Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review of Interventions

# Background Proximal hamstring tendinopathy affects athletic and non-athletic populations and is associated with longstanding buttock pain. The condition is common in track and field, long distance running and field-based sports. Management options need to be evaluated to direct appropriate clinica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anthony Michael Nasser, Bill Vicenzino, Alison Grimaldi, Jay Anderson, Adam Ivan Semciw
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North American Sports Medicine Institute 2021-04-01
Series:International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.21250
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825197114980827136
author Anthony Michael Nasser
Bill Vicenzino
Alison Grimaldi
Jay Anderson
Adam Ivan Semciw
author_facet Anthony Michael Nasser
Bill Vicenzino
Alison Grimaldi
Jay Anderson
Adam Ivan Semciw
author_sort Anthony Michael Nasser
collection DOAJ
description # Background Proximal hamstring tendinopathy affects athletic and non-athletic populations and is associated with longstanding buttock pain. The condition is common in track and field, long distance running and field-based sports. Management options need to be evaluated to direct appropriate clinical management. # Purpose/Hypothesis To evaluate surgical and non-surgical interventions used in managing proximal hamstring tendinopathy. # Study design Systematic review # Methods Electronic databases were searched to January 2019. Studies (all designs) investigating interventions for people with proximal hamstring tendinopathy were eligible. Outcomes included symptoms, physical function, quality of life and adverse events. Studies were screened for risk of bias. Reporting quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (Randomized Controlled Trials \[RCT\]) and the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist (Case Series). Effect sizes (Standard mean difference or Standard paired difference) of 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8 were considered as small, medium and large respectively. Overall quality of evidence was rated according to GRADE guidelines. # Results Twelve studies (2 RCTs and 10 case series) were included (n=424; males 229). RCTs examined the following interventions: platelet-rich plasma injection (n=1), autologous whole-blood injection (n=1), shockwave therapy (n=1) and multi-modal intervention (n=1). Case series included evaluation of the following interventions: platelet-rich plasma injection (n=3), surgery (n=4), corticosteroid injection (n=2), multi-modal intervention + platelet-rich plasma injection (n=1). Very low-level evidence found shockwave therapy was more effective than a multi-modal intervention, by a large effect on improving symptoms (-3.22 SMD; 95% CI -4.28, -2.16) and physical function (-2.42 SMD; 95% CI-3.33, -1.50) in the long-term. There was very low-level evidence of no difference between autologous whole-blood injection and platelet-rich plasma injection on physical function (0.17 SMD; 95% CI -0.86, 1.21) to (0.24 SMD; 95% CI -0.76, 1.24) and quality of life (-0.04 SMD; 95%CI -1.05, 0.97) in the medium-term. There was very low-quality evidence that surgery resulted in a large reduction in symptoms (-1.89 SPD; 95% CI -2.36, -1.41) to (-6.02 SPD; 95% CI -8.10, -3.94) and physical function (-4.08 SPD; 95%CI -5.53, -2.63) in the long-term. # Conclusions There is insufficient evidence to recommend any one intervention over another. A pragmatic approach would be to initially trial approaches proven successful in other tendinopathies. # Level of evidence Level 2a
format Article
id doaj-art-ac175093123d453aa570490900de80f4
institution Kabale University
issn 2159-2896
language English
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher North American Sports Medicine Institute
record_format Article
series International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
spelling doaj-art-ac175093123d453aa570490900de80f42025-02-11T20:27:04ZengNorth American Sports Medicine InstituteInternational Journal of Sports Physical Therapy2159-28962021-04-01162Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review of InterventionsAnthony Michael NasserBill VicenzinoAlison GrimaldiJay AndersonAdam Ivan Semciw# Background Proximal hamstring tendinopathy affects athletic and non-athletic populations and is associated with longstanding buttock pain. The condition is common in track and field, long distance running and field-based sports. Management options need to be evaluated to direct appropriate clinical management. # Purpose/Hypothesis To evaluate surgical and non-surgical interventions used in managing proximal hamstring tendinopathy. # Study design Systematic review # Methods Electronic databases were searched to January 2019. Studies (all designs) investigating interventions for people with proximal hamstring tendinopathy were eligible. Outcomes included symptoms, physical function, quality of life and adverse events. Studies were screened for risk of bias. Reporting quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (Randomized Controlled Trials \[RCT\]) and the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist (Case Series). Effect sizes (Standard mean difference or Standard paired difference) of 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8 were considered as small, medium and large respectively. Overall quality of evidence was rated according to GRADE guidelines. # Results Twelve studies (2 RCTs and 10 case series) were included (n=424; males 229). RCTs examined the following interventions: platelet-rich plasma injection (n=1), autologous whole-blood injection (n=1), shockwave therapy (n=1) and multi-modal intervention (n=1). Case series included evaluation of the following interventions: platelet-rich plasma injection (n=3), surgery (n=4), corticosteroid injection (n=2), multi-modal intervention + platelet-rich plasma injection (n=1). Very low-level evidence found shockwave therapy was more effective than a multi-modal intervention, by a large effect on improving symptoms (-3.22 SMD; 95% CI -4.28, -2.16) and physical function (-2.42 SMD; 95% CI-3.33, -1.50) in the long-term. There was very low-level evidence of no difference between autologous whole-blood injection and platelet-rich plasma injection on physical function (0.17 SMD; 95% CI -0.86, 1.21) to (0.24 SMD; 95% CI -0.76, 1.24) and quality of life (-0.04 SMD; 95%CI -1.05, 0.97) in the medium-term. There was very low-quality evidence that surgery resulted in a large reduction in symptoms (-1.89 SPD; 95% CI -2.36, -1.41) to (-6.02 SPD; 95% CI -8.10, -3.94) and physical function (-4.08 SPD; 95%CI -5.53, -2.63) in the long-term. # Conclusions There is insufficient evidence to recommend any one intervention over another. A pragmatic approach would be to initially trial approaches proven successful in other tendinopathies. # Level of evidence Level 2ahttps://doi.org/10.26603/001c.21250
spellingShingle Anthony Michael Nasser
Bill Vicenzino
Alison Grimaldi
Jay Anderson
Adam Ivan Semciw
Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review of Interventions
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
title Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review of Interventions
title_full Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review of Interventions
title_fullStr Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review of Interventions
title_full_unstemmed Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review of Interventions
title_short Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review of Interventions
title_sort proximal hamstring tendinopathy a systematic review of interventions
url https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.21250
work_keys_str_mv AT anthonymichaelnasser proximalhamstringtendinopathyasystematicreviewofinterventions
AT billvicenzino proximalhamstringtendinopathyasystematicreviewofinterventions
AT alisongrimaldi proximalhamstringtendinopathyasystematicreviewofinterventions
AT jayanderson proximalhamstringtendinopathyasystematicreviewofinterventions
AT adamivansemciw proximalhamstringtendinopathyasystematicreviewofinterventions