Experimental and numerical simulation of carbonation-induced corrosion in reinforced concretes

Despite the extensive research on carbonation-induced corrosion (CIC), there is still no consensus on the carbonation front location and the reinforcement corrosion onset. In addition, a reliable diffusion-reaction numerical simulation for quantitative prediction of carbonation depth seems to be lac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rasoul Banar, Faramarz Moodi, Ali Akbar Ramezanianpour, Amir Mohammad Ramezanianpour, Pooria Dashti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-07-01
Series:Case Studies in Construction Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214509525002621
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Despite the extensive research on carbonation-induced corrosion (CIC), there is still no consensus on the carbonation front location and the reinforcement corrosion onset. In addition, a reliable diffusion-reaction numerical simulation for quantitative prediction of carbonation depth seems to be lacking. In this study, normal and pozzolanic concretes, both with and without reinforcing, were exposed to 5 % CO2, 30 ℃, and 65 % RH for up to 12 months. A novel finite element method-based model was simulated using COMSOL Multiphysics software and validated by carbonation depth results of experimental data. Regarding half-cell potential results, consideration of the criterion of significant potential drop instead of the threshold values specified in ASTM C876 allows for determining the onset time of CIC. Among the surveyed approaches for corrosion onset, considering the critical carbonation depth led to a conservative prediction with an average error of about 41 %. However, the presented theoretical models provided a more reliable prediction with an average error of 18 %. By increasing the concrete cover thickness on the reinforcement bars from 1.5 to 2.5 cm, the average initiation time of CIC increased by approximately three times. The section loss rate of reinforcements in 8 % SF and 20 % GGBFS mixtures increased by about 49 % and 86 %, respectively, compared to the control mixture without SCMs.
ISSN:2214-5095