Demythologising the Given: Schlick, Cornelius, and Adorno <i>contra</i> Husserl

After the attempt at collaboration between the Frankfurt School and the Vienna Circle failed in the late 1930s, Adorno stood at the forefront of critical theory’s polemics against ‘positivism’. Given these later polemical exchanges, some of the tendencies common to both movements have remained overl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andreas Vrahimis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-10-01
Series:Philosophies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/9/6/159
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850238422174662656
author Andreas Vrahimis
author_facet Andreas Vrahimis
author_sort Andreas Vrahimis
collection DOAJ
description After the attempt at collaboration between the Frankfurt School and the Vienna Circle failed in the late 1930s, Adorno stood at the forefront of critical theory’s polemics against ‘positivism’. Given these later polemical exchanges, some of the tendencies common to both movements have remained overlooked. Among these is their opposition to the phenomenological tradition. This paper focusses on certain features common to Schlick’s and Adorno’s critical responses to Husserl. The Machians, including Adorno’s supervisor Hans Cornelius, were targeted by Husserl’s onslaught against psychologism in 1900. The young Schlick’s Machian background had motivated his contribution to the <i>Psychologismusstreit</i>, in the context of which he launched a series of objections against Husserl’s ‘independence theory of truth’. Adorno’s later doctoral dissertation under Cornelius was also motivated by the effort to defend his master against Husserl’s objections. Schlick’s criticisms intensified in later works, where Husserl’s epistemology of intuition is seen as yet another instance of the widespread confusion between knowledge and acquaintance. Schlick’s warnings against Husserl’s turn towards the irrationalist fashions of his day find their echo in Adorno’s ‘Metakritik’. Apart from their broad agreement in how they understand Husserl’s positioning within his context, Schlick and Adorno also develop a similar criticism of Husserl’s account of intuition as failing in its aspiration to discover unmediated givenness, which it confuses with mediated conceptual knowledge. Unfortunately, while Adorno explicitly acknowledges Schlick’s critique of Husserl, he also misconstrues it as a scientistic rejection of metaphysical nonsense, thus failing to acknowledge the proximity to his approach.
format Article
id doaj-art-ab14c86e8f584fd1bfed1397d3de1b70
institution OA Journals
issn 2409-9287
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Philosophies
spelling doaj-art-ab14c86e8f584fd1bfed1397d3de1b702025-08-20T02:01:28ZengMDPI AGPhilosophies2409-92872024-10-019615910.3390/philosophies9060159Demythologising the Given: Schlick, Cornelius, and Adorno <i>contra</i> HusserlAndreas Vrahimis0Department of Classics and Philosophy, University of Cyprus, CY-1678 Nicosia, CyprusAfter the attempt at collaboration between the Frankfurt School and the Vienna Circle failed in the late 1930s, Adorno stood at the forefront of critical theory’s polemics against ‘positivism’. Given these later polemical exchanges, some of the tendencies common to both movements have remained overlooked. Among these is their opposition to the phenomenological tradition. This paper focusses on certain features common to Schlick’s and Adorno’s critical responses to Husserl. The Machians, including Adorno’s supervisor Hans Cornelius, were targeted by Husserl’s onslaught against psychologism in 1900. The young Schlick’s Machian background had motivated his contribution to the <i>Psychologismusstreit</i>, in the context of which he launched a series of objections against Husserl’s ‘independence theory of truth’. Adorno’s later doctoral dissertation under Cornelius was also motivated by the effort to defend his master against Husserl’s objections. Schlick’s criticisms intensified in later works, where Husserl’s epistemology of intuition is seen as yet another instance of the widespread confusion between knowledge and acquaintance. Schlick’s warnings against Husserl’s turn towards the irrationalist fashions of his day find their echo in Adorno’s ‘Metakritik’. Apart from their broad agreement in how they understand Husserl’s positioning within his context, Schlick and Adorno also develop a similar criticism of Husserl’s account of intuition as failing in its aspiration to discover unmediated givenness, which it confuses with mediated conceptual knowledge. Unfortunately, while Adorno explicitly acknowledges Schlick’s critique of Husserl, he also misconstrues it as a scientistic rejection of metaphysical nonsense, thus failing to acknowledge the proximity to his approach.https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/9/6/159HusserlPsychologismusstreitLogical EmpiricismFrankfurt SchoolintuitionSchlick
spellingShingle Andreas Vrahimis
Demythologising the Given: Schlick, Cornelius, and Adorno <i>contra</i> Husserl
Philosophies
Husserl
Psychologismusstreit
Logical Empiricism
Frankfurt School
intuition
Schlick
title Demythologising the Given: Schlick, Cornelius, and Adorno <i>contra</i> Husserl
title_full Demythologising the Given: Schlick, Cornelius, and Adorno <i>contra</i> Husserl
title_fullStr Demythologising the Given: Schlick, Cornelius, and Adorno <i>contra</i> Husserl
title_full_unstemmed Demythologising the Given: Schlick, Cornelius, and Adorno <i>contra</i> Husserl
title_short Demythologising the Given: Schlick, Cornelius, and Adorno <i>contra</i> Husserl
title_sort demythologising the given schlick cornelius and adorno i contra i husserl
topic Husserl
Psychologismusstreit
Logical Empiricism
Frankfurt School
intuition
Schlick
url https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/9/6/159
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasvrahimis demythologisingthegivenschlickcorneliusandadornoicontraihusserl