Transatlantic Coastal Community Voices on Floating Offshore Wind Farms With Artificial Reefs

ABSTRACT In the United States (US) and in France, offshore wind farms (OWFs) and floating offshore wind farms (FOWFs) have faced political concerns and, in some cases, strong stakeholder opposition. Respecting the views of local communities is critical for a socially responsible energy transition. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antoine Dubois, Alison Bates, Angela Lin, Franck Schoefs, Pierre‐Alexandre Mahieu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:Wind Energy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/we.70021
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849714892021432320
author Antoine Dubois
Alison Bates
Angela Lin
Franck Schoefs
Pierre‐Alexandre Mahieu
author_facet Antoine Dubois
Alison Bates
Angela Lin
Franck Schoefs
Pierre‐Alexandre Mahieu
author_sort Antoine Dubois
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT In the United States (US) and in France, offshore wind farms (OWFs) and floating offshore wind farms (FOWFs) have faced political concerns and, in some cases, strong stakeholder opposition. Respecting the views of local communities is critical for a socially responsible energy transition. The development of such projects should also minimize impacts on the environment. This study aimed to assess and compare US and French coastal communities' perceptions of OWFs and FOWFs and to understand how artificial reefs may affect attitudes towards FOWFs. In 2022, semi‐structured interviews were conducted with local people in the state of Maine (US) and in the Pays‐de‐la‐Loire region (France) near planned or existing floating offshore wind projects. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Overall, a remarkable similarity was found between the regions, where both American and French communities were generally supportive of OWFs, and FOWFs in particular. Most concerns were related to biodiversity impacts, economic impacts (fisheries and economics) or aesthetic impacts. Differences between countries were seen in secondary concerns such as noise impacts or maintenance issues. Artificial reefs were largely viewed positively, although people were skeptical about the benefits and concerned about material and cost. Artificial reefs did not change people's opinions about FOWFs, and instead, they reinforced attitudes of opponents and supporters. People showed strong agreement upon their confidence in scientific leadership for such future projects, expressing a need for collaboration between academic researchers, governments, private companies, and seafarers.
format Article
id doaj-art-ab5c72fb86ba4aaab5bca4a7ba5d4b46
institution DOAJ
issn 1095-4244
1099-1824
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wind Energy
spelling doaj-art-ab5c72fb86ba4aaab5bca4a7ba5d4b462025-08-20T03:13:33ZengWileyWind Energy1095-42441099-18242025-06-01286n/an/a10.1002/we.70021Transatlantic Coastal Community Voices on Floating Offshore Wind Farms With Artificial ReefsAntoine Dubois0Alison Bates1Angela Lin2Franck Schoefs3Pierre‐Alexandre Mahieu4ISOMer UR2160 Nantes Université Nantes FranceDepartment of Environmental Studies Colby College Waterville Maine USADepartment of Environmental Studies Colby College Waterville Maine USAISOMer UR2160 Nantes Université Nantes FranceLEMNA Nantes Université Nantes FranceABSTRACT In the United States (US) and in France, offshore wind farms (OWFs) and floating offshore wind farms (FOWFs) have faced political concerns and, in some cases, strong stakeholder opposition. Respecting the views of local communities is critical for a socially responsible energy transition. The development of such projects should also minimize impacts on the environment. This study aimed to assess and compare US and French coastal communities' perceptions of OWFs and FOWFs and to understand how artificial reefs may affect attitudes towards FOWFs. In 2022, semi‐structured interviews were conducted with local people in the state of Maine (US) and in the Pays‐de‐la‐Loire region (France) near planned or existing floating offshore wind projects. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Overall, a remarkable similarity was found between the regions, where both American and French communities were generally supportive of OWFs, and FOWFs in particular. Most concerns were related to biodiversity impacts, economic impacts (fisheries and economics) or aesthetic impacts. Differences between countries were seen in secondary concerns such as noise impacts or maintenance issues. Artificial reefs were largely viewed positively, although people were skeptical about the benefits and concerned about material and cost. Artificial reefs did not change people's opinions about FOWFs, and instead, they reinforced attitudes of opponents and supporters. People showed strong agreement upon their confidence in scientific leadership for such future projects, expressing a need for collaboration between academic researchers, governments, private companies, and seafarers.https://doi.org/10.1002/we.70021attitudesbiocolonizationenergyFrancepublic perceptionsUnited States
spellingShingle Antoine Dubois
Alison Bates
Angela Lin
Franck Schoefs
Pierre‐Alexandre Mahieu
Transatlantic Coastal Community Voices on Floating Offshore Wind Farms With Artificial Reefs
Wind Energy
attitudes
biocolonization
energy
France
public perceptions
United States
title Transatlantic Coastal Community Voices on Floating Offshore Wind Farms With Artificial Reefs
title_full Transatlantic Coastal Community Voices on Floating Offshore Wind Farms With Artificial Reefs
title_fullStr Transatlantic Coastal Community Voices on Floating Offshore Wind Farms With Artificial Reefs
title_full_unstemmed Transatlantic Coastal Community Voices on Floating Offshore Wind Farms With Artificial Reefs
title_short Transatlantic Coastal Community Voices on Floating Offshore Wind Farms With Artificial Reefs
title_sort transatlantic coastal community voices on floating offshore wind farms with artificial reefs
topic attitudes
biocolonization
energy
France
public perceptions
United States
url https://doi.org/10.1002/we.70021
work_keys_str_mv AT antoinedubois transatlanticcoastalcommunityvoicesonfloatingoffshorewindfarmswithartificialreefs
AT alisonbates transatlanticcoastalcommunityvoicesonfloatingoffshorewindfarmswithartificialreefs
AT angelalin transatlanticcoastalcommunityvoicesonfloatingoffshorewindfarmswithartificialreefs
AT franckschoefs transatlanticcoastalcommunityvoicesonfloatingoffshorewindfarmswithartificialreefs
AT pierrealexandremahieu transatlanticcoastalcommunityvoicesonfloatingoffshorewindfarmswithartificialreefs