A comparative study of student performance in all-ceramic crown preparation by clinical-phase students

Abstract Background Given ongoing discussions about potential gender disparities in clinical skill assessments within dental education, this study aimed to evaluate whether an analytic rubric could provide objective, equitable evaluation of all-ceramic crown preparations among male and female dental...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdulkarim H. Alshehri, Mohammed M. Al Moaleem, Abdullah Ahmed Meshni, Thrya S. Gadah, Nasser M. Alahmari, Nassreen H. Albar, Hafiz Ahmed A. Adawi, Bandar M. A. AL-Makramani, Mosa A. Shubayr, Kulashekar Reddy Nandalur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07512-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849764035452469248
author Abdulkarim H. Alshehri
Mohammed M. Al Moaleem
Abdullah Ahmed Meshni
Thrya S. Gadah
Nasser M. Alahmari
Nassreen H. Albar
Hafiz Ahmed A. Adawi
Bandar M. A. AL-Makramani
Mosa A. Shubayr
Kulashekar Reddy Nandalur
author_facet Abdulkarim H. Alshehri
Mohammed M. Al Moaleem
Abdullah Ahmed Meshni
Thrya S. Gadah
Nasser M. Alahmari
Nassreen H. Albar
Hafiz Ahmed A. Adawi
Bandar M. A. AL-Makramani
Mosa A. Shubayr
Kulashekar Reddy Nandalur
author_sort Abdulkarim H. Alshehri
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Given ongoing discussions about potential gender disparities in clinical skill assessments within dental education, this study aimed to evaluate whether an analytic rubric could provide objective, equitable evaluation of all-ceramic crown preparations among male and female dental students. Materials and methods An analytical rubric for the evaluation of all-ceramic preparation steps was utilized in a clinical course study with two evaluators. The scoring was created on a 5-point scale for three parameters (preparation, tissue management, final impression) and a 4-point scale for the time management parameter, and the overall score was considered as 39 points. Variances in rubric parameter scores among male and female students were examined via an independent t test. Additional tests, such as the kappa test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient, were utilized to measure the connotations between the cumulative grade point average (CGPA), evaluators, and gender of the participants. The value of p was set as < 0.05 and considered statistically significant. Results The overall score was very good and almost equal for males (31.03) and females (31.00), with no statistically significant differences in most rubric parameters between students or as recorded by both evaluators (p > 0.05). The highest value was for tissue management (4.38 males, 4.22 females), and the lowest value was for time management (3.50 males, 3.44 females). Amongst the other assessed parameters, only the final impression parameter was significantly different (p = 0.006). Inter-evaluator agreement analysis exposed changing levels of agreement among the assessors. High and strong positive correlations were documented among numerous rubric parameters, but CGPA had a weak, nonsignificant correlation with their clinical performance (p = 0.160). Conclusion The findings demonstrate that structured analytic rubrics can yield consistent, gender-neutral assessments of clinical skills, supporting their use in promoting equitable competency evaluation in dental education. This is particularly relevant for institutions with gender-separated training programs, where standardized tools help mitigate potential biases.
format Article
id doaj-art-ac4ff21e24fc4b48bdfdedb84bbac5fe
institution DOAJ
issn 1472-6920
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Education
spelling doaj-art-ac4ff21e24fc4b48bdfdedb84bbac5fe2025-08-20T03:05:14ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202025-07-0125111410.1186/s12909-025-07512-0A comparative study of student performance in all-ceramic crown preparation by clinical-phase studentsAbdulkarim H. Alshehri0Mohammed M. Al Moaleem1Abdullah Ahmed Meshni2Thrya S. Gadah3Nasser M. Alahmari4Nassreen H. Albar5Hafiz Ahmed A. Adawi6Bandar M. A. AL-Makramani7Mosa A. Shubayr8Kulashekar Reddy Nandalur9Department of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan UniversityDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan UniversityDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan UniversityDepartment of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid UniversityDepartment of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid UniversityRestorative Dental Science Department, College of Dentistry, Jazan UniversityDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan UniversityDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan UniversityDevision of Dental Public Health, Preventive Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, Jazan UniversityDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan UniversityAbstract Background Given ongoing discussions about potential gender disparities in clinical skill assessments within dental education, this study aimed to evaluate whether an analytic rubric could provide objective, equitable evaluation of all-ceramic crown preparations among male and female dental students. Materials and methods An analytical rubric for the evaluation of all-ceramic preparation steps was utilized in a clinical course study with two evaluators. The scoring was created on a 5-point scale for three parameters (preparation, tissue management, final impression) and a 4-point scale for the time management parameter, and the overall score was considered as 39 points. Variances in rubric parameter scores among male and female students were examined via an independent t test. Additional tests, such as the kappa test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient, were utilized to measure the connotations between the cumulative grade point average (CGPA), evaluators, and gender of the participants. The value of p was set as < 0.05 and considered statistically significant. Results The overall score was very good and almost equal for males (31.03) and females (31.00), with no statistically significant differences in most rubric parameters between students or as recorded by both evaluators (p > 0.05). The highest value was for tissue management (4.38 males, 4.22 females), and the lowest value was for time management (3.50 males, 3.44 females). Amongst the other assessed parameters, only the final impression parameter was significantly different (p = 0.006). Inter-evaluator agreement analysis exposed changing levels of agreement among the assessors. High and strong positive correlations were documented among numerous rubric parameters, but CGPA had a weak, nonsignificant correlation with their clinical performance (p = 0.160). Conclusion The findings demonstrate that structured analytic rubrics can yield consistent, gender-neutral assessments of clinical skills, supporting their use in promoting equitable competency evaluation in dental education. This is particularly relevant for institutions with gender-separated training programs, where standardized tools help mitigate potential biases.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07512-0Clinical dental studentsAnalytical rubricDental educationCeramic crown
spellingShingle Abdulkarim H. Alshehri
Mohammed M. Al Moaleem
Abdullah Ahmed Meshni
Thrya S. Gadah
Nasser M. Alahmari
Nassreen H. Albar
Hafiz Ahmed A. Adawi
Bandar M. A. AL-Makramani
Mosa A. Shubayr
Kulashekar Reddy Nandalur
A comparative study of student performance in all-ceramic crown preparation by clinical-phase students
BMC Medical Education
Clinical dental students
Analytical rubric
Dental education
Ceramic crown
title A comparative study of student performance in all-ceramic crown preparation by clinical-phase students
title_full A comparative study of student performance in all-ceramic crown preparation by clinical-phase students
title_fullStr A comparative study of student performance in all-ceramic crown preparation by clinical-phase students
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of student performance in all-ceramic crown preparation by clinical-phase students
title_short A comparative study of student performance in all-ceramic crown preparation by clinical-phase students
title_sort comparative study of student performance in all ceramic crown preparation by clinical phase students
topic Clinical dental students
Analytical rubric
Dental education
Ceramic crown
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07512-0
work_keys_str_mv AT abdulkarimhalshehri acomparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT mohammedmalmoaleem acomparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT abdullahahmedmeshni acomparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT thryasgadah acomparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT nassermalahmari acomparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT nassreenhalbar acomparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT hafizahmedaadawi acomparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT bandarmaalmakramani acomparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT mosaashubayr acomparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT kulashekarreddynandalur acomparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT abdulkarimhalshehri comparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT mohammedmalmoaleem comparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT abdullahahmedmeshni comparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT thryasgadah comparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT nassermalahmari comparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT nassreenhalbar comparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT hafizahmedaadawi comparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT bandarmaalmakramani comparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT mosaashubayr comparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents
AT kulashekarreddynandalur comparativestudyofstudentperformanceinallceramiccrownpreparationbyclinicalphasestudents