Long-term outcomes of initial thoracic endovascular repair versus medical therapy in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: real-world evidence from a nationwide claims database in Japan – a retrospective cohort study

Objectives To compare the long-term outcomes of initial thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) versus initial medical therapy (iMT) in patients with acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD), using real-world evidence from a nationwide claims database in Japan. This study aligns with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naohiro Yonemoto, Yuki Kimura, Hiroshi Ohtsu, Nobuyoshi Azuma, Kazuhiro Sase
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2025-08-01
Series:BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies
Online Access:https://sit.bmj.com/content/7/1/e000361.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849340552547401728
author Naohiro Yonemoto
Yuki Kimura
Hiroshi Ohtsu
Nobuyoshi Azuma
Kazuhiro Sase
author_facet Naohiro Yonemoto
Yuki Kimura
Hiroshi Ohtsu
Nobuyoshi Azuma
Kazuhiro Sase
author_sort Naohiro Yonemoto
collection DOAJ
description Objectives To compare the long-term outcomes of initial thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) versus initial medical therapy (iMT) in patients with acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD), using real-world evidence from a nationwide claims database in Japan. This study aligns with stage 4 of the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long-term Study (IDEAL) framework for surgical innovation.Design A retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching (PSM) to balance baseline characteristics.Setting Japanese nationwide health insurance claims database, between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2023.Participants Among 40 229 cases with tentative codes for aortic dissection (International Classification of Diseases-10: I71.0), 4995 met all eligibility criteria for acute uTBAD. Among these patients, 96 underwent TEVAR in the subacute phase (15–90 days post diagnosis), while 4899 were managed with iMT. After PSM, 96 TEVAR cases were matched to 480 iMT cases in a 1:5 ratio.Main outcome measures The primary outcomes were aorta-related events and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was the frequency of follow-up CT imaging every year.Results After PSM, the baseline characteristics of both groups were balanced. Median age was 56 years (IQR: 50–62 years) in both groups, and follow-up duration was similar (TEVAR: 31 months; iMT: 28 months, p=0.84).At 60 months, Kaplan-Meier estimates showed an aorta-related event rate of 21.9% (95% CI: 12.6% to 36.4%) for TEVAR and 19.9% (95% CI: 15.6% to 25.2%) for iMT (p=0.99).All-cause mortality was 4.4% (95% CI: 1.4% to 13.6%) for TEVAR and 6.6% (95% CI: 4.0% to 10.6%) for iMT (p=0.70). No significant differences were observed.Conclusions While aorta-related events accumulated steadily in the crude iMT group, no survival benefit was observed for subacute TEVAR. These findings support ongoing randomized controlled trials and show the utility of claims-based analyses in IDEAL Stage 4.
format Article
id doaj-art-abe69d3fc38d40149c44b87a98e9596d
institution Kabale University
issn 2631-4940
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies
spelling doaj-art-abe69d3fc38d40149c44b87a98e9596d2025-08-20T03:43:52ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies2631-49402025-08-017110.1136/bmjsit-2024-000361Long-term outcomes of initial thoracic endovascular repair versus medical therapy in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: real-world evidence from a nationwide claims database in Japan – a retrospective cohort studyNaohiro Yonemoto0Yuki Kimura1Hiroshi Ohtsu2Nobuyoshi Azuma3Kazuhiro Sase4Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, JapanClinical Pharmacology and Regulatory Science, Juntendo University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, JapanFaculty of Health Data Science, Juntendo University, Urayasu-city, JapanDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Midorigaoka higashi Asahikawa, JapanClinical Pharmacology and Regulatory Science, Juntendo University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, JapanObjectives To compare the long-term outcomes of initial thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) versus initial medical therapy (iMT) in patients with acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD), using real-world evidence from a nationwide claims database in Japan. This study aligns with stage 4 of the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long-term Study (IDEAL) framework for surgical innovation.Design A retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching (PSM) to balance baseline characteristics.Setting Japanese nationwide health insurance claims database, between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2023.Participants Among 40 229 cases with tentative codes for aortic dissection (International Classification of Diseases-10: I71.0), 4995 met all eligibility criteria for acute uTBAD. Among these patients, 96 underwent TEVAR in the subacute phase (15–90 days post diagnosis), while 4899 were managed with iMT. After PSM, 96 TEVAR cases were matched to 480 iMT cases in a 1:5 ratio.Main outcome measures The primary outcomes were aorta-related events and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was the frequency of follow-up CT imaging every year.Results After PSM, the baseline characteristics of both groups were balanced. Median age was 56 years (IQR: 50–62 years) in both groups, and follow-up duration was similar (TEVAR: 31 months; iMT: 28 months, p=0.84).At 60 months, Kaplan-Meier estimates showed an aorta-related event rate of 21.9% (95% CI: 12.6% to 36.4%) for TEVAR and 19.9% (95% CI: 15.6% to 25.2%) for iMT (p=0.99).All-cause mortality was 4.4% (95% CI: 1.4% to 13.6%) for TEVAR and 6.6% (95% CI: 4.0% to 10.6%) for iMT (p=0.70). No significant differences were observed.Conclusions While aorta-related events accumulated steadily in the crude iMT group, no survival benefit was observed for subacute TEVAR. These findings support ongoing randomized controlled trials and show the utility of claims-based analyses in IDEAL Stage 4.https://sit.bmj.com/content/7/1/e000361.full
spellingShingle Naohiro Yonemoto
Yuki Kimura
Hiroshi Ohtsu
Nobuyoshi Azuma
Kazuhiro Sase
Long-term outcomes of initial thoracic endovascular repair versus medical therapy in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: real-world evidence from a nationwide claims database in Japan – a retrospective cohort study
BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies
title Long-term outcomes of initial thoracic endovascular repair versus medical therapy in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: real-world evidence from a nationwide claims database in Japan – a retrospective cohort study
title_full Long-term outcomes of initial thoracic endovascular repair versus medical therapy in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: real-world evidence from a nationwide claims database in Japan – a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Long-term outcomes of initial thoracic endovascular repair versus medical therapy in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: real-world evidence from a nationwide claims database in Japan – a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Long-term outcomes of initial thoracic endovascular repair versus medical therapy in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: real-world evidence from a nationwide claims database in Japan – a retrospective cohort study
title_short Long-term outcomes of initial thoracic endovascular repair versus medical therapy in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: real-world evidence from a nationwide claims database in Japan – a retrospective cohort study
title_sort long term outcomes of initial thoracic endovascular repair versus medical therapy in acute uncomplicated type b aortic dissection real world evidence from a nationwide claims database in japan a retrospective cohort study
url https://sit.bmj.com/content/7/1/e000361.full
work_keys_str_mv AT naohiroyonemoto longtermoutcomesofinitialthoracicendovascularrepairversusmedicaltherapyinacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionrealworldevidencefromanationwideclaimsdatabaseinjapanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yukikimura longtermoutcomesofinitialthoracicendovascularrepairversusmedicaltherapyinacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionrealworldevidencefromanationwideclaimsdatabaseinjapanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hiroshiohtsu longtermoutcomesofinitialthoracicendovascularrepairversusmedicaltherapyinacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionrealworldevidencefromanationwideclaimsdatabaseinjapanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT nobuyoshiazuma longtermoutcomesofinitialthoracicendovascularrepairversusmedicaltherapyinacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionrealworldevidencefromanationwideclaimsdatabaseinjapanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kazuhirosase longtermoutcomesofinitialthoracicendovascularrepairversusmedicaltherapyinacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionrealworldevidencefromanationwideclaimsdatabaseinjapanaretrospectivecohortstudy