Silent magnetic resonance angiography diagnostic value of intracranial unruptured aneurysms

Abstract Silent magnetic resonance angiography (S-MRA) is primarily utilized to assess the blood flow in aneurysms and parent vessels of treated intracranial aneurysms. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of S-MRA and three-dimensional time of flight (3D-TOF) MRA for unruptured intracra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bin Lv, Tingyang Zhang, Ning Wang, Lu Liu, Mingyu Li, Meng Li, Mingguang Sun, Xiao Zang, Xinfeng Liu, Rongju Zhang, Xiangyu Cao, Zhihua Du, Jun Wang, Jinhao Lyu, Xueyang Wang, Qi Duan, Fangfang Guo, Xin Lou, Chenglin Tian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87646-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Silent magnetic resonance angiography (S-MRA) is primarily utilized to assess the blood flow in aneurysms and parent vessels of treated intracranial aneurysms. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of S-MRA and three-dimensional time of flight (3D-TOF) MRA for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. We included patients diagnosed with unruptured intracranial aneurysms using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) who subsequently underwent S-MRA and 3D-TOF MRA. Two independent neuroimaging and neurointerventional doctors evaluated the DSA images and measured aneurysm dimensions. Using DSA results as the gold standard, we determined the sensitivity and specificity of S-MRA and 3D-TOF MRA, as well as their accuracy in measuring aneurysm size and identifying aneurysms with daughter sacs. We detected a total of 41 intracranial aneurysms (in 37 patients) on both S-MRA and 3D-TOF MRA, with both techniques achieving a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. For aneurysm height, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.977 (P < 0.001) between S-MRA and DSA, and 0.908 (P < 0.001) between 3D-TOF MRA and DSA. For neck width, the ICC was 0.663 (P < 0.001) between S-MRA and DSA, and 0.563 (P < 0.001) between 3D-TOF MRA and DSA. In terms of daughter aneurysm detection, 3D-TOF MRA Sensitivity 40%; specificity 92%: positive predictive value 100%; S-MRA sensitivity 60%; specificity 89%; positive predictive value 42%. In conclusion, S-MRA and 3D-TOF MRA did not significantly differ in aneurysm detection ability. For the detection of aneurysm with dauthger sacs indicators, the sensitivity is also higher.
ISSN:2045-2322