Culture, budgeting and planning in the Department of Finance
This article considers the contribution of the Department of Finance from the late 1950s to the turn of the millennium. It revisits long-standing cultural and institutional issues that former officials and academics raised in the period, particularly focusing on the budgetary system and its weakness...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sciendo
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Administration |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2024-0028 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850283607907631104 |
|---|---|
| author | Casey Ciarán |
| author_facet | Casey Ciarán |
| author_sort | Casey Ciarán |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article considers the contribution of the Department of Finance from the late 1950s to the turn of the millennium. It revisits long-standing cultural and institutional issues that former officials and academics raised in the period, particularly focusing on the budgetary system and its weaknesses. It examines the limitations of the department’s foray into economic planning, arguing that its potential was never fully realised. The article argues that plans, rather than budgets, were a far more appropriate mechanism for setting economic policy, and that they could have helped mitigate the influence of party politics. It concludes that planning will become even more paramount in the twenty-first century, as Ireland grapples with major global headwinds. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-aad584c4bf9640c0aadadfed840f54ee |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2449-9471 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Sciendo |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Administration |
| spelling | doaj-art-aad584c4bf9640c0aadadfed840f54ee2025-08-20T01:47:45ZengSciendoAdministration2449-94712024-12-01724819610.2478/admin-2024-0028Culture, budgeting and planning in the Department of FinanceCasey Ciarán01Department of Economics, Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick, IrelandThis article considers the contribution of the Department of Finance from the late 1950s to the turn of the millennium. It revisits long-standing cultural and institutional issues that former officials and academics raised in the period, particularly focusing on the budgetary system and its weaknesses. It examines the limitations of the department’s foray into economic planning, arguing that its potential was never fully realised. The article argues that plans, rather than budgets, were a far more appropriate mechanism for setting economic policy, and that they could have helped mitigate the influence of party politics. It concludes that planning will become even more paramount in the twenty-first century, as Ireland grapples with major global headwinds.https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2024-0028budgetculturedepartment of financeirelandplanning |
| spellingShingle | Casey Ciarán Culture, budgeting and planning in the Department of Finance Administration budget culture department of finance ireland planning |
| title | Culture, budgeting and planning in the Department of Finance |
| title_full | Culture, budgeting and planning in the Department of Finance |
| title_fullStr | Culture, budgeting and planning in the Department of Finance |
| title_full_unstemmed | Culture, budgeting and planning in the Department of Finance |
| title_short | Culture, budgeting and planning in the Department of Finance |
| title_sort | culture budgeting and planning in the department of finance |
| topic | budget culture department of finance ireland planning |
| url | https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2024-0028 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT caseyciaran culturebudgetingandplanninginthedepartmentoffinance |