Effects of Deer Settling Stimulus and Deer Density on Regeneration in a Harvested Southern New England Forest

Elevated deer densities have led to reports of forest regeneration failure and ecological damage. However, there is growing evidence that the biophysical conditions of a forest that make it attractive to deer may be a contributing factor in determining browsing levels. Thus, an understanding of set...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin J. Barrett, Oswald J. Schmitz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-01-01
Series:International Journal of Forestry Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/690213
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832562898414600192
author Kevin J. Barrett
Oswald J. Schmitz
author_facet Kevin J. Barrett
Oswald J. Schmitz
author_sort Kevin J. Barrett
collection DOAJ
description Elevated deer densities have led to reports of forest regeneration failure and ecological damage. However, there is growing evidence that the biophysical conditions of a forest that make it attractive to deer may be a contributing factor in determining browsing levels. Thus, an understanding of settling stimulus—how attractive an area is to deer in terms of food-independent habitat requirements—is potentially important to manage deer browsing impacts. We tested the settling stimulus hypothesis by evaluating the degree to which thermal settling stimulus and deer density are related to spatial variation in browsing intensity across different forest harvesting strategies over the course of a year. We determined if deer were impacting plant communities and if they resulted in changes in plant cover. We quantified the thermal environment around each harvest and tested to see if it influenced deer density and browsing impact. We found that deer had an impact on the landscape but did not alter plant cover or diminish forest regeneration capacity. Deer density and browse impact had a relationship with thermal settling stimulus for summer and fall months, and deer density had a relationship with browse impact in the winter on woody plants. We conclude that thermal settling stimulus is an important predictor for deer density and browsing impact.
format Article
id doaj-art-aad47a7b2bae4a318623135daa5aec48
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-9368
1687-9376
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Forestry Research
spelling doaj-art-aad47a7b2bae4a318623135daa5aec482025-02-03T01:21:33ZengWileyInternational Journal of Forestry Research1687-93681687-93762013-01-01201310.1155/2013/690213690213Effects of Deer Settling Stimulus and Deer Density on Regeneration in a Harvested Southern New England ForestKevin J. Barrett0Oswald J. Schmitz1School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, Yale University, 370 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USASchool of Forestry & Environmental Studies, Yale University, 370 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USAElevated deer densities have led to reports of forest regeneration failure and ecological damage. However, there is growing evidence that the biophysical conditions of a forest that make it attractive to deer may be a contributing factor in determining browsing levels. Thus, an understanding of settling stimulus—how attractive an area is to deer in terms of food-independent habitat requirements—is potentially important to manage deer browsing impacts. We tested the settling stimulus hypothesis by evaluating the degree to which thermal settling stimulus and deer density are related to spatial variation in browsing intensity across different forest harvesting strategies over the course of a year. We determined if deer were impacting plant communities and if they resulted in changes in plant cover. We quantified the thermal environment around each harvest and tested to see if it influenced deer density and browsing impact. We found that deer had an impact on the landscape but did not alter plant cover or diminish forest regeneration capacity. Deer density and browse impact had a relationship with thermal settling stimulus for summer and fall months, and deer density had a relationship with browse impact in the winter on woody plants. We conclude that thermal settling stimulus is an important predictor for deer density and browsing impact.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/690213
spellingShingle Kevin J. Barrett
Oswald J. Schmitz
Effects of Deer Settling Stimulus and Deer Density on Regeneration in a Harvested Southern New England Forest
International Journal of Forestry Research
title Effects of Deer Settling Stimulus and Deer Density on Regeneration in a Harvested Southern New England Forest
title_full Effects of Deer Settling Stimulus and Deer Density on Regeneration in a Harvested Southern New England Forest
title_fullStr Effects of Deer Settling Stimulus and Deer Density on Regeneration in a Harvested Southern New England Forest
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Deer Settling Stimulus and Deer Density on Regeneration in a Harvested Southern New England Forest
title_short Effects of Deer Settling Stimulus and Deer Density on Regeneration in a Harvested Southern New England Forest
title_sort effects of deer settling stimulus and deer density on regeneration in a harvested southern new england forest
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/690213
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinjbarrett effectsofdeersettlingstimulusanddeerdensityonregenerationinaharvestedsouthernnewenglandforest
AT oswaldjschmitz effectsofdeersettlingstimulusanddeerdensityonregenerationinaharvestedsouthernnewenglandforest