United Kingdom’s contribution to European research output in biomedical sciences: 2008–2017
Background: On 31 January 2020, the United Kingdom (UK) formally left the European Union (EU). Only a short transition period, until 31 December 2020, is available to negotiate collaborations for research in biomedical sciences and health care. Within the European scientific community, two opinions...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
European Association of Science Editors
2020-05-01
|
| Series: | European Science Editing |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ese.arphahub.com/article/51112/download/pdf/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850168809425469440 |
|---|---|
| author | Raoul Tan Eric Sijbrands |
| author_facet | Raoul Tan Eric Sijbrands |
| author_sort | Raoul Tan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: On 31 January 2020, the United Kingdom (UK) formally left the European Union (EU). Only a short transition period, until 31 December 2020, is available to negotiate collaborations for research in biomedical sciences and health care. Within the European scientific community, two opinions are common: 1) Brexit is an opportunity to obtain more funding at the expense of the departing British; and 2) UK colleagues should continue to collaborate in EU scientific efforts, including Horizon Europe and Erasmus+. To provide evidence for more informed negotiations, we sought to determine the contribution of the UK to EU’s research in biomedical sciences.Methods: We performed a macro level scientometric analysis to estimate the contribution of the UK and EU member states, including those associated with EU-funding (EU+) namely Albania, Armenia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Faroe Islands, Georgia, Iceland, Israel, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Norway, Serbia, Switzerland, Tunisia, Turkey, and Ukraine, to preclinical, clinical and health sciences. We searched the Web of Science database to count the total number of scientific publications and the top 1% most cited publications in the world between 2008 and 2017, calculated the performance efficiency by dividing the top 1% by the total number, and calculated the odds ratios to create a ranking of performance efficiency. We then compared the contribution of the UK to all the EU+ -based publications and the top 1% to the contributions of the ten EU member states with the largest biomedical research output and also compared the respective contributions to EU+ publications that resulted from collaborations with other regions in the world.Results: We found 2,991,016 biomedical publications from EU+ during 2008–2017, of which 19,019 (0.64%) were in the world’s top 1% of the most cited publications. The UK produced 665,467 (22.3%) of these publications and had over two and a half times more top 1% most cited publications than the EU+ (odds ratio 2.79, 95% CI 2.71–2.88, p< 0.001). The UK’s share in the EU+ co-publications with regions outside Europe ranged between 23.0% for the Arab League and 50.6% for Australia and New Zealand and its share of the top 1% ranged between 48.6% for the USA and Canada and 70.7% for the African Union.Conclusions: The UK contributed far more highly cited publications than the rest of the EU+ states and strongly contributed to European collaborations with the rest of the world during 2008–2017. This suggests that if the UK ceases to participate in EU scientific collaborations as a result of Brexit, the quantity and quality of EU’s research in biomedical sciences will be adversely affected. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-aaada19ec5fe4b6c9a054fa2d1afc4e1 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2518-3354 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-05-01 |
| publisher | European Association of Science Editors |
| record_format | Article |
| series | European Science Editing |
| spelling | doaj-art-aaada19ec5fe4b6c9a054fa2d1afc4e12025-08-20T02:20:52ZengEuropean Association of Science EditorsEuropean Science Editing2518-33542020-05-01461410.3897/ese.2020.e5111251112United Kingdom’s contribution to European research output in biomedical sciences: 2008–2017Raoul Tan0Eric Sijbrands1Erasmus MCErasmus MCBackground: On 31 January 2020, the United Kingdom (UK) formally left the European Union (EU). Only a short transition period, until 31 December 2020, is available to negotiate collaborations for research in biomedical sciences and health care. Within the European scientific community, two opinions are common: 1) Brexit is an opportunity to obtain more funding at the expense of the departing British; and 2) UK colleagues should continue to collaborate in EU scientific efforts, including Horizon Europe and Erasmus+. To provide evidence for more informed negotiations, we sought to determine the contribution of the UK to EU’s research in biomedical sciences.Methods: We performed a macro level scientometric analysis to estimate the contribution of the UK and EU member states, including those associated with EU-funding (EU+) namely Albania, Armenia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Faroe Islands, Georgia, Iceland, Israel, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Norway, Serbia, Switzerland, Tunisia, Turkey, and Ukraine, to preclinical, clinical and health sciences. We searched the Web of Science database to count the total number of scientific publications and the top 1% most cited publications in the world between 2008 and 2017, calculated the performance efficiency by dividing the top 1% by the total number, and calculated the odds ratios to create a ranking of performance efficiency. We then compared the contribution of the UK to all the EU+ -based publications and the top 1% to the contributions of the ten EU member states with the largest biomedical research output and also compared the respective contributions to EU+ publications that resulted from collaborations with other regions in the world.Results: We found 2,991,016 biomedical publications from EU+ during 2008–2017, of which 19,019 (0.64%) were in the world’s top 1% of the most cited publications. The UK produced 665,467 (22.3%) of these publications and had over two and a half times more top 1% most cited publications than the EU+ (odds ratio 2.79, 95% CI 2.71–2.88, p< 0.001). The UK’s share in the EU+ co-publications with regions outside Europe ranged between 23.0% for the Arab League and 50.6% for Australia and New Zealand and its share of the top 1% ranged between 48.6% for the USA and Canada and 70.7% for the African Union.Conclusions: The UK contributed far more highly cited publications than the rest of the EU+ states and strongly contributed to European collaborations with the rest of the world during 2008–2017. This suggests that if the UK ceases to participate in EU scientific collaborations as a result of Brexit, the quantity and quality of EU’s research in biomedical sciences will be adversely affected.https://ese.arphahub.com/article/51112/download/pdf/Biomedical research in EUBrexitresearch collab |
| spellingShingle | Raoul Tan Eric Sijbrands United Kingdom’s contribution to European research output in biomedical sciences: 2008–2017 European Science Editing Biomedical research in EU Brexit research collab |
| title | United Kingdom’s contribution to European research output in biomedical sciences: 2008–2017 |
| title_full | United Kingdom’s contribution to European research output in biomedical sciences: 2008–2017 |
| title_fullStr | United Kingdom’s contribution to European research output in biomedical sciences: 2008–2017 |
| title_full_unstemmed | United Kingdom’s contribution to European research output in biomedical sciences: 2008–2017 |
| title_short | United Kingdom’s contribution to European research output in biomedical sciences: 2008–2017 |
| title_sort | united kingdom amp rsquo s contribution to european research output in biomedical sciences 2008 amp ndash 2017 |
| topic | Biomedical research in EU Brexit research collab |
| url | https://ese.arphahub.com/article/51112/download/pdf/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT raoultan unitedkingdomamprsquoscontributiontoeuropeanresearchoutputinbiomedicalsciences2008ampndash2017 AT ericsijbrands unitedkingdomamprsquoscontributiontoeuropeanresearchoutputinbiomedicalsciences2008ampndash2017 |