Caesarean section between doctrine to heresis. Medicoethical and deontological view of caesarology: an opinion
Increasing the incidence of caesarean section is not in line with professional and deontological guidelines. Elective cesarean section prevents primordial prevention of chronic cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, imunological, endocrinological morbidity by peripartal programming. Elective non-medical...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IMR Press
2021-02-01
|
| Series: | Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.imrpress.com/journal/CEOG/48/1/10.31083/j.ceog.2021.01.2305 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850171916507152384 |
|---|---|
| author | Dubravko Habek Matija Prka Anto Čartolovni Anis Cerovac Domagoj Dokozić |
| author_facet | Dubravko Habek Matija Prka Anto Čartolovni Anis Cerovac Domagoj Dokozić |
| author_sort | Dubravko Habek |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Increasing the incidence of caesarean section is not in line with professional and deontological guidelines. Elective cesarean section prevents primordial prevention of chronic cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, imunological, endocrinological morbidity by peripartal programming. Elective non-medical indicated caesarean section is not a procedure that respects deontological, clinical etics, scientific and professional principles. It is like an unacceptable surgery outside the scope of medical ethics. Clientelism in high-risk clinical obstetric medicine is not a professional and deontologically correct category: a physician should not be a provider on request of healthy pregnant women with the potential to have a medically incorrect procedure and complications associated with it and to put a healthy pregnant/maternity and child status in the patient’s status. The financial, social, political and cultural components must not outweigh good clinical practice and the moral principles of medicine. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ab0059d9281c4dde8aec5c19ff694d9e |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 0390-6663 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-02-01 |
| publisher | IMR Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology |
| spelling | doaj-art-ab0059d9281c4dde8aec5c19ff694d9e2025-08-20T02:20:12ZengIMR PressClinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology0390-66632021-02-014811410.31083/j.ceog.2021.01.2305S0390-6663(21)00036-1Caesarean section between doctrine to heresis. Medicoethical and deontological view of caesarology: an opinionDubravko Habek0Matija Prka1Anto Čartolovni2Anis Cerovac3Domagoj Dokozić4University Departement of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Hospital, “Sveti Duh” Zagreb, Croatian Catholic University Zagreb, Croatian Academy of Medical Sciences, 10000 Zagreb, CroatiaUniversity Departement of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Hospital, “Sveti Duh” Zagreb, Croatian Catholic University Zagreb, Croatian Academy of Medical Sciences, 10000 Zagreb, CroatiaDigital Healthcare Ethics Laboratory (Digit-Heal), Croatian Catholic University Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, CroatiaDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, General Hospital Tešanj, Tešanj, Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Tuzla, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and HerzegovinaGeneral Hospital Požega, 34000 Požega, CroatiaIncreasing the incidence of caesarean section is not in line with professional and deontological guidelines. Elective cesarean section prevents primordial prevention of chronic cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, imunological, endocrinological morbidity by peripartal programming. Elective non-medical indicated caesarean section is not a procedure that respects deontological, clinical etics, scientific and professional principles. It is like an unacceptable surgery outside the scope of medical ethics. Clientelism in high-risk clinical obstetric medicine is not a professional and deontologically correct category: a physician should not be a provider on request of healthy pregnant women with the potential to have a medically incorrect procedure and complications associated with it and to put a healthy pregnant/maternity and child status in the patient’s status. The financial, social, political and cultural components must not outweigh good clinical practice and the moral principles of medicine.https://www.imrpress.com/journal/CEOG/48/1/10.31083/j.ceog.2021.01.2305caesarean sectionelective caesarean sectionnon-medical indicated caesarean sectionmedical ethicsclinical eticsdeontology |
| spellingShingle | Dubravko Habek Matija Prka Anto Čartolovni Anis Cerovac Domagoj Dokozić Caesarean section between doctrine to heresis. Medicoethical and deontological view of caesarology: an opinion Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology caesarean section elective caesarean section non-medical indicated caesarean section medical ethics clinical etics deontology |
| title | Caesarean section between doctrine to heresis. Medicoethical and deontological view of caesarology: an opinion |
| title_full | Caesarean section between doctrine to heresis. Medicoethical and deontological view of caesarology: an opinion |
| title_fullStr | Caesarean section between doctrine to heresis. Medicoethical and deontological view of caesarology: an opinion |
| title_full_unstemmed | Caesarean section between doctrine to heresis. Medicoethical and deontological view of caesarology: an opinion |
| title_short | Caesarean section between doctrine to heresis. Medicoethical and deontological view of caesarology: an opinion |
| title_sort | caesarean section between doctrine to heresis medicoethical and deontological view of caesarology an opinion |
| topic | caesarean section elective caesarean section non-medical indicated caesarean section medical ethics clinical etics deontology |
| url | https://www.imrpress.com/journal/CEOG/48/1/10.31083/j.ceog.2021.01.2305 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dubravkohabek caesareansectionbetweendoctrinetoheresismedicoethicalanddeontologicalviewofcaesarologyanopinion AT matijaprka caesareansectionbetweendoctrinetoheresismedicoethicalanddeontologicalviewofcaesarologyanopinion AT antocartolovni caesareansectionbetweendoctrinetoheresismedicoethicalanddeontologicalviewofcaesarologyanopinion AT aniscerovac caesareansectionbetweendoctrinetoheresismedicoethicalanddeontologicalviewofcaesarologyanopinion AT domagojdokozic caesareansectionbetweendoctrinetoheresismedicoethicalanddeontologicalviewofcaesarologyanopinion |