Network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of management for resectable stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Abstract Background There is controversy regarding the optimal treatment for stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to address this crucial issue through a frequentist network meta-analysis. Methods We conducted a literature database search for randomized controlled trials compar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qiduo Yu, Haoshuai Yang, Fei Xiao, Zihan Wang, Zhenrong Zhang, Qianli Ma, Hongxiang Feng, Zhoujunyi Tian, Jin Zhang, Chaoyang Liang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-10-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13047-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background There is controversy regarding the optimal treatment for stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to address this crucial issue through a frequentist network meta-analysis. Methods We conducted a literature database search for randomized controlled trials comparing the following treatment modalities before March 1st, 2023: surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and various combinations of these treatments. Summary data on overall survival (OS) and treatment-related deaths (trDeath) were analyzed using frequentist methods. Results Twenty-two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 3269 participants were included, covering 17 treatment regimens. In terms of overall survival, surgery followed by adjuvant targeted therapy (S-T), neoadjuvant targeted therapy followed by surgery and adjuvant targeted therapy (T-S-T), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (C-S-C) were relatively more advantageous than other treatment regimens. Overall, S-T is the most likely treatment option to prolong OS, with a 59.8% likelihood, while immunotherapy plus chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (IC-S-C) demonstrates good safety. Conclusion S-T and T-S-T treatments have the greatest potential to be the optimal overall survival treatments for stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients with positive driver genes, demonstrating significant clinical application prospects. While for patients with negative driver genes, C-S-C treatments benefit the most. The protocol was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO (CRD42022372711).
ISSN:1471-2407