Defaults change choices, not minds: Practical and ethical benefits of brief educational boosts for water recycling acceptance
Although nudges have been shown to influence many choices, it is possible that nudging may also result in undesirable consequences compared to other choice architectures (e.g., educational boosts). Here, we present evidence of one such case involving recycled water acceptance. In two experiments, we...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297525000105/type/journal_article |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849683354075529216 |
|---|---|
| author | Braden Tanner Edward T. Cokely Adam Feltz |
| author_facet | Braden Tanner Edward T. Cokely Adam Feltz |
| author_sort | Braden Tanner |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Although nudges have been shown to influence many choices, it is possible that nudging may also result in undesirable consequences compared to other choice architectures (e.g., educational boosts). Here, we present evidence of one such case involving recycled water acceptance. In two experiments, we compared the effects of a popular nudge (i.e., defaults designed to increase acceptance) with an educational boost (e.g., a brief video designed to support informed decision making). Results revealed that both defaults and educational boosts substantially increased choices related to recycled water acceptance (e.g., >60% increase in enrollment in a hypothetical recycled water program across experiments). However, the educational boost also promoted choice-consistent effects on attitudes, intentions, and knowledge, while default nudges resulted in attitude inconsistency (e.g., expressing worry about recycled water; intending to protest and avoid water recycling). Results add to research on practical and ethical risks of nudging and the potential benefits of comparing the costs of nudges with other options. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ab7503988e5845b5a98ad9e045e7610f |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1930-2975 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Judgment and Decision Making |
| spelling | doaj-art-ab7503988e5845b5a98ad9e045e7610f2025-08-20T03:23:56ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752025-01-012010.1017/jdm.2025.10Defaults change choices, not minds: Practical and ethical benefits of brief educational boosts for water recycling acceptanceBraden Tanner0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2572-1360Edward T. Cokely1Adam Feltz2Department of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USADepartment of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USADepartment of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA Center for Applied Social Research, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USAAlthough nudges have been shown to influence many choices, it is possible that nudging may also result in undesirable consequences compared to other choice architectures (e.g., educational boosts). Here, we present evidence of one such case involving recycled water acceptance. In two experiments, we compared the effects of a popular nudge (i.e., defaults designed to increase acceptance) with an educational boost (e.g., a brief video designed to support informed decision making). Results revealed that both defaults and educational boosts substantially increased choices related to recycled water acceptance (e.g., >60% increase in enrollment in a hypothetical recycled water program across experiments). However, the educational boost also promoted choice-consistent effects on attitudes, intentions, and knowledge, while default nudges resulted in attitude inconsistency (e.g., expressing worry about recycled water; intending to protest and avoid water recycling). Results add to research on practical and ethical risks of nudging and the potential benefits of comparing the costs of nudges with other options.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297525000105/type/journal_articledecision makingeducational boostsdefault nudgechoice architectureethics |
| spellingShingle | Braden Tanner Edward T. Cokely Adam Feltz Defaults change choices, not minds: Practical and ethical benefits of brief educational boosts for water recycling acceptance Judgment and Decision Making decision making educational boosts default nudge choice architecture ethics |
| title | Defaults change choices, not minds: Practical and ethical benefits of brief educational boosts for water recycling acceptance |
| title_full | Defaults change choices, not minds: Practical and ethical benefits of brief educational boosts for water recycling acceptance |
| title_fullStr | Defaults change choices, not minds: Practical and ethical benefits of brief educational boosts for water recycling acceptance |
| title_full_unstemmed | Defaults change choices, not minds: Practical and ethical benefits of brief educational boosts for water recycling acceptance |
| title_short | Defaults change choices, not minds: Practical and ethical benefits of brief educational boosts for water recycling acceptance |
| title_sort | defaults change choices not minds practical and ethical benefits of brief educational boosts for water recycling acceptance |
| topic | decision making educational boosts default nudge choice architecture ethics |
| url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297525000105/type/journal_article |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bradentanner defaultschangechoicesnotmindspracticalandethicalbenefitsofbriefeducationalboostsforwaterrecyclingacceptance AT edwardtcokely defaultschangechoicesnotmindspracticalandethicalbenefitsofbriefeducationalboostsforwaterrecyclingacceptance AT adamfeltz defaultschangechoicesnotmindspracticalandethicalbenefitsofbriefeducationalboostsforwaterrecyclingacceptance |