Coil optimization methods for a planar coil stellarator

The planar coil stellarator design is a novel approach to producing the confining magnetic field of a stellarator plasma. The work presented here details the optimization of the two types of planar coils that are used in the planar coil design: the plasma encircling coils, and the shaping coils. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T.G. Kruger, M.F. Martin, D.A. Gates, the Thea Energy Team
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2025-01-01
Series:Nuclear Fusion
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ada56b
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583497006448640
author T.G. Kruger
M.F. Martin
D.A. Gates
the Thea Energy Team
author_facet T.G. Kruger
M.F. Martin
D.A. Gates
the Thea Energy Team
author_sort T.G. Kruger
collection DOAJ
description The planar coil stellarator design is a novel approach to producing the confining magnetic field of a stellarator plasma. The work presented here details the optimization of the two types of planar coils that are used in the planar coil design: the plasma encircling coils, and the shaping coils. The plasma encircling coils provide the mean magnetic field and linking current, similar to the toroidal field (TF) coils in a tokamak. The plasma encircling coils can be rotationally symmetric TF-like coils and produce a $B\propto 1/R$ field, but optimizing their placement, tilt, and shaping can substantially reduce the magnetic field error. In addition, an array of dipole-like shaping coils, that lie on a surface between the plasma boundary and the encircling coils, correct for the residual magnetic field error following encircling coil optimization. As a proof-of-concept, it is shown that by optimizing both types of coils, subject to realistic engineering constraints, reasonable magnetic field errors of ∼1% have been achieved. Comparison to a traditional modular coil set reveals that similarly low magnetic field errors can be attained with the planar coil stellarator.
format Article
id doaj-art-ab0aa7c0f81c437c9dd29cd1ac7ae259
institution Kabale University
issn 0029-5515
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Nuclear Fusion
spelling doaj-art-ab0aa7c0f81c437c9dd29cd1ac7ae2592025-01-28T12:14:49ZengIOP PublishingNuclear Fusion0029-55152025-01-0165202605110.1088/1741-4326/ada56bCoil optimization methods for a planar coil stellaratorT.G. Kruger0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1462-3033M.F. Martin1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2032-2894D.A. Gates2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5679-3124the Thea Energy Team3Thea Energy , Kearny, NJ 07032, United States of AmericaThea Energy , Kearny, NJ 07032, United States of AmericaThea Energy , Kearny, NJ 07032, United States of AmericaThea Energy , Kearny, NJ 07032, United States of AmericaThe planar coil stellarator design is a novel approach to producing the confining magnetic field of a stellarator plasma. The work presented here details the optimization of the two types of planar coils that are used in the planar coil design: the plasma encircling coils, and the shaping coils. The plasma encircling coils provide the mean magnetic field and linking current, similar to the toroidal field (TF) coils in a tokamak. The plasma encircling coils can be rotationally symmetric TF-like coils and produce a $B\propto 1/R$ field, but optimizing their placement, tilt, and shaping can substantially reduce the magnetic field error. In addition, an array of dipole-like shaping coils, that lie on a surface between the plasma boundary and the encircling coils, correct for the residual magnetic field error following encircling coil optimization. As a proof-of-concept, it is shown that by optimizing both types of coils, subject to realistic engineering constraints, reasonable magnetic field errors of ∼1% have been achieved. Comparison to a traditional modular coil set reveals that similarly low magnetic field errors can be attained with the planar coil stellarator.https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ada56bThea energystellaratorsplanar coil stellaratorcoil optimizationplanar coils
spellingShingle T.G. Kruger
M.F. Martin
D.A. Gates
the Thea Energy Team
Coil optimization methods for a planar coil stellarator
Nuclear Fusion
Thea energy
stellarators
planar coil stellarator
coil optimization
planar coils
title Coil optimization methods for a planar coil stellarator
title_full Coil optimization methods for a planar coil stellarator
title_fullStr Coil optimization methods for a planar coil stellarator
title_full_unstemmed Coil optimization methods for a planar coil stellarator
title_short Coil optimization methods for a planar coil stellarator
title_sort coil optimization methods for a planar coil stellarator
topic Thea energy
stellarators
planar coil stellarator
coil optimization
planar coils
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ada56b
work_keys_str_mv AT tgkruger coiloptimizationmethodsforaplanarcoilstellarator
AT mfmartin coiloptimizationmethodsforaplanarcoilstellarator
AT dagates coiloptimizationmethodsforaplanarcoilstellarator
AT thetheaenergyteam coiloptimizationmethodsforaplanarcoilstellarator