Discrepancies between supervisor self-evaluations and staff perceptions of leadership: a cross-sectional study in healthcare

Abstract Background Employees’ perceptions of their supervisors’ leadership influence their conduct and daily performance. These perceptions often conflict with leaders’ self-assessments. Understanding this incongruency can help leaders improve their leadership skills. This study aimed to assess the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nguyen Hoang Long, Julie Sochalski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-08-01
Series:BMC Nursing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03665-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849344675157114880
author Nguyen Hoang Long
Julie Sochalski
author_facet Nguyen Hoang Long
Julie Sochalski
author_sort Nguyen Hoang Long
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Employees’ perceptions of their supervisors’ leadership influence their conduct and daily performance. These perceptions often conflict with leaders’ self-assessments. Understanding this incongruency can help leaders improve their leadership skills. This study aimed to assess the congruency between frontline healthcare staff’s and supervisors’ perceptions of leadership styles. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2021 and June 2022. Data were collected from a convenience sample of 574 professional and technical staff (nurses, midwives, and technicians) and 93 direct supervisors recruited from all seven hospitals of the Vinmec Healthcare System, which is the largest private healthcare system in Vietnam. Leadership style was assessed using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ 5X). Results Study findings revealed similarities and differences in perceptions of leadership between staff and supervisors. Both groups agreed that transactional contingent reward behaviors were most frequently used, as indicated by mean scores above 2.5, whereas laissez-faire behaviors were least often utilized, with the lowest overall ratings (supervisors: 0.92 ± 0.67; staff: 1.23 ± 0.78). However, supervisors’ scores were significantly higher than those of their staff for almost all leadership components, with large and significant mean differences observed in areas such as individualized consideration (mean difference = 0.63, t = 9.34, p <.001). Notably, staff rated supervisors as using laissez-faire behaviors more frequently than their supervisors assumed they did, with a statistically significant difference (t = − 3.96, p <.001). Regarding leadership outcomes, supervisors believed that their leadership style was more effective than their staff perceived it, as evidenced by higher scores for effectiveness (2.94 vs. 2.72, t = 3.46, p <.001), satisfaction (3.02 vs. 2.73, t = 3.90, p <.001), and extra effort (2.98 vs. 2.57, t = 6.49, p <.001). Conclusion Supervisors should recognize their leadership styles and how they are perceived by staff, using feedback as a basis for self-improvement and ensuring their intentions are clearly communicated. In nursing, 360-degree feedback and reflective practices may help narrow leadership perception gaps. Future research should examine factors underlying these discrepancies and assess whether improving alignment enhances team performance and care quality. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
format Article
id doaj-art-ae2699f0f900442e938d53dbbabda943
institution Kabale University
issn 1472-6955
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Nursing
spelling doaj-art-ae2699f0f900442e938d53dbbabda9432025-08-20T03:42:37ZengBMCBMC Nursing1472-69552025-08-012411710.1186/s12912-025-03665-xDiscrepancies between supervisor self-evaluations and staff perceptions of leadership: a cross-sectional study in healthcareNguyen Hoang Long0Julie Sochalski1College of Health Sciences, VinUniversityUniversity of Pennsylvania School of NursingAbstract Background Employees’ perceptions of their supervisors’ leadership influence their conduct and daily performance. These perceptions often conflict with leaders’ self-assessments. Understanding this incongruency can help leaders improve their leadership skills. This study aimed to assess the congruency between frontline healthcare staff’s and supervisors’ perceptions of leadership styles. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2021 and June 2022. Data were collected from a convenience sample of 574 professional and technical staff (nurses, midwives, and technicians) and 93 direct supervisors recruited from all seven hospitals of the Vinmec Healthcare System, which is the largest private healthcare system in Vietnam. Leadership style was assessed using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ 5X). Results Study findings revealed similarities and differences in perceptions of leadership between staff and supervisors. Both groups agreed that transactional contingent reward behaviors were most frequently used, as indicated by mean scores above 2.5, whereas laissez-faire behaviors were least often utilized, with the lowest overall ratings (supervisors: 0.92 ± 0.67; staff: 1.23 ± 0.78). However, supervisors’ scores were significantly higher than those of their staff for almost all leadership components, with large and significant mean differences observed in areas such as individualized consideration (mean difference = 0.63, t = 9.34, p <.001). Notably, staff rated supervisors as using laissez-faire behaviors more frequently than their supervisors assumed they did, with a statistically significant difference (t = − 3.96, p <.001). Regarding leadership outcomes, supervisors believed that their leadership style was more effective than their staff perceived it, as evidenced by higher scores for effectiveness (2.94 vs. 2.72, t = 3.46, p <.001), satisfaction (3.02 vs. 2.73, t = 3.90, p <.001), and extra effort (2.98 vs. 2.57, t = 6.49, p <.001). Conclusion Supervisors should recognize their leadership styles and how they are perceived by staff, using feedback as a basis for self-improvement and ensuring their intentions are clearly communicated. In nursing, 360-degree feedback and reflective practices may help narrow leadership perception gaps. Future research should examine factors underlying these discrepancies and assess whether improving alignment enhances team performance and care quality. Clinical trial number Not applicable.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03665-xLeadership stylesHealthcare leadershipLeadership evaluations
spellingShingle Nguyen Hoang Long
Julie Sochalski
Discrepancies between supervisor self-evaluations and staff perceptions of leadership: a cross-sectional study in healthcare
BMC Nursing
Leadership styles
Healthcare leadership
Leadership evaluations
title Discrepancies between supervisor self-evaluations and staff perceptions of leadership: a cross-sectional study in healthcare
title_full Discrepancies between supervisor self-evaluations and staff perceptions of leadership: a cross-sectional study in healthcare
title_fullStr Discrepancies between supervisor self-evaluations and staff perceptions of leadership: a cross-sectional study in healthcare
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancies between supervisor self-evaluations and staff perceptions of leadership: a cross-sectional study in healthcare
title_short Discrepancies between supervisor self-evaluations and staff perceptions of leadership: a cross-sectional study in healthcare
title_sort discrepancies between supervisor self evaluations and staff perceptions of leadership a cross sectional study in healthcare
topic Leadership styles
Healthcare leadership
Leadership evaluations
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03665-x
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenhoanglong discrepanciesbetweensupervisorselfevaluationsandstaffperceptionsofleadershipacrosssectionalstudyinhealthcare
AT juliesochalski discrepanciesbetweensupervisorselfevaluationsandstaffperceptionsofleadershipacrosssectionalstudyinhealthcare