Refined Modeling of Geoeffective Fast Halo CMEs During Solar Cycle 24

Abstract The propagation of geoeffective fast halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) from solar cycle 24 has been investigated using the European Heliospheric Forecasting Information Asset (EUHFORIA), ENLIL, Drag‐Based Model (DBM) and Effective Acceleration Model (EAM) models. For an objective compariso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Yordanova, M. Temmer, M. Dumbović, C. Scolini, E. Paouris, A. L. E. Werner, A. P. Dimmock, L. Sorriso‐Valvo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003497
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536509854875648
author E. Yordanova
M. Temmer
M. Dumbović
C. Scolini
E. Paouris
A. L. E. Werner
A. P. Dimmock
L. Sorriso‐Valvo
author_facet E. Yordanova
M. Temmer
M. Dumbović
C. Scolini
E. Paouris
A. L. E. Werner
A. P. Dimmock
L. Sorriso‐Valvo
author_sort E. Yordanova
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The propagation of geoeffective fast halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) from solar cycle 24 has been investigated using the European Heliospheric Forecasting Information Asset (EUHFORIA), ENLIL, Drag‐Based Model (DBM) and Effective Acceleration Model (EAM) models. For an objective comparison, a unified set of a small sample of CME events with similar characteristics has been selected. The same CME kinematic parameters have been used as input in the propagation models to compare their predicted arrival times and the speed of the interplanetary (IP) shocks associated with the CMEs. The performance assessment has been based on the application of an identical set of metrics. First, the modeling of the events has been done with default input concerning the background solar wind, as would be used in operations. The obtained CME arrival forecast deviates from the observations at L1, with a general underestimation of the arrival time and overestimation of the impact speed (mean absolute error [MAE]: 9.8 ± 1.8–14.6 ± 2.3 hr and 178 ± 22–376 ± 54 km/s). To address this discrepancy, we refine the models by simple changes of the density ratio (dcld) between the CME and IP space in the numerical, and the IP drag (γ) in the analytical models. This approach resulted in a reduced MAE in the forecast for the arrival time of 8.6 ± 2.2–13.5 ± 2.2 hr and the impact speed of 51 ± 6–243 ± 45 km/s. In addition, we performed multi‐CME runs to simulate potential interactions. This leads, to even larger uncertainties in the forecast. Based on this study we suggest simple adjustments in the operational settings for improving the forecast of fast halo CMEs.
format Article
id doaj-art-ac96660fd1f845a98ed064df5ce3df42
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-ac96660fd1f845a98ed064df5ce3df422025-01-14T16:26:56ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902024-01-01221n/an/a10.1029/2023SW003497Refined Modeling of Geoeffective Fast Halo CMEs During Solar Cycle 24E. Yordanova0M. Temmer1M. Dumbović2C. Scolini3E. Paouris4A. L. E. Werner5A. P. Dimmock6L. Sorriso‐Valvo7Swedish Institute of Space Physics Uppsala SwedenInstitute of Physics University of Graz Graz AustriaHvar Observatory Faculty of Geodesy University of Zagreb Zagreb CroatiaRoyal Observatory of Belgium Brussels BelgiumDepartment of Physics and Astronomy George Mason University Fairfax VA USASwedish Institute of Space Physics Uppsala SwedenSwedish Institute of Space Physics Uppsala SwedenSwedish Institute of Space Physics Uppsala SwedenAbstract The propagation of geoeffective fast halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) from solar cycle 24 has been investigated using the European Heliospheric Forecasting Information Asset (EUHFORIA), ENLIL, Drag‐Based Model (DBM) and Effective Acceleration Model (EAM) models. For an objective comparison, a unified set of a small sample of CME events with similar characteristics has been selected. The same CME kinematic parameters have been used as input in the propagation models to compare their predicted arrival times and the speed of the interplanetary (IP) shocks associated with the CMEs. The performance assessment has been based on the application of an identical set of metrics. First, the modeling of the events has been done with default input concerning the background solar wind, as would be used in operations. The obtained CME arrival forecast deviates from the observations at L1, with a general underestimation of the arrival time and overestimation of the impact speed (mean absolute error [MAE]: 9.8 ± 1.8–14.6 ± 2.3 hr and 178 ± 22–376 ± 54 km/s). To address this discrepancy, we refine the models by simple changes of the density ratio (dcld) between the CME and IP space in the numerical, and the IP drag (γ) in the analytical models. This approach resulted in a reduced MAE in the forecast for the arrival time of 8.6 ± 2.2–13.5 ± 2.2 hr and the impact speed of 51 ± 6–243 ± 45 km/s. In addition, we performed multi‐CME runs to simulate potential interactions. This leads, to even larger uncertainties in the forecast. Based on this study we suggest simple adjustments in the operational settings for improving the forecast of fast halo CMEs.https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003497halo CMEbackground solar windCME arrival timeCME impact speedspace weather forecast
spellingShingle E. Yordanova
M. Temmer
M. Dumbović
C. Scolini
E. Paouris
A. L. E. Werner
A. P. Dimmock
L. Sorriso‐Valvo
Refined Modeling of Geoeffective Fast Halo CMEs During Solar Cycle 24
Space Weather
halo CME
background solar wind
CME arrival time
CME impact speed
space weather forecast
title Refined Modeling of Geoeffective Fast Halo CMEs During Solar Cycle 24
title_full Refined Modeling of Geoeffective Fast Halo CMEs During Solar Cycle 24
title_fullStr Refined Modeling of Geoeffective Fast Halo CMEs During Solar Cycle 24
title_full_unstemmed Refined Modeling of Geoeffective Fast Halo CMEs During Solar Cycle 24
title_short Refined Modeling of Geoeffective Fast Halo CMEs During Solar Cycle 24
title_sort refined modeling of geoeffective fast halo cmes during solar cycle 24
topic halo CME
background solar wind
CME arrival time
CME impact speed
space weather forecast
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003497
work_keys_str_mv AT eyordanova refinedmodelingofgeoeffectivefasthalocmesduringsolarcycle24
AT mtemmer refinedmodelingofgeoeffectivefasthalocmesduringsolarcycle24
AT mdumbovic refinedmodelingofgeoeffectivefasthalocmesduringsolarcycle24
AT cscolini refinedmodelingofgeoeffectivefasthalocmesduringsolarcycle24
AT epaouris refinedmodelingofgeoeffectivefasthalocmesduringsolarcycle24
AT alewerner refinedmodelingofgeoeffectivefasthalocmesduringsolarcycle24
AT apdimmock refinedmodelingofgeoeffectivefasthalocmesduringsolarcycle24
AT lsorrisovalvo refinedmodelingofgeoeffectivefasthalocmesduringsolarcycle24