Utopia and Intellectual Humility: More, Bacon and Swift Appraising Law and Technology

Law and frontier technologies have been variously perceived in Western literature’s early classic utopias. Utopias’ diverse narratives and commentaries have applauded law’s interplay with technology or admonished it – utopias have variously imagined technological progress or pitfalls. Recently, give...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Karen Schultz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Queensland University of Technology 2025-04-01
Series:Law, Technology and Humans
Subjects:
Online Access:https://lthj.qut.edu.au/article/view/3860
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850171994779156480
author Karen Schultz
author_facet Karen Schultz
author_sort Karen Schultz
collection DOAJ
description Law and frontier technologies have been variously perceived in Western literature’s early classic utopias. Utopias’ diverse narratives and commentaries have applauded law’s interplay with technology or admonished it – utopias have variously imagined technological progress or pitfalls. Recently, given frontier technologies’ risk profiles, it has been suggested that a counter of intellectual humility should accompany their operation. Yet, intellectual humility is not a new awareness – its value, connecting with law and technology’s interplay, is illustrated in select utopias in the early Western literary tradition. This article’s consideration of a trilogy of select utopias proceeds in three big-picture strokes. First, it considers the interplay and intertextual connections of law and technology in three of the earliest British fictions in utopia’s ‘imagined travellers’ mode: Thomas More’s Utopia (1516); Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis (1626); and Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels (1726). Second, this article recollects recent calls for ‘intellectual humility’ to accompany the development and operation of frontier technologies. However, intellectual humility lacks consensus – it can generally be expressed as reflecting approaches to measuring a sceptical mind that recognise fallibility and reject over-confidence. Third, each of the select utopias concerning law and technology’s interplay with intellectual humility is briefly considered. The texts are not straightforward: More, Bacon and Swift variously correlate the potential of human capacities with technological futures and offer various messages. While they extend optimistic reassurance that good judgment can exist, they offer pessimistic cautions – poor judgment on matters technological can bear terrible consequences. This article’s purpose is to deepen the discourse.
format Article
id doaj-art-ab1d7f731de543749ed4d31ce4e9b76f
institution OA Journals
issn 2652-4074
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Queensland University of Technology
record_format Article
series Law, Technology and Humans
spelling doaj-art-ab1d7f731de543749ed4d31ce4e9b76f2025-08-20T02:20:10ZengQueensland University of TechnologyLaw, Technology and Humans2652-40742025-04-017172110.5204/lthj.38604183Utopia and Intellectual Humility: More, Bacon and Swift Appraising Law and TechnologyKaren Schultz0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3225-4545Griffith Law School, Griffith UniversityLaw and frontier technologies have been variously perceived in Western literature’s early classic utopias. Utopias’ diverse narratives and commentaries have applauded law’s interplay with technology or admonished it – utopias have variously imagined technological progress or pitfalls. Recently, given frontier technologies’ risk profiles, it has been suggested that a counter of intellectual humility should accompany their operation. Yet, intellectual humility is not a new awareness – its value, connecting with law and technology’s interplay, is illustrated in select utopias in the early Western literary tradition. This article’s consideration of a trilogy of select utopias proceeds in three big-picture strokes. First, it considers the interplay and intertextual connections of law and technology in three of the earliest British fictions in utopia’s ‘imagined travellers’ mode: Thomas More’s Utopia (1516); Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis (1626); and Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels (1726). Second, this article recollects recent calls for ‘intellectual humility’ to accompany the development and operation of frontier technologies. However, intellectual humility lacks consensus – it can generally be expressed as reflecting approaches to measuring a sceptical mind that recognise fallibility and reject over-confidence. Third, each of the select utopias concerning law and technology’s interplay with intellectual humility is briefly considered. The texts are not straightforward: More, Bacon and Swift variously correlate the potential of human capacities with technological futures and offer various messages. While they extend optimistic reassurance that good judgment can exist, they offer pessimistic cautions – poor judgment on matters technological can bear terrible consequences. This article’s purpose is to deepen the discourse.https://lthj.qut.edu.au/article/view/3860utopialaw and technologythomas morefrancis baconjonathan swiftintellectual humility
spellingShingle Karen Schultz
Utopia and Intellectual Humility: More, Bacon and Swift Appraising Law and Technology
Law, Technology and Humans
utopia
law and technology
thomas more
francis bacon
jonathan swift
intellectual humility
title Utopia and Intellectual Humility: More, Bacon and Swift Appraising Law and Technology
title_full Utopia and Intellectual Humility: More, Bacon and Swift Appraising Law and Technology
title_fullStr Utopia and Intellectual Humility: More, Bacon and Swift Appraising Law and Technology
title_full_unstemmed Utopia and Intellectual Humility: More, Bacon and Swift Appraising Law and Technology
title_short Utopia and Intellectual Humility: More, Bacon and Swift Appraising Law and Technology
title_sort utopia and intellectual humility more bacon and swift appraising law and technology
topic utopia
law and technology
thomas more
francis bacon
jonathan swift
intellectual humility
url https://lthj.qut.edu.au/article/view/3860
work_keys_str_mv AT karenschultz utopiaandintellectualhumilitymorebaconandswiftappraisinglawandtechnology