An international comparison of longitudinal health data collected on long COVID in nine high income countries: a qualitative data analysis

Abstract Background Long coronavirus disease (COVID) presents a significant health challenge. Long-term monitoring is critical to support understanding of the condition, service planning and evaluation. We sought to identify and examine longitudinal health data collected on long COVID to inform pote...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Josephine Exley, Edmund Stubbs, Raphael Wittenberg, Nicholas Mays
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-03-01
Series:Health Research Policy and Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01298-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850207974051545088
author Josephine Exley
Edmund Stubbs
Raphael Wittenberg
Nicholas Mays
author_facet Josephine Exley
Edmund Stubbs
Raphael Wittenberg
Nicholas Mays
author_sort Josephine Exley
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Long coronavirus disease (COVID) presents a significant health challenge. Long-term monitoring is critical to support understanding of the condition, service planning and evaluation. We sought to identify and examine longitudinal health data collected on long COVID to inform potential decisions in England regarding the rationale for data collection, the data collected, the sources from which data were collected and the methods used for collection. Methods We included datasets in high-income countries that experienced similar coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) waves to England pre-vaccine rollout. Relevant datasets were identified through literature searches, the authors’ networks and participants’ recommendations. We undertook semi-structured interviews with individuals involved in the development and running of the datasets. We held a focus group discussion with representatives of three long COVID patient organisations to capture the perspective of those with long COVID. Emergent findings were tested in a workshop with country interviewees. Results We analysed 17 datasets from nine countries (Belgium, Canada, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom). Datasets sampled different populations, used different data collection tools and measured different outcomes, reflecting different priorities. Most data collection was research (rather than health care system)-funded and time-limited. For datasets linked to specialist services, there was uncertainty surrounding how long these would continue. Definitions of long COVID varied. Patient representatives’ favoured self-identification, given challenges in accessing care and receiving a diagnosis; New Zealand’s long COVID registry was the only example identified using this approach. Post-exertion malaise, identified by patients as a critical outcome, was absent from all datasets. The lack of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was highlighted as a limitation of datasets reliant on routine health data, although some had developed mechanisms to extend data collection using patient surveys. Conclusions Addressing research questions related to the management of long COVID requires diverse data sources that capture different populations with long COVID over the long-term. No country examined has developed a comprehensive long-term data system for long COVID, and, in many settings, data collection is ending leaving a gap. There is no obvious model for England or other countries to follow, assuming there remains sufficient policy interest in establishing a long-term long COVID patient registry.
format Article
id doaj-art-ac1a49c8ecf2479fa57d8bdeea8a63ea
institution OA Journals
issn 1478-4505
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Health Research Policy and Systems
spelling doaj-art-ac1a49c8ecf2479fa57d8bdeea8a63ea2025-08-20T02:10:20ZengBMCHealth Research Policy and Systems1478-45052025-03-0123112810.1186/s12961-025-01298-9An international comparison of longitudinal health data collected on long COVID in nine high income countries: a qualitative data analysisJosephine Exley0Edmund Stubbs1Raphael Wittenberg2Nicholas Mays3NIHR Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit (PIRU), Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineNIHR Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit (PIRU), Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political ScienceNIHR Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit (PIRU), Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political ScienceNIHR Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit (PIRU), Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineAbstract Background Long coronavirus disease (COVID) presents a significant health challenge. Long-term monitoring is critical to support understanding of the condition, service planning and evaluation. We sought to identify and examine longitudinal health data collected on long COVID to inform potential decisions in England regarding the rationale for data collection, the data collected, the sources from which data were collected and the methods used for collection. Methods We included datasets in high-income countries that experienced similar coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) waves to England pre-vaccine rollout. Relevant datasets were identified through literature searches, the authors’ networks and participants’ recommendations. We undertook semi-structured interviews with individuals involved in the development and running of the datasets. We held a focus group discussion with representatives of three long COVID patient organisations to capture the perspective of those with long COVID. Emergent findings were tested in a workshop with country interviewees. Results We analysed 17 datasets from nine countries (Belgium, Canada, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom). Datasets sampled different populations, used different data collection tools and measured different outcomes, reflecting different priorities. Most data collection was research (rather than health care system)-funded and time-limited. For datasets linked to specialist services, there was uncertainty surrounding how long these would continue. Definitions of long COVID varied. Patient representatives’ favoured self-identification, given challenges in accessing care and receiving a diagnosis; New Zealand’s long COVID registry was the only example identified using this approach. Post-exertion malaise, identified by patients as a critical outcome, was absent from all datasets. The lack of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was highlighted as a limitation of datasets reliant on routine health data, although some had developed mechanisms to extend data collection using patient surveys. Conclusions Addressing research questions related to the management of long COVID requires diverse data sources that capture different populations with long COVID over the long-term. No country examined has developed a comprehensive long-term data system for long COVID, and, in many settings, data collection is ending leaving a gap. There is no obvious model for England or other countries to follow, assuming there remains sufficient policy interest in establishing a long-term long COVID patient registry.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01298-9Long COVIDPost COVID-19 syndromeHealth monitoring systemsHealth research data and infrastructureLongitudinal health dataHealth registries
spellingShingle Josephine Exley
Edmund Stubbs
Raphael Wittenberg
Nicholas Mays
An international comparison of longitudinal health data collected on long COVID in nine high income countries: a qualitative data analysis
Health Research Policy and Systems
Long COVID
Post COVID-19 syndrome
Health monitoring systems
Health research data and infrastructure
Longitudinal health data
Health registries
title An international comparison of longitudinal health data collected on long COVID in nine high income countries: a qualitative data analysis
title_full An international comparison of longitudinal health data collected on long COVID in nine high income countries: a qualitative data analysis
title_fullStr An international comparison of longitudinal health data collected on long COVID in nine high income countries: a qualitative data analysis
title_full_unstemmed An international comparison of longitudinal health data collected on long COVID in nine high income countries: a qualitative data analysis
title_short An international comparison of longitudinal health data collected on long COVID in nine high income countries: a qualitative data analysis
title_sort international comparison of longitudinal health data collected on long covid in nine high income countries a qualitative data analysis
topic Long COVID
Post COVID-19 syndrome
Health monitoring systems
Health research data and infrastructure
Longitudinal health data
Health registries
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01298-9
work_keys_str_mv AT josephineexley aninternationalcomparisonoflongitudinalhealthdatacollectedonlongcovidinninehighincomecountriesaqualitativedataanalysis
AT edmundstubbs aninternationalcomparisonoflongitudinalhealthdatacollectedonlongcovidinninehighincomecountriesaqualitativedataanalysis
AT raphaelwittenberg aninternationalcomparisonoflongitudinalhealthdatacollectedonlongcovidinninehighincomecountriesaqualitativedataanalysis
AT nicholasmays aninternationalcomparisonoflongitudinalhealthdatacollectedonlongcovidinninehighincomecountriesaqualitativedataanalysis
AT josephineexley internationalcomparisonoflongitudinalhealthdatacollectedonlongcovidinninehighincomecountriesaqualitativedataanalysis
AT edmundstubbs internationalcomparisonoflongitudinalhealthdatacollectedonlongcovidinninehighincomecountriesaqualitativedataanalysis
AT raphaelwittenberg internationalcomparisonoflongitudinalhealthdatacollectedonlongcovidinninehighincomecountriesaqualitativedataanalysis
AT nicholasmays internationalcomparisonoflongitudinalhealthdatacollectedonlongcovidinninehighincomecountriesaqualitativedataanalysis