A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Implicit Stigma Toward People with Mental Illness Among Different Groups: Measurement, Extent, and Correlates

Yila Ren, Sheng Wang, Xiangqi Fu, Xiuxiu Shi School of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Xiuxiu Shi, School of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, No. 2318 Yu Hang Tang Road, Cangqian Street, Yuhang District, Zhejiang, 311121, People’s Republic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ren Y, Wang S, Fu X, Shi X
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2025-04-01
Series:Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis-of-implicit-stigma-toward-people-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-PRBM
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850151806002266112
author Ren Y
Wang S
Fu X
Shi X
author_facet Ren Y
Wang S
Fu X
Shi X
author_sort Ren Y
collection DOAJ
description Yila Ren, Sheng Wang, Xiangqi Fu, Xiuxiu Shi School of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Xiuxiu Shi, School of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, No. 2318 Yu Hang Tang Road, Cangqian Street, Yuhang District, Zhejiang, 311121, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-571-28861973, Email 20230069@hznu.edu.cnIntroduction: Implicit association tests have been extensively applied to reveal socially unacceptable and concealed stigma. Studies have explored the implicit stigma toward mental illness in specific groups, with limited comparisons across different groups. To investigate the implicit stigma toward mental illness among different groups, along with the interaction between implicit and explicit measurements.Methods: Based on PRISMA guidelines, Web of Science, Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were searched from 1998 to April 18, 2024. Searches were updated through February 12, 2025. The Medical Education Research Quality Instrument (MERSQI) served as the quality evaluation framework, and Stata 12.0 facilitated the conduct of a meta-analysis.Results: The analysis included fifty studies in the systematic review and thirty in the meta-analysis. Most studies used “mental illness” or related physical illness terms as concept words, paired with emotionally contrasting attribute words. Twenty-eight studies calculated the implicit effect using an improved algorithm, while thirty-eight examined the correlations between implicit and explicit measures. The pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) revealed that the lowest D scores were observed in the general population (SMD = 0.79, P < 0.001), followed by healthcare providers (SMD = 1.09, P = 0.054), students (SMD = 1.17, P < 0.001) and people with mental illness (SMD = 1.20, P < 0.001).Conclusion: The findings indicated that the selection of concept and attribute words, as well as the processing of data measuring implicit stigma, was not standardized. No reliable correlation was found between implicit and explicit measures. Despite the heterogeneity of included studies, the general public demonstrated the most positive attitudes, while individuals with mental illness exhibited negative attitudes. Further research is required to develop personalized anti-stigma interventions for different groups and regions based on these results, particularly from the perspective of implicit stigma.Keywords: mental illness, implicit stigma, implicit association test, systematic review, meta-analysis
format Article
id doaj-art-abb49bd50dea4969a1e1d9f77794e105
institution OA Journals
issn 1179-1578
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Psychology Research and Behavior Management
spelling doaj-art-abb49bd50dea4969a1e1d9f77794e1052025-08-20T02:26:07ZengDove Medical PressPsychology Research and Behavior Management1179-15782025-04-01Volume 18851875101844A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Implicit Stigma Toward People with Mental Illness Among Different Groups: Measurement, Extent, and CorrelatesRen YWang SFu XShi XYila Ren, Sheng Wang, Xiangqi Fu, Xiuxiu Shi School of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Xiuxiu Shi, School of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, No. 2318 Yu Hang Tang Road, Cangqian Street, Yuhang District, Zhejiang, 311121, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-571-28861973, Email 20230069@hznu.edu.cnIntroduction: Implicit association tests have been extensively applied to reveal socially unacceptable and concealed stigma. Studies have explored the implicit stigma toward mental illness in specific groups, with limited comparisons across different groups. To investigate the implicit stigma toward mental illness among different groups, along with the interaction between implicit and explicit measurements.Methods: Based on PRISMA guidelines, Web of Science, Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were searched from 1998 to April 18, 2024. Searches were updated through February 12, 2025. The Medical Education Research Quality Instrument (MERSQI) served as the quality evaluation framework, and Stata 12.0 facilitated the conduct of a meta-analysis.Results: The analysis included fifty studies in the systematic review and thirty in the meta-analysis. Most studies used “mental illness” or related physical illness terms as concept words, paired with emotionally contrasting attribute words. Twenty-eight studies calculated the implicit effect using an improved algorithm, while thirty-eight examined the correlations between implicit and explicit measures. The pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) revealed that the lowest D scores were observed in the general population (SMD = 0.79, P < 0.001), followed by healthcare providers (SMD = 1.09, P = 0.054), students (SMD = 1.17, P < 0.001) and people with mental illness (SMD = 1.20, P < 0.001).Conclusion: The findings indicated that the selection of concept and attribute words, as well as the processing of data measuring implicit stigma, was not standardized. No reliable correlation was found between implicit and explicit measures. Despite the heterogeneity of included studies, the general public demonstrated the most positive attitudes, while individuals with mental illness exhibited negative attitudes. Further research is required to develop personalized anti-stigma interventions for different groups and regions based on these results, particularly from the perspective of implicit stigma.Keywords: mental illness, implicit stigma, implicit association test, systematic review, meta-analysishttps://www.dovepress.com/a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis-of-implicit-stigma-toward-people-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-PRBMmental illnessimplicit stigmaimplicit association testsystematic reviewmeta-analysis 
spellingShingle Ren Y
Wang S
Fu X
Shi X
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Implicit Stigma Toward People with Mental Illness Among Different Groups: Measurement, Extent, and Correlates
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
mental illness
implicit stigma
implicit association test
systematic review
meta-analysis 
title A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Implicit Stigma Toward People with Mental Illness Among Different Groups: Measurement, Extent, and Correlates
title_full A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Implicit Stigma Toward People with Mental Illness Among Different Groups: Measurement, Extent, and Correlates
title_fullStr A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Implicit Stigma Toward People with Mental Illness Among Different Groups: Measurement, Extent, and Correlates
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Implicit Stigma Toward People with Mental Illness Among Different Groups: Measurement, Extent, and Correlates
title_short A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Implicit Stigma Toward People with Mental Illness Among Different Groups: Measurement, Extent, and Correlates
title_sort systematic review and meta analysis of implicit stigma toward people with mental illness among different groups measurement extent and correlates
topic mental illness
implicit stigma
implicit association test
systematic review
meta-analysis 
url https://www.dovepress.com/a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis-of-implicit-stigma-toward-people-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-PRBM
work_keys_str_mv AT reny asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofimplicitstigmatowardpeoplewithmentalillnessamongdifferentgroupsmeasurementextentandcorrelates
AT wangs asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofimplicitstigmatowardpeoplewithmentalillnessamongdifferentgroupsmeasurementextentandcorrelates
AT fux asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofimplicitstigmatowardpeoplewithmentalillnessamongdifferentgroupsmeasurementextentandcorrelates
AT shix asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofimplicitstigmatowardpeoplewithmentalillnessamongdifferentgroupsmeasurementextentandcorrelates
AT reny systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofimplicitstigmatowardpeoplewithmentalillnessamongdifferentgroupsmeasurementextentandcorrelates
AT wangs systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofimplicitstigmatowardpeoplewithmentalillnessamongdifferentgroupsmeasurementextentandcorrelates
AT fux systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofimplicitstigmatowardpeoplewithmentalillnessamongdifferentgroupsmeasurementextentandcorrelates
AT shix systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofimplicitstigmatowardpeoplewithmentalillnessamongdifferentgroupsmeasurementextentandcorrelates