Exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in England: a mixed methodology study

Objective To assess how lifestyle weight management programmes for children aged 4–16 years in England are commissioned and evaluated at the local level.Design This was a mixed-methods study comprising an online survey and semistructured telephone interviews.Setting An online survey was sent to all...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruth Mears, Deborah Sharp, Anamica Patel, Ruth Kipping, Julian P H Shield
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/12/e025423.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850056146644107264
author Ruth Mears
Deborah Sharp
Anamica Patel
Ruth Kipping
Julian P H Shield
author_facet Ruth Mears
Deborah Sharp
Anamica Patel
Ruth Kipping
Julian P H Shield
author_sort Ruth Mears
collection DOAJ
description Objective To assess how lifestyle weight management programmes for children aged 4–16 years in England are commissioned and evaluated at the local level.Design This was a mixed-methods study comprising an online survey and semistructured telephone interviews.Setting An online survey was sent to all local authorities (LAs) in England regarding lifestyle weight management services commissioned for children aged 4–16 years. Online survey data were collected between February and May 2016 and based on services commissioned between April 2014 and March 2015. Semistructured telephone interviews with LA staff across England were conducted between April and June 2016.Participants Commissioners or service providers working within the public health department of LAs.Main outcome measures The online survey collected information on the evidence base, costs, reach, service usage and evaluation of child lifestyle weight management services. The telephone interviews explored the nature of child weight management contracts commissioned by LAs, the type of outcome data collected and whether these data were shared with other LAs or organisations, the challenges faced by these services, and the perceived ‘markers of success’ for a programme.Results The online survey showed that none of the participating LAs was aware of any peer-reviewed evidence supporting the effectiveness of their specific commissioned service. Despite this, the telephone interviews revealed that there was no national formal sharing of data to enable oversight of the effectiveness of commissioned services across LAs in England to help inform future commissioning decisions. Challenges with long-term data collection, service engagement, funding and the pressure to reduce the prevalence of obesity were frequently mentioned.Conclusions Robust, independent, cost-effectiveness analyses of obesity strategies are needed to determine the appropriate allocation of funding to lifestyle weight management treatment services, population-level preventative approaches or development of whole system approaches by an LA.
format Article
id doaj-art-adc15212d1bc4ad68cdd96d677e95c10
institution DOAJ
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-adc15212d1bc4ad68cdd96d677e95c102025-08-20T02:51:46ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552019-12-0191210.1136/bmjopen-2018-025423Exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in England: a mixed methodology studyRuth Mears0Deborah Sharp1Anamica Patel2Ruth Kipping3Julian P H Shield4Centre for Exercise Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKObservatory Evidence Service, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UKCentre for Public Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UKObjective To assess how lifestyle weight management programmes for children aged 4–16 years in England are commissioned and evaluated at the local level.Design This was a mixed-methods study comprising an online survey and semistructured telephone interviews.Setting An online survey was sent to all local authorities (LAs) in England regarding lifestyle weight management services commissioned for children aged 4–16 years. Online survey data were collected between February and May 2016 and based on services commissioned between April 2014 and March 2015. Semistructured telephone interviews with LA staff across England were conducted between April and June 2016.Participants Commissioners or service providers working within the public health department of LAs.Main outcome measures The online survey collected information on the evidence base, costs, reach, service usage and evaluation of child lifestyle weight management services. The telephone interviews explored the nature of child weight management contracts commissioned by LAs, the type of outcome data collected and whether these data were shared with other LAs or organisations, the challenges faced by these services, and the perceived ‘markers of success’ for a programme.Results The online survey showed that none of the participating LAs was aware of any peer-reviewed evidence supporting the effectiveness of their specific commissioned service. Despite this, the telephone interviews revealed that there was no national formal sharing of data to enable oversight of the effectiveness of commissioned services across LAs in England to help inform future commissioning decisions. Challenges with long-term data collection, service engagement, funding and the pressure to reduce the prevalence of obesity were frequently mentioned.Conclusions Robust, independent, cost-effectiveness analyses of obesity strategies are needed to determine the appropriate allocation of funding to lifestyle weight management treatment services, population-level preventative approaches or development of whole system approaches by an LA.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/12/e025423.full
spellingShingle Ruth Mears
Deborah Sharp
Anamica Patel
Ruth Kipping
Julian P H Shield
Exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in England: a mixed methodology study
BMJ Open
title Exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in England: a mixed methodology study
title_full Exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in England: a mixed methodology study
title_fullStr Exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in England: a mixed methodology study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in England: a mixed methodology study
title_short Exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in England: a mixed methodology study
title_sort exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in england a mixed methodology study
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/12/e025423.full
work_keys_str_mv AT ruthmears exploringhowlifestyleweightmanagementprogrammesforchildrenarecommissionedandevaluatedinenglandamixedmethodologystudy
AT deborahsharp exploringhowlifestyleweightmanagementprogrammesforchildrenarecommissionedandevaluatedinenglandamixedmethodologystudy
AT anamicapatel exploringhowlifestyleweightmanagementprogrammesforchildrenarecommissionedandevaluatedinenglandamixedmethodologystudy
AT ruthkipping exploringhowlifestyleweightmanagementprogrammesforchildrenarecommissionedandevaluatedinenglandamixedmethodologystudy
AT julianphshield exploringhowlifestyleweightmanagementprogrammesforchildrenarecommissionedandevaluatedinenglandamixedmethodologystudy