On derivative consequence argument

The article gives critical remarks to the derivative consequence argument proposed by Bogdan Faul. The first critical remark concerns the ontological status of the laws of nature, the second remark deals with the term «physicalism». It is demonstrated that conceptual vagueness of the terms used b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: D. N. Razeev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education 2020-12-01
Series:Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность"
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2020/%D0%A2.%205,%20%E2%84%96%204%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/66-68%20%D0%A0%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B5%D0%B5%D0%B2%20%D0%94.%20%D0%9D..pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832569820682387456
author D. N. Razeev
author_facet D. N. Razeev
author_sort D. N. Razeev
collection DOAJ
description The article gives critical remarks to the derivative consequence argument proposed by Bogdan Faul. The first critical remark concerns the ontological status of the laws of nature, the second remark deals with the term «physicalism». It is demonstrated that conceptual vagueness of the terms used by B. Faul in his article undermines the validity of the proposed derivative argument
format Article
id doaj-art-ad279c853d0c442983e73c666eca0a7f
institution Kabale University
issn 2542-0488
2541-7983
language English
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education
record_format Article
series Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность"
spelling doaj-art-ad279c853d0c442983e73c666eca0a7f2025-02-02T19:44:41ZengOmsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher EducationОмский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность"2542-04882541-79832020-12-0154666810.25206/2542-0488-2020-5-4-66-68On derivative consequence argumentD. N. Razeev0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5129-7532Saint Petersburg State UniversityThe article gives critical remarks to the derivative consequence argument proposed by Bogdan Faul. The first critical remark concerns the ontological status of the laws of nature, the second remark deals with the term «physicalism». It is demonstrated that conceptual vagueness of the terms used by B. Faul in his article undermines the validity of the proposed derivative argumenthttps://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2020/%D0%A2.%205,%20%E2%84%96%204%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/66-68%20%D0%A0%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B5%D0%B5%D0%B2%20%D0%94.%20%D0%9D..pdfbogdan faulphysicalismlaws of naturefree will
spellingShingle D. N. Razeev
On derivative consequence argument
Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность"
bogdan faul
physicalism
laws of nature
free will
title On derivative consequence argument
title_full On derivative consequence argument
title_fullStr On derivative consequence argument
title_full_unstemmed On derivative consequence argument
title_short On derivative consequence argument
title_sort on derivative consequence argument
topic bogdan faul
physicalism
laws of nature
free will
url https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2020/%D0%A2.%205,%20%E2%84%96%204%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/66-68%20%D0%A0%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B5%D0%B5%D0%B2%20%D0%94.%20%D0%9D..pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dnrazeev onderivativeconsequenceargument