Interested privies as participants of constitutional court proceedings: prospects of using foreign experience in Russian legislation

Subject. The article is devoted to analysis of some issues concerning realization of adversary principal in proceedings in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.Purpose. The purpose of the article is to analyze foreign experience of legal regulation of the status of constitutional court...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. V. Nikitina
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Dostoevsky Omsk State University 2018-04-01
Series:Правоприменение
Subjects:
Online Access:https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/149
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850041690409140224
author A. V. Nikitina
author_facet A. V. Nikitina
author_sort A. V. Nikitina
collection DOAJ
description Subject. The article is devoted to analysis of some issues concerning realization of adversary principal in proceedings in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.Purpose. The purpose of the article is to analyze foreign experience of legal regulation of the status of constitutional court process participants as parties and/or interested persons in constitutional court proceeding, to give arguments in favor of introducing the category of ‘interested privies’ in Russian legislation regulating constitutional court proceedings.Methodology. The author uses theoretical analysis as well as legal methods including formal legal analysis and the method of legal comparison.Results, scope of application. Law often does not specify the party opposing the claimant during the proceedings in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The need to introduce the adversary principal in such cases requires to introduce the category of ‘interested privies’, whose rights and duties may be affected during the case solution in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.The following persons and entities may become interested privies in Constitutional proceedingst: persons whose claims brought against the decision of intergovernmental body for protecting human rights and freedoms - in cases on possibility of executing the decision of intergovernmental body for protecting human rights and freedoms; the State Duma and the Council of Federation of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation as bodies participating in ratification of the treaty - in cases on the check of constitutional legitimacy of a treaty about accepting new subject into the Russian Federation; constitutional bodies and public offices whose constitutional legal status may be changed as a result of official interpretation of constitutional rules - in cases on interpreting the Constitution; the RF Central Election Committee - in cases on the check of constitutional legitimacy of an issue introduced for the referendum of the Russian Federation; the President of the Russian Federation (if the request comes from the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation); the State Duma, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, President of the Russian Federation - in cases on providing the ruling about the observance of the established rules public prosecution of the President of the Russian Federation for treason or another serious offence.Conclusions. The category ‘interested persons’ will enable to provide guarantee of fair trial in resolving constitutional court conflicts, if such category would be included into Russian legislation.
format Article
id doaj-art-aaafbb0663c449cca0e8dbf4a9545063
institution DOAJ
issn 2542-1514
2658-4050
language Russian
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher Dostoevsky Omsk State University
record_format Article
series Правоприменение
spelling doaj-art-aaafbb0663c449cca0e8dbf4a95450632025-08-20T02:55:44ZrusDostoevsky Omsk State UniversityПравоприменение2542-15142658-40502018-04-012112313210.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).123-132123Interested privies as participants of constitutional court proceedings: prospects of using foreign experience in Russian legislationA. V. Nikitina0Khabarovsk State University of Economics and Law, Khabarovsk, RussiaSubject. The article is devoted to analysis of some issues concerning realization of adversary principal in proceedings in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.Purpose. The purpose of the article is to analyze foreign experience of legal regulation of the status of constitutional court process participants as parties and/or interested persons in constitutional court proceeding, to give arguments in favor of introducing the category of ‘interested privies’ in Russian legislation regulating constitutional court proceedings.Methodology. The author uses theoretical analysis as well as legal methods including formal legal analysis and the method of legal comparison.Results, scope of application. Law often does not specify the party opposing the claimant during the proceedings in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The need to introduce the adversary principal in such cases requires to introduce the category of ‘interested privies’, whose rights and duties may be affected during the case solution in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.The following persons and entities may become interested privies in Constitutional proceedingst: persons whose claims brought against the decision of intergovernmental body for protecting human rights and freedoms - in cases on possibility of executing the decision of intergovernmental body for protecting human rights and freedoms; the State Duma and the Council of Federation of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation as bodies participating in ratification of the treaty - in cases on the check of constitutional legitimacy of a treaty about accepting new subject into the Russian Federation; constitutional bodies and public offices whose constitutional legal status may be changed as a result of official interpretation of constitutional rules - in cases on interpreting the Constitution; the RF Central Election Committee - in cases on the check of constitutional legitimacy of an issue introduced for the referendum of the Russian Federation; the President of the Russian Federation (if the request comes from the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation); the State Duma, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, President of the Russian Federation - in cases on providing the ruling about the observance of the established rules public prosecution of the President of the Russian Federation for treason or another serious offence.Conclusions. The category ‘interested persons’ will enable to provide guarantee of fair trial in resolving constitutional court conflicts, if such category would be included into Russian legislation.https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/149the constitutional court of the russian federationconstitutional legal disputesadversarial principlepublic interestsconstitutional court proceedinginterested privies
spellingShingle A. V. Nikitina
Interested privies as participants of constitutional court proceedings: prospects of using foreign experience in Russian legislation
Правоприменение
the constitutional court of the russian federation
constitutional legal disputes
adversarial principle
public interests
constitutional court proceeding
interested privies
title Interested privies as participants of constitutional court proceedings: prospects of using foreign experience in Russian legislation
title_full Interested privies as participants of constitutional court proceedings: prospects of using foreign experience in Russian legislation
title_fullStr Interested privies as participants of constitutional court proceedings: prospects of using foreign experience in Russian legislation
title_full_unstemmed Interested privies as participants of constitutional court proceedings: prospects of using foreign experience in Russian legislation
title_short Interested privies as participants of constitutional court proceedings: prospects of using foreign experience in Russian legislation
title_sort interested privies as participants of constitutional court proceedings prospects of using foreign experience in russian legislation
topic the constitutional court of the russian federation
constitutional legal disputes
adversarial principle
public interests
constitutional court proceeding
interested privies
url https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/149
work_keys_str_mv AT avnikitina interestedpriviesasparticipantsofconstitutionalcourtproceedingsprospectsofusingforeignexperienceinrussianlegislation