Heterogeneous material models for finite element analysis of the human mandible bone – A systematic review
Subject-specific finite element (FE) modeling of the mandible bone has recently gained attention for its higher accuracy. A critical modeling factor is including personalized material properties from medical images especially when bone quality has to be respected. However, there is no consensus on t...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Heliyon |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024166996 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850250195826114560 |
|---|---|
| author | Iman Soodmand Ann-Kristin Becker Jan-Oliver Sass Christopher Jabs Maeruan Kebbach Gesa Wanke Michael Dau Rainer Bader |
| author_facet | Iman Soodmand Ann-Kristin Becker Jan-Oliver Sass Christopher Jabs Maeruan Kebbach Gesa Wanke Michael Dau Rainer Bader |
| author_sort | Iman Soodmand |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Subject-specific finite element (FE) modeling of the mandible bone has recently gained attention for its higher accuracy. A critical modeling factor is including personalized material properties from medical images especially when bone quality has to be respected. However, there is no consensus on the material model for the mandible that realistically estimates the Young's modulus of the bone. Therefore, the present study aims to review FE studies employing heterogeneous material modeling of the human mandible bone, synthesizing these models, investigating their origins, and assessing their risk of bias.A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines was conducted on publications before 1st July 2024, involving PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search string considered (a) anatomical site (b) modeling strategy, and (c) metrics of interest. Two inclusion and five exclusion criteria were defined.A review of 77 FE studies identified 12 distinct heterogeneous material models, built based on different in vitro or computational methodologies leading to varied performance and highly deviated range of estimated Young's modulus. They are proposed for bones from five different anatomical sites than mandible and for both trabecular and cortical bone domains. The original studies were characterized with a low to medium risk of bias.This review assessed the current state of material modeling for subject-specific FE models in the craniomaxillofacial field. Recommendations are provided to support researchers in selecting density-modulus relationships. Future research should focus on standardizing experimental protocols, validating models through combined simulation and experimental approaches, and investigating the anisotropic behaviour of the mandible bone. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-acbbfba03a0f4f27b99f370a06ef66eb |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2405-8440 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Heliyon |
| spelling | doaj-art-acbbfba03a0f4f27b99f370a06ef66eb2025-08-20T01:58:16ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402024-12-011024e4066810.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40668Heterogeneous material models for finite element analysis of the human mandible bone – A systematic reviewIman Soodmand0Ann-Kristin Becker1Jan-Oliver Sass2Christopher Jabs3Maeruan Kebbach4Gesa Wanke5Michael Dau6Rainer Bader7Research Laboratory for Biomechanics and Implant Technology, Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany; Corresponding author. Doberaner Straße 142, 18057 Rostock, Germany.Research Laboratory for Biomechanics and Implant Technology, Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, GermanyResearch Laboratory for Biomechanics and Implant Technology, Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, GermanyResearch Laboratory for Biomechanics and Implant Technology, Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, GermanyResearch Laboratory for Biomechanics and Implant Technology, Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, GermanyResearch Laboratory for Biomechanics and Implant Technology, Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, GermanyDepartment of Oral, Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, GermanyResearch Laboratory for Biomechanics and Implant Technology, Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, GermanySubject-specific finite element (FE) modeling of the mandible bone has recently gained attention for its higher accuracy. A critical modeling factor is including personalized material properties from medical images especially when bone quality has to be respected. However, there is no consensus on the material model for the mandible that realistically estimates the Young's modulus of the bone. Therefore, the present study aims to review FE studies employing heterogeneous material modeling of the human mandible bone, synthesizing these models, investigating their origins, and assessing their risk of bias.A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines was conducted on publications before 1st July 2024, involving PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search string considered (a) anatomical site (b) modeling strategy, and (c) metrics of interest. Two inclusion and five exclusion criteria were defined.A review of 77 FE studies identified 12 distinct heterogeneous material models, built based on different in vitro or computational methodologies leading to varied performance and highly deviated range of estimated Young's modulus. They are proposed for bones from five different anatomical sites than mandible and for both trabecular and cortical bone domains. The original studies were characterized with a low to medium risk of bias.This review assessed the current state of material modeling for subject-specific FE models in the craniomaxillofacial field. Recommendations are provided to support researchers in selecting density-modulus relationships. Future research should focus on standardizing experimental protocols, validating models through combined simulation and experimental approaches, and investigating the anisotropic behaviour of the mandible bone.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024166996Personalized finite element modelMandibleHeterogeneous mechanical propertiesHounsfield unitsDensityElastic modulus |
| spellingShingle | Iman Soodmand Ann-Kristin Becker Jan-Oliver Sass Christopher Jabs Maeruan Kebbach Gesa Wanke Michael Dau Rainer Bader Heterogeneous material models for finite element analysis of the human mandible bone – A systematic review Heliyon Personalized finite element model Mandible Heterogeneous mechanical properties Hounsfield units Density Elastic modulus |
| title | Heterogeneous material models for finite element analysis of the human mandible bone – A systematic review |
| title_full | Heterogeneous material models for finite element analysis of the human mandible bone – A systematic review |
| title_fullStr | Heterogeneous material models for finite element analysis of the human mandible bone – A systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Heterogeneous material models for finite element analysis of the human mandible bone – A systematic review |
| title_short | Heterogeneous material models for finite element analysis of the human mandible bone – A systematic review |
| title_sort | heterogeneous material models for finite element analysis of the human mandible bone a systematic review |
| topic | Personalized finite element model Mandible Heterogeneous mechanical properties Hounsfield units Density Elastic modulus |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024166996 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT imansoodmand heterogeneousmaterialmodelsforfiniteelementanalysisofthehumanmandibleboneasystematicreview AT annkristinbecker heterogeneousmaterialmodelsforfiniteelementanalysisofthehumanmandibleboneasystematicreview AT janoliversass heterogeneousmaterialmodelsforfiniteelementanalysisofthehumanmandibleboneasystematicreview AT christopherjabs heterogeneousmaterialmodelsforfiniteelementanalysisofthehumanmandibleboneasystematicreview AT maeruankebbach heterogeneousmaterialmodelsforfiniteelementanalysisofthehumanmandibleboneasystematicreview AT gesawanke heterogeneousmaterialmodelsforfiniteelementanalysisofthehumanmandibleboneasystematicreview AT michaeldau heterogeneousmaterialmodelsforfiniteelementanalysisofthehumanmandibleboneasystematicreview AT rainerbader heterogeneousmaterialmodelsforfiniteelementanalysisofthehumanmandibleboneasystematicreview |