Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Aspergillus niger strain AS 29‐286

Abstract The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Aspergillus niger strain AS 29‐286 by Shin Nihon Chemical Co., Ltd. The food enzyme is considered free from viable cells of the production organism. It is intended to be used...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP), Claude Lambré, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Riccardo Crebelli, David Michael Gott, Konrad Grob, Evgenia Lampi, Marcel Mengelers, Alicja Mortensen, Gilles Rivière, Inger‐Lise Steffensen, Christina Tlustos, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Holger Zorn, Jaime Aguilera, Magdalena Andryszkiewicz, Ana Criado, Cristina Fernandez‐Fraguas, Yi Liu, Elsa Nielsen, Karin Nørby, Giulio diPiazza, Andrew Chesson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-06-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8090
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850210420195852288
author EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP)
Claude Lambré
José Manuel Barat Baviera
Claudia Bolognesi
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Riccardo Crebelli
David Michael Gott
Konrad Grob
Evgenia Lampi
Marcel Mengelers
Alicja Mortensen
Gilles Rivière
Inger‐Lise Steffensen
Christina Tlustos
Henk Van Loveren
Laurence Vernis
Holger Zorn
Jaime Aguilera
Magdalena Andryszkiewicz
Ana Criado
Cristina Fernandez‐Fraguas
Yi Liu
Elsa Nielsen
Karin Nørby
Giulio diPiazza
Andrew Chesson
author_facet EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP)
Claude Lambré
José Manuel Barat Baviera
Claudia Bolognesi
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Riccardo Crebelli
David Michael Gott
Konrad Grob
Evgenia Lampi
Marcel Mengelers
Alicja Mortensen
Gilles Rivière
Inger‐Lise Steffensen
Christina Tlustos
Henk Van Loveren
Laurence Vernis
Holger Zorn
Jaime Aguilera
Magdalena Andryszkiewicz
Ana Criado
Cristina Fernandez‐Fraguas
Yi Liu
Elsa Nielsen
Karin Nørby
Giulio diPiazza
Andrew Chesson
author_sort EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP)
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Aspergillus niger strain AS 29‐286 by Shin Nihon Chemical Co., Ltd. The food enzyme is considered free from viable cells of the production organism. It is intended to be used in seven food manufacturing processes: baking processes, fruit and vegetable processing for juice production, fruit and vegetable processing for products other than juices, distilled alcohol production, starch processing for the production of maltodextrins, brewing processes and non‐wine vinegar production. Since residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed during distilled alcohol production and starch processing for the production of maltodextrins, dietary exposure was calculated only for the remaining five food manufacturing processes. It was estimated to be up to 2.158 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not indicate a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1,774 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, resulted in a margin of exposure of at least 822. A search for the similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and four matches with respiratory allergens were found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.
format Article
id doaj-art-ab0a0827119142bba670003da30b539b
institution OA Journals
issn 1831-4732
language English
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series EFSA Journal
spelling doaj-art-ab0a0827119142bba670003da30b539b2025-08-20T02:09:47ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322023-06-01216n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8090Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Aspergillus niger strain AS 29‐286EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP)Claude LambréJosé Manuel Barat BavieraClaudia BolognesiPier Sandro CocconcelliRiccardo CrebelliDavid Michael GottKonrad GrobEvgenia LampiMarcel MengelersAlicja MortensenGilles RivièreInger‐Lise SteffensenChristina TlustosHenk Van LoverenLaurence VernisHolger ZornJaime AguileraMagdalena AndryszkiewiczAna CriadoCristina Fernandez‐FraguasYi LiuElsa NielsenKarin NørbyGiulio diPiazzaAndrew ChessonAbstract The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Aspergillus niger strain AS 29‐286 by Shin Nihon Chemical Co., Ltd. The food enzyme is considered free from viable cells of the production organism. It is intended to be used in seven food manufacturing processes: baking processes, fruit and vegetable processing for juice production, fruit and vegetable processing for products other than juices, distilled alcohol production, starch processing for the production of maltodextrins, brewing processes and non‐wine vinegar production. Since residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed during distilled alcohol production and starch processing for the production of maltodextrins, dietary exposure was calculated only for the remaining five food manufacturing processes. It was estimated to be up to 2.158 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not indicate a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1,774 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, resulted in a margin of exposure of at least 822. A search for the similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and four matches with respiratory allergens were found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8090food enzymeα‐amylase4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolaseEC 3.2.1.1glycogenaseAspergillus niger
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP)
Claude Lambré
José Manuel Barat Baviera
Claudia Bolognesi
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Riccardo Crebelli
David Michael Gott
Konrad Grob
Evgenia Lampi
Marcel Mengelers
Alicja Mortensen
Gilles Rivière
Inger‐Lise Steffensen
Christina Tlustos
Henk Van Loveren
Laurence Vernis
Holger Zorn
Jaime Aguilera
Magdalena Andryszkiewicz
Ana Criado
Cristina Fernandez‐Fraguas
Yi Liu
Elsa Nielsen
Karin Nørby
Giulio diPiazza
Andrew Chesson
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Aspergillus niger strain AS 29‐286
EFSA Journal
food enzyme
α‐amylase
4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase
EC 3.2.1.1
glycogenase
Aspergillus niger
title Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Aspergillus niger strain AS 29‐286
title_full Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Aspergillus niger strain AS 29‐286
title_fullStr Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Aspergillus niger strain AS 29‐286
title_full_unstemmed Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Aspergillus niger strain AS 29‐286
title_short Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Aspergillus niger strain AS 29‐286
title_sort safety evaluation of the food enzyme α amylase from the non genetically modified aspergillus niger strain as 29 286
topic food enzyme
α‐amylase
4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase
EC 3.2.1.1
glycogenase
Aspergillus niger
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8090
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelonfoodcontactmaterialsenzymesandprocessingaidscep safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT claudelambre safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT josemanuelbaratbaviera safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT claudiabolognesi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT piersandrococconcelli safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT riccardocrebelli safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT davidmichaelgott safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT konradgrob safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT evgenialampi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT marcelmengelers safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT alicjamortensen safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT gillesriviere safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT ingerlisesteffensen safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT christinatlustos safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT henkvanloveren safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT laurencevernis safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT holgerzorn safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT jaimeaguilera safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT magdalenaandryszkiewicz safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT anacriado safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT cristinafernandezfraguas safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT yiliu safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT elsanielsen safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT karinnørby safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT giuliodipiazza safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286
AT andrewchesson safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedaspergillusnigerstrainas29286