of resistant bacteria that are partly incommensurable and shape ignorance and uncertainties in the governability of such (non)knowledge objects.https://journals.openedition.org/rac/3355ignoranceepidemiologic surveillanceknowledge production deviceontologysocial production of ignoranceantimicrobial resistance
spellingShingle Nicolas Fortané
La surveillance comme dispositif-frontière
Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances
ignorance
epidemiologic surveillance
knowledge production device
ontology
social production of ignorance
antimicrobial resistance
title La surveillance comme dispositif-frontière
title_full La surveillance comme dispositif-frontière
title_fullStr La surveillance comme dispositif-frontière
title_full_unstemmed La surveillance comme dispositif-frontière
title_short La surveillance comme dispositif-frontière
title_sort la surveillance comme dispositif frontiere
topic ignorance
epidemiologic surveillance
knowledge production device
ontology
social production of ignorance
antimicrobial resistance
url https://journals.openedition.org/rac/3355
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolasfortane lasurveillancecommedispositiffrontiere