Effect of glycemic control and type of diabetes treatment on TB treatment outcomes among people with TB-diabetes: A systematic review (updated August 2024).

<h4>Background</h4>Stringent glycemic control and/or using insulin either as a replacement for or in addition to oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) has been recommended for people with tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus (TB-DM). This systematic review (PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016039101) analyses...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hemant Deepak Shewade, Prabhadevi Ravichandran, S Satish, S Kiran Pradeep, Kathiresan Jeyashree, Preetam Mahajan, Amar N Shah, Richard Kirubakaran, Ajay M V Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328619
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849712093217947648
author Hemant Deepak Shewade
Prabhadevi Ravichandran
S Satish
S Kiran Pradeep
Kathiresan Jeyashree
Preetam Mahajan
Amar N Shah
Richard Kirubakaran
Ajay M V Kumar
author_facet Hemant Deepak Shewade
Prabhadevi Ravichandran
S Satish
S Kiran Pradeep
Kathiresan Jeyashree
Preetam Mahajan
Amar N Shah
Richard Kirubakaran
Ajay M V Kumar
author_sort Hemant Deepak Shewade
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Stringent glycemic control and/or using insulin either as a replacement for or in addition to oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) has been recommended for people with tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus (TB-DM). This systematic review (PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016039101) analyses whether this improves TB treatment outcomes. This is an updated review (up to August 2024) of a previously published systematic review (1996 - April 2017).<h4>Objectives</h4>Among people with drug-susceptible TB-DM on anti-TB treatment, to determine the effect of i) glycemic control (stringent or less stringent) compared to poor glycemic control and ii) insulin (only or with OHAs) compared to 'OHAs only' on unfavorable TB treatment outcome(s) at the end of intensive phase and/ or end of TB treatment (minimum six months and maximum 12 months follow up).<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted comprehensive searches across multiple databases (EMBASE, PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) and sources. Eligible studies included interventional and cohort studies examining people with TB-DM. Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were done independently by two investigators and recourse to a third investigator, for resolution of differences.<h4>Results</h4>From a total of 7107 articles, we included 14 studies, with five added in this update (all observational cohort studies). Of 14, only one high-quality study reported that stringent glycemic control (HbA1c < 7% at baseline) was associated with lower risk of unfavorable treatment outcomes, including recurrence, compared to non-stringent and/or poor glycemic control. Other studies showed mixed results and had significant biases or were limited by sample size. The five newly included studies had a high risk of bias and did not provide clear evidence. Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, we did not perform a meta-analysis.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The updated review re-emphasizes the need for high-quality research on the effects of glycemic control and addition of insulin among people with TB-DM on TB treatment outcomes. We need well-designed randomized controlled trials, specifically for the effect of adding insulin on TB treatment outcomes. We discuss ten measures to guide well-designed cohort studies on this topic. Harmonization of the methods is needed and would facilitate comparisons.
format Article
id doaj-art-ac01aadea5784b2aa699e0f42da1b92b
institution DOAJ
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-ac01aadea5784b2aa699e0f42da1b92b2025-08-20T03:14:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01207e032861910.1371/journal.pone.0328619Effect of glycemic control and type of diabetes treatment on TB treatment outcomes among people with TB-diabetes: A systematic review (updated August 2024).Hemant Deepak ShewadePrabhadevi RavichandranS SatishS Kiran PradeepKathiresan JeyashreePreetam MahajanAmar N ShahRichard KirubakaranAjay M V Kumar<h4>Background</h4>Stringent glycemic control and/or using insulin either as a replacement for or in addition to oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) has been recommended for people with tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus (TB-DM). This systematic review (PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016039101) analyses whether this improves TB treatment outcomes. This is an updated review (up to August 2024) of a previously published systematic review (1996 - April 2017).<h4>Objectives</h4>Among people with drug-susceptible TB-DM on anti-TB treatment, to determine the effect of i) glycemic control (stringent or less stringent) compared to poor glycemic control and ii) insulin (only or with OHAs) compared to 'OHAs only' on unfavorable TB treatment outcome(s) at the end of intensive phase and/ or end of TB treatment (minimum six months and maximum 12 months follow up).<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted comprehensive searches across multiple databases (EMBASE, PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) and sources. Eligible studies included interventional and cohort studies examining people with TB-DM. Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were done independently by two investigators and recourse to a third investigator, for resolution of differences.<h4>Results</h4>From a total of 7107 articles, we included 14 studies, with five added in this update (all observational cohort studies). Of 14, only one high-quality study reported that stringent glycemic control (HbA1c < 7% at baseline) was associated with lower risk of unfavorable treatment outcomes, including recurrence, compared to non-stringent and/or poor glycemic control. Other studies showed mixed results and had significant biases or were limited by sample size. The five newly included studies had a high risk of bias and did not provide clear evidence. Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, we did not perform a meta-analysis.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The updated review re-emphasizes the need for high-quality research on the effects of glycemic control and addition of insulin among people with TB-DM on TB treatment outcomes. We need well-designed randomized controlled trials, specifically for the effect of adding insulin on TB treatment outcomes. We discuss ten measures to guide well-designed cohort studies on this topic. Harmonization of the methods is needed and would facilitate comparisons.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328619
spellingShingle Hemant Deepak Shewade
Prabhadevi Ravichandran
S Satish
S Kiran Pradeep
Kathiresan Jeyashree
Preetam Mahajan
Amar N Shah
Richard Kirubakaran
Ajay M V Kumar
Effect of glycemic control and type of diabetes treatment on TB treatment outcomes among people with TB-diabetes: A systematic review (updated August 2024).
PLoS ONE
title Effect of glycemic control and type of diabetes treatment on TB treatment outcomes among people with TB-diabetes: A systematic review (updated August 2024).
title_full Effect of glycemic control and type of diabetes treatment on TB treatment outcomes among people with TB-diabetes: A systematic review (updated August 2024).
title_fullStr Effect of glycemic control and type of diabetes treatment on TB treatment outcomes among people with TB-diabetes: A systematic review (updated August 2024).
title_full_unstemmed Effect of glycemic control and type of diabetes treatment on TB treatment outcomes among people with TB-diabetes: A systematic review (updated August 2024).
title_short Effect of glycemic control and type of diabetes treatment on TB treatment outcomes among people with TB-diabetes: A systematic review (updated August 2024).
title_sort effect of glycemic control and type of diabetes treatment on tb treatment outcomes among people with tb diabetes a systematic review updated august 2024
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328619
work_keys_str_mv AT hemantdeepakshewade effectofglycemiccontrolandtypeofdiabetestreatmentontbtreatmentoutcomesamongpeoplewithtbdiabetesasystematicreviewupdatedaugust2024
AT prabhadeviravichandran effectofglycemiccontrolandtypeofdiabetestreatmentontbtreatmentoutcomesamongpeoplewithtbdiabetesasystematicreviewupdatedaugust2024
AT ssatish effectofglycemiccontrolandtypeofdiabetestreatmentontbtreatmentoutcomesamongpeoplewithtbdiabetesasystematicreviewupdatedaugust2024
AT skiranpradeep effectofglycemiccontrolandtypeofdiabetestreatmentontbtreatmentoutcomesamongpeoplewithtbdiabetesasystematicreviewupdatedaugust2024
AT kathiresanjeyashree effectofglycemiccontrolandtypeofdiabetestreatmentontbtreatmentoutcomesamongpeoplewithtbdiabetesasystematicreviewupdatedaugust2024
AT preetammahajan effectofglycemiccontrolandtypeofdiabetestreatmentontbtreatmentoutcomesamongpeoplewithtbdiabetesasystematicreviewupdatedaugust2024
AT amarnshah effectofglycemiccontrolandtypeofdiabetestreatmentontbtreatmentoutcomesamongpeoplewithtbdiabetesasystematicreviewupdatedaugust2024
AT richardkirubakaran effectofglycemiccontrolandtypeofdiabetestreatmentontbtreatmentoutcomesamongpeoplewithtbdiabetesasystematicreviewupdatedaugust2024
AT ajaymvkumar effectofglycemiccontrolandtypeofdiabetestreatmentontbtreatmentoutcomesamongpeoplewithtbdiabetesasystematicreviewupdatedaugust2024