Economic burden of avoidable blindness due to diabetic macular edema in Ecuador

IntroductionIn Ecuador, the economic burden of diabetes-related visual impairment has not been studied cohesively. More evidence—that takes into account lost productivity, direct costs, and intangible costs—is required to support public policies that prevent and treat diabetes-related visual impairm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruth Lucio, Juan Antonio Teran, Paula Luque
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1476932/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849718162621202432
author Ruth Lucio
Juan Antonio Teran
Paula Luque
author_facet Ruth Lucio
Juan Antonio Teran
Paula Luque
author_sort Ruth Lucio
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionIn Ecuador, the economic burden of diabetes-related visual impairment has not been studied cohesively. More evidence—that takes into account lost productivity, direct costs, and intangible costs—is required to support public policies that prevent and treat diabetes-related visual impairment.ObjectiveThe purpose of this research is to estimate the economic burden of avoidable blindness due to diabetic macular edema in Ecuador.MethodsCosts were estimated in a one-year, retrospective, cost-of-illness study focusing on two groups of people. The first group contains those that have become blind because of a lack of timely medical treatment for diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). The second group contains those that could avoid blindness by receiving timely treatment. Productivity costs are costs associated with lost ability to work due to death, and with impaired (or lost) ability to work or to engage in leisure activities due to morbidity. Direct costs include direct healthcare costs and direct non-healthcare costs, i.e., costs incurred by patients and caregivers in the complete treatment of the disease. Intangible costs are a conceptual cost-compound which takes into account psychological aspects of disease such as anxiety/distress, and stigmatization.ResultsIn the year 2023, treating blindness caused by diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema represents a yearly expense of USD 259.7 million—92.4% can be attributed to productivity costs. Preventing blindness caused by diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema represents a yearly expense of USD 108.5 million—73.8% corresponds to costs of resources used in interventions for health promotion and disease prevention, only 26.2% corresponds to medical treatment. The difference between these two scenarios is 151.2 million; in other words, the cost of treating a person that has become disabled costs USD 33,518.98 more per year than trying to prevent the disability.ConclusionThe cost to society of providing timely treatment for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema is significantly less than the cost of supporting a person that has become blind due to lack of treatment. Thus, it would be prudent to invest in public policies that prevent and treat diabetes-related visual impairment.
format Article
id doaj-art-ac51d44d6318414ba2c70c6c828eeca7
institution DOAJ
issn 2296-2565
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Public Health
spelling doaj-art-ac51d44d6318414ba2c70c6c828eeca72025-08-20T03:12:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652025-07-011310.3389/fpubh.2025.14769321476932Economic burden of avoidable blindness due to diabetic macular edema in EcuadorRuth Lucio0Juan Antonio Teran1Paula Luque2Sureste Research Group in Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Quito, EcuadorSureste Research Group in Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Quito, EcuadorRoche Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Clínica (SAIC), Buenos Aires, ArgentinaIntroductionIn Ecuador, the economic burden of diabetes-related visual impairment has not been studied cohesively. More evidence—that takes into account lost productivity, direct costs, and intangible costs—is required to support public policies that prevent and treat diabetes-related visual impairment.ObjectiveThe purpose of this research is to estimate the economic burden of avoidable blindness due to diabetic macular edema in Ecuador.MethodsCosts were estimated in a one-year, retrospective, cost-of-illness study focusing on two groups of people. The first group contains those that have become blind because of a lack of timely medical treatment for diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). The second group contains those that could avoid blindness by receiving timely treatment. Productivity costs are costs associated with lost ability to work due to death, and with impaired (or lost) ability to work or to engage in leisure activities due to morbidity. Direct costs include direct healthcare costs and direct non-healthcare costs, i.e., costs incurred by patients and caregivers in the complete treatment of the disease. Intangible costs are a conceptual cost-compound which takes into account psychological aspects of disease such as anxiety/distress, and stigmatization.ResultsIn the year 2023, treating blindness caused by diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema represents a yearly expense of USD 259.7 million—92.4% can be attributed to productivity costs. Preventing blindness caused by diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema represents a yearly expense of USD 108.5 million—73.8% corresponds to costs of resources used in interventions for health promotion and disease prevention, only 26.2% corresponds to medical treatment. The difference between these two scenarios is 151.2 million; in other words, the cost of treating a person that has become disabled costs USD 33,518.98 more per year than trying to prevent the disability.ConclusionThe cost to society of providing timely treatment for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema is significantly less than the cost of supporting a person that has become blind due to lack of treatment. Thus, it would be prudent to invest in public policies that prevent and treat diabetes-related visual impairment.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1476932/fulleconomic burdendiabetic retinopathydiabetic macular edemablindnesscost comparisonEcuador
spellingShingle Ruth Lucio
Juan Antonio Teran
Paula Luque
Economic burden of avoidable blindness due to diabetic macular edema in Ecuador
Frontiers in Public Health
economic burden
diabetic retinopathy
diabetic macular edema
blindness
cost comparison
Ecuador
title Economic burden of avoidable blindness due to diabetic macular edema in Ecuador
title_full Economic burden of avoidable blindness due to diabetic macular edema in Ecuador
title_fullStr Economic burden of avoidable blindness due to diabetic macular edema in Ecuador
title_full_unstemmed Economic burden of avoidable blindness due to diabetic macular edema in Ecuador
title_short Economic burden of avoidable blindness due to diabetic macular edema in Ecuador
title_sort economic burden of avoidable blindness due to diabetic macular edema in ecuador
topic economic burden
diabetic retinopathy
diabetic macular edema
blindness
cost comparison
Ecuador
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1476932/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ruthlucio economicburdenofavoidableblindnessduetodiabeticmacularedemainecuador
AT juanantonioteran economicburdenofavoidableblindnessduetodiabeticmacularedemainecuador
AT paulaluque economicburdenofavoidableblindnessduetodiabeticmacularedemainecuador