Factors Contributing to Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal Failure using Advanced Techniques: A Single-Center Study
Purpose To investigate the factors contributing to inferior vena cava (IVC) filter removal failure by comparing successful and failed cases using advanced techniques. Materials and Methods IVC filter removal was attempted in 331 patients. Of the 29 patients in whom IVC filter removal failed using...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Korean Society of Radiology
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2024.0046 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832576358505512960 |
---|---|
author | Hyeong Ryun Cho Young Min Han Hong Pil Hwang |
author_facet | Hyeong Ryun Cho Young Min Han Hong Pil Hwang |
author_sort | Hyeong Ryun Cho |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Purpose To investigate the factors contributing to inferior vena cava (IVC) filter removal failure
by comparing successful and failed cases using advanced techniques.
Materials and Methods IVC filter removal was attempted in 331 patients. Of the 29 patients
in whom IVC filter removal failed using a simple technique, the IVC filter was successfully
removed using an advanced technique in 18 patients and failure was noted in 11 patients.
Age, sex, filter type, indwelling period, IVC diameter, tilting angle between the IVC and the
filter, IVC wall penetration of the filter strut, and whether the filter was embedded or endothelialized
within the IVC wall were compared in each group.
Results Overall, there were 13 men (72%) in the success group and 3 men (27%) in the failure
group; more women were present in the failure group (p = 0.027). Unlike in the success
group, hook embedment (9/11, 82%) or IVC filter endothelialization (2/11, 18%) within the
wall of the IVC were observed in the failure group using two-dimensional venography.
Conclusion When using advanced techniques for IVC filter removal, females are at a higher
risk of failure compared to males. Hook embedment and IVC filter endothelialization within
the IVC wall, rather than penetration of the IVC wall, are crucial factors in failure of IVC filter
removal using advanced techniques. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-abbbb989fcfa43e7b72bfba4fbffc0d8 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2951-0805 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Radiology |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology |
spelling | doaj-art-abbbb989fcfa43e7b72bfba4fbffc0d82025-01-31T07:28:52ZengThe Korean Society of RadiologyJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology2951-08052025-01-01861105113https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2024.0046Factors Contributing to Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal Failure using Advanced Techniques: A Single-Center StudyHyeong Ryun ChoYoung Min HanHong Pil HwangPurpose To investigate the factors contributing to inferior vena cava (IVC) filter removal failure by comparing successful and failed cases using advanced techniques. Materials and Methods IVC filter removal was attempted in 331 patients. Of the 29 patients in whom IVC filter removal failed using a simple technique, the IVC filter was successfully removed using an advanced technique in 18 patients and failure was noted in 11 patients. Age, sex, filter type, indwelling period, IVC diameter, tilting angle between the IVC and the filter, IVC wall penetration of the filter strut, and whether the filter was embedded or endothelialized within the IVC wall were compared in each group. Results Overall, there were 13 men (72%) in the success group and 3 men (27%) in the failure group; more women were present in the failure group (p = 0.027). Unlike in the success group, hook embedment (9/11, 82%) or IVC filter endothelialization (2/11, 18%) within the wall of the IVC were observed in the failure group using two-dimensional venography. Conclusion When using advanced techniques for IVC filter removal, females are at a higher risk of failure compared to males. Hook embedment and IVC filter endothelialization within the IVC wall, rather than penetration of the IVC wall, are crucial factors in failure of IVC filter removal using advanced techniques.https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2024.0046ivc filteradvanced techniqueretrieverdeep vein thrombosis |
spellingShingle | Hyeong Ryun Cho Young Min Han Hong Pil Hwang Factors Contributing to Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal Failure using Advanced Techniques: A Single-Center Study Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology ivc filter advanced technique retriever deep vein thrombosis |
title | Factors Contributing to Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal Failure using Advanced Techniques: A Single-Center Study |
title_full | Factors Contributing to Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal Failure using Advanced Techniques: A Single-Center Study |
title_fullStr | Factors Contributing to Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal Failure using Advanced Techniques: A Single-Center Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors Contributing to Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal Failure using Advanced Techniques: A Single-Center Study |
title_short | Factors Contributing to Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal Failure using Advanced Techniques: A Single-Center Study |
title_sort | factors contributing to inferior vena cava filter removal failure using advanced techniques a single center study |
topic | ivc filter advanced technique retriever deep vein thrombosis |
url | https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2024.0046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hyeongryuncho factorscontributingtoinferiorvenacavafilterremovalfailureusingadvancedtechniquesasinglecenterstudy AT youngminhan factorscontributingtoinferiorvenacavafilterremovalfailureusingadvancedtechniquesasinglecenterstudy AT hongpilhwang factorscontributingtoinferiorvenacavafilterremovalfailureusingadvancedtechniquesasinglecenterstudy |