Alexandre de la Charme’s Chinese–Manchu Treatise <i>Xingli zhenquan tigang</i> (<i>Sing lii jen ciyan bithei hešen</i>) in the Early Entangled History of Christian, Neo-Confucian, and Manchu Shamanic Thought and Spirituality as Well as Early Sinology

The work <i>Xingli zhenquan tigang</i> (<i>Sing lii jen ciyan bithei hešen</i>) was written in Chinese and Manchu by the French Jesuit Alexandre de la Charme (1695–1767) and published in Beijing in 1753. The first two sections of this paper provide an introduction to de la Ch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David Bartosch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/7/891
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849251940827922432
author David Bartosch
author_facet David Bartosch
author_sort David Bartosch
collection DOAJ
description The work <i>Xingli zhenquan tigang</i> (<i>Sing lii jen ciyan bithei hešen</i>) was written in Chinese and Manchu by the French Jesuit Alexandre de la Charme (1695–1767) and published in Beijing in 1753. The first two sections of this paper provide an introduction to de la Charme’s work biography and to further textual and historical contexts, explore the peculiarities of the subsequent early German reception of the work almost 90 years later, and introduce the content from an overview perspective. The third section explores the most essential contents of Book 1 (of 3) of the Manchu version. The investigation is based on Hans Conon von der Gabelentz’s (1807–1874) German translation from 1840. Camouflaged as a Confucian educational dialogue, and by blurring his true identity in his publication, de la Charme criticizes Neo-Confucian positions from an implicitly Cartesian and hidden Christian perspective, tacitly blending Cartesian views with traditional Chinese concepts. In addition, he alludes to Manchu shamanic views in the same regard. De la Charme’s assimilating rhetoric “triangulation” of three different cultural and linguistic horizons of thought and spirituality proves that later Jesuit scholarship reached out into the inherent ethnic and spiritual diversity of the Qing intellectual and political elites. Hidden allusions to Descartes’s dualistic concepts of <i>res cogitans</i> and <i>res extensa</i> implicitly anticipate the beginnings of China’s intellectual modernization period one and a half centuries later. This work also provides an example of how the exchange of intellectual and religious elements persisted despite the Rites Controversy and demonstrates how the fading Jesuit mission influenced early German sinology. I believe that this previously underexplored work is significant in both systematic and historical respects. It is particularly relevant in the context of current comparative research fields, as well as transcultural and interreligious intellectual dialogue in East Asia and around the world.
format Article
id doaj-art-ad42d230838e4c30b744bcb71a72e316
institution Kabale University
issn 2077-1444
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj-art-ad42d230838e4c30b744bcb71a72e3162025-08-20T03:56:46ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442025-07-0116789110.3390/rel16070891Alexandre de la Charme’s Chinese–Manchu Treatise <i>Xingli zhenquan tigang</i> (<i>Sing lii jen ciyan bithei hešen</i>) in the Early Entangled History of Christian, Neo-Confucian, and Manchu Shamanic Thought and Spirituality as Well as Early SinologyDavid Bartosch0Institute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai 519087, ChinaThe work <i>Xingli zhenquan tigang</i> (<i>Sing lii jen ciyan bithei hešen</i>) was written in Chinese and Manchu by the French Jesuit Alexandre de la Charme (1695–1767) and published in Beijing in 1753. The first two sections of this paper provide an introduction to de la Charme’s work biography and to further textual and historical contexts, explore the peculiarities of the subsequent early German reception of the work almost 90 years later, and introduce the content from an overview perspective. The third section explores the most essential contents of Book 1 (of 3) of the Manchu version. The investigation is based on Hans Conon von der Gabelentz’s (1807–1874) German translation from 1840. Camouflaged as a Confucian educational dialogue, and by blurring his true identity in his publication, de la Charme criticizes Neo-Confucian positions from an implicitly Cartesian and hidden Christian perspective, tacitly blending Cartesian views with traditional Chinese concepts. In addition, he alludes to Manchu shamanic views in the same regard. De la Charme’s assimilating rhetoric “triangulation” of three different cultural and linguistic horizons of thought and spirituality proves that later Jesuit scholarship reached out into the inherent ethnic and spiritual diversity of the Qing intellectual and political elites. Hidden allusions to Descartes’s dualistic concepts of <i>res cogitans</i> and <i>res extensa</i> implicitly anticipate the beginnings of China’s intellectual modernization period one and a half centuries later. This work also provides an example of how the exchange of intellectual and religious elements persisted despite the Rites Controversy and demonstrates how the fading Jesuit mission influenced early German sinology. I believe that this previously underexplored work is significant in both systematic and historical respects. It is particularly relevant in the context of current comparative research fields, as well as transcultural and interreligious intellectual dialogue in East Asia and around the world.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/7/891entangled history of philosophy and religionChinese–European intellectual historyJesuit China missionRené Descartessoul doctrinedualism
spellingShingle David Bartosch
Alexandre de la Charme’s Chinese–Manchu Treatise <i>Xingli zhenquan tigang</i> (<i>Sing lii jen ciyan bithei hešen</i>) in the Early Entangled History of Christian, Neo-Confucian, and Manchu Shamanic Thought and Spirituality as Well as Early Sinology
Religions
entangled history of philosophy and religion
Chinese–European intellectual history
Jesuit China mission
René Descartes
soul doctrine
dualism
title Alexandre de la Charme’s Chinese–Manchu Treatise <i>Xingli zhenquan tigang</i> (<i>Sing lii jen ciyan bithei hešen</i>) in the Early Entangled History of Christian, Neo-Confucian, and Manchu Shamanic Thought and Spirituality as Well as Early Sinology
title_full Alexandre de la Charme’s Chinese–Manchu Treatise <i>Xingli zhenquan tigang</i> (<i>Sing lii jen ciyan bithei hešen</i>) in the Early Entangled History of Christian, Neo-Confucian, and Manchu Shamanic Thought and Spirituality as Well as Early Sinology
title_fullStr Alexandre de la Charme’s Chinese–Manchu Treatise <i>Xingli zhenquan tigang</i> (<i>Sing lii jen ciyan bithei hešen</i>) in the Early Entangled History of Christian, Neo-Confucian, and Manchu Shamanic Thought and Spirituality as Well as Early Sinology
title_full_unstemmed Alexandre de la Charme’s Chinese–Manchu Treatise <i>Xingli zhenquan tigang</i> (<i>Sing lii jen ciyan bithei hešen</i>) in the Early Entangled History of Christian, Neo-Confucian, and Manchu Shamanic Thought and Spirituality as Well as Early Sinology
title_short Alexandre de la Charme’s Chinese–Manchu Treatise <i>Xingli zhenquan tigang</i> (<i>Sing lii jen ciyan bithei hešen</i>) in the Early Entangled History of Christian, Neo-Confucian, and Manchu Shamanic Thought and Spirituality as Well as Early Sinology
title_sort alexandre de la charme s chinese manchu treatise i xingli zhenquan tigang i i sing lii jen ciyan bithei hesen i in the early entangled history of christian neo confucian and manchu shamanic thought and spirituality as well as early sinology
topic entangled history of philosophy and religion
Chinese–European intellectual history
Jesuit China mission
René Descartes
soul doctrine
dualism
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/7/891
work_keys_str_mv AT davidbartosch alexandredelacharmeschinesemanchutreatiseixinglizhenquantigangiisingliijenciyanbitheiheseniintheearlyentangledhistoryofchristianneoconfucianandmanchushamanicthoughtandspiritualityaswellasearlysinology