Artificial intelligence and digital art: current state and development prospects

The article analyzes the use of artificial intelligence in various types of digital art at the current level of their development and outlines the possibilities of external ways of such interaction. The author considers specific artistic examples, which see that the use of artificial intelligence i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Марія Чікарькова
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University 2024-01-01
Series:Cхід
Subjects:
Online Access:https://skhid.kubg.edu.ua/article/view/294658
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849409568483835904
author Марія Чікарькова
author_facet Марія Чікарькова
author_sort Марія Чікарькова
collection DOAJ
description The article analyzes the use of artificial intelligence in various types of digital art at the current level of their development and outlines the possibilities of external ways of such interaction. The author considers specific artistic examples, which see that the use of artificial intelligence in art develops a complex art history and philo-sophical questions: what is art? how does computer technology change aesthetics? where is the line between technology and creativity? who is considered the author of the work generated by neuronets? is it possible to compare anthropocentric and non-anthropocentric forms of creativity? etc. The researcher demonstrates different approaches to the chosen topic, citing antagonistic points of view of scientists. Some of them believe that art with the help of a computer is the next step in the development of avant-garde trends, while others see these trends as the degradation and even the death of art. In digital painting, we are already faced with the use of works (the most famous example is the android-artist Ai-Da) who know how to draw in different techniques and with the use of different tools. The victory of a painting generated by a neural network at an art competition raised questions about its au-thorship and the admissibility of participation of such works in competitions for art-ists. Discussions on the ArtStation platform indicate that many artists do not per-ceive works made with the help of artificial intelligence as "real" works of art. In mu-sic today, it is possible not just to generate melodies, but to create an imitation of certain styles or composers, which raises questions about the nature of true creativi-ty and its limits. Another direction of using artificial intelligence in music is the crea-tion of virtual singers who become mega-popular. Such an example is given by the Japanese virtual singer Hatsune Miku, who is a hologram with an android interface and an artificially generated voice. In the field of video games, artificial intelligence knows how to create not only levels, but already generate game target worlds and complete games. Artificial intelligence in photography can generate images of non-existent people. At the same time, it is unlikely that artificial intelligence can com-pletely replace a human artist, after which he learns from the previously created ma-terial. This makes it possible to say that he left real creativity and knows how to compile in advance, and not to generate original artistic solutions.
format Article
id doaj-art-adeddd4fd2ea4fc2adabd61cf6aea1f7
institution Kabale University
issn 1728-9343
2411-3093
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University
record_format Article
series Cхід
spelling doaj-art-adeddd4fd2ea4fc2adabd61cf6aea1f72025-08-20T03:35:27ZengBorys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan UniversityCхід1728-93432411-30932024-01-014310.21847/2411-3093.2023.4(3).294658Artificial intelligence and digital art: current state and development prospectsМарія Чікарькова0Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University The article analyzes the use of artificial intelligence in various types of digital art at the current level of their development and outlines the possibilities of external ways of such interaction. The author considers specific artistic examples, which see that the use of artificial intelligence in art develops a complex art history and philo-sophical questions: what is art? how does computer technology change aesthetics? where is the line between technology and creativity? who is considered the author of the work generated by neuronets? is it possible to compare anthropocentric and non-anthropocentric forms of creativity? etc. The researcher demonstrates different approaches to the chosen topic, citing antagonistic points of view of scientists. Some of them believe that art with the help of a computer is the next step in the development of avant-garde trends, while others see these trends as the degradation and even the death of art. In digital painting, we are already faced with the use of works (the most famous example is the android-artist Ai-Da) who know how to draw in different techniques and with the use of different tools. The victory of a painting generated by a neural network at an art competition raised questions about its au-thorship and the admissibility of participation of such works in competitions for art-ists. Discussions on the ArtStation platform indicate that many artists do not per-ceive works made with the help of artificial intelligence as "real" works of art. In mu-sic today, it is possible not just to generate melodies, but to create an imitation of certain styles or composers, which raises questions about the nature of true creativi-ty and its limits. Another direction of using artificial intelligence in music is the crea-tion of virtual singers who become mega-popular. Such an example is given by the Japanese virtual singer Hatsune Miku, who is a hologram with an android interface and an artificially generated voice. In the field of video games, artificial intelligence knows how to create not only levels, but already generate game target worlds and complete games. Artificial intelligence in photography can generate images of non-existent people. At the same time, it is unlikely that artificial intelligence can com-pletely replace a human artist, after which he learns from the previously created ma-terial. This makes it possible to say that he left real creativity and knows how to compile in advance, and not to generate original artistic solutions. https://skhid.kubg.edu.ua/article/view/294658artificial intelligencedigital artNeural networkscreativitycomputer aesthetic
spellingShingle Марія Чікарькова
Artificial intelligence and digital art: current state and development prospects
Cхід
artificial intelligence
digital art
Neural networks
creativity
computer aesthetic
title Artificial intelligence and digital art: current state and development prospects
title_full Artificial intelligence and digital art: current state and development prospects
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence and digital art: current state and development prospects
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence and digital art: current state and development prospects
title_short Artificial intelligence and digital art: current state and development prospects
title_sort artificial intelligence and digital art current state and development prospects
topic artificial intelligence
digital art
Neural networks
creativity
computer aesthetic
url https://skhid.kubg.edu.ua/article/view/294658
work_keys_str_mv AT maríâčíkarʹkova artificialintelligenceanddigitalartcurrentstateanddevelopmentprospects