The new urban wastewater treatment directive from the perspective of the receiving rivers’ quality

Abstract Background The European Union is reformulating key water management directives: the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and the Water Framework Directive. The UWWTD update mandates extended removal of nutrients and stricter limits on micropollutants, primarily at wastewater treatme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Máté Krisztián Kardos, Miklós Patziger, Zsolt Jolánkai, Adrienne Clement
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-01-01
Series:Environmental Sciences Europe
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-024-01040-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832594924865847296
author Máté Krisztián Kardos
Miklós Patziger
Zsolt Jolánkai
Adrienne Clement
author_facet Máté Krisztián Kardos
Miklós Patziger
Zsolt Jolánkai
Adrienne Clement
author_sort Máté Krisztián Kardos
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The European Union is reformulating key water management directives: the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and the Water Framework Directive. The UWWTD update mandates extended removal of nutrients and stricter limits on micropollutants, primarily at wastewater treatment plants with a constructed capacity above 10 000 population equivalents. The revised Environmental Quality Standards Directive expands the list of regulated pollutants and lowers permissible concentrations for priority substances, including pharmaceuticals. The present study, applied for the Central-European country Hungary as a pilot, examines the impact of the UWWTD recast on receiving water quality. Employing a mixing model to assess the impact of municipal wastewater treatment plant emissions on regional waters, the research aims to optimize resource allocation for plant improvements and enhance risk area designation methods. Results Based on the evaluation of 886 river water bodies, it was found that wastewater plant effluents explain most of the current river impairment. Stricter nitrogen and phosphorus standards foreseen in the UWWTD recast will reduce the fraction of water bodies failing to achieve good ecological status by ~ 10%. The introduction of the new environmental quality standards for pharmaceuticals, in particular clarithromycin and diclofenac, will reveal that almost half of the river water bodies fail to achieve the good chemical status. Even after the implementation of micropollutant removal at the largest plants, as required by the recast, this number will not improve substantially. Conclusions The UWWTD recast’s stricter effluent standards for nutrients are projected to remarkably reduce the number of water bodies failing to achieve good ecological status, particularly in lowland rivers. However, the chemical status for pharmaceuticals like diclofenac remains concerning, with more than 40% of streams expected to fail under the revised limits. To overcome this, it is suggested to revise how the implementation of micropollutant removal at plants is prioritized. In addition to plant constructed capacity, the receiving water’s dilution capacity is to be considered at the prioritization and the designation of areas at risk.
format Article
id doaj-art-aa6e5ab97f6d4ca6a858b1e1cb5716f4
institution Kabale University
issn 2190-4715
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Environmental Sciences Europe
spelling doaj-art-aa6e5ab97f6d4ca6a858b1e1cb5716f42025-01-19T12:13:49ZengSpringerOpenEnvironmental Sciences Europe2190-47152025-01-0137111510.1186/s12302-024-01040-2The new urban wastewater treatment directive from the perspective of the receiving rivers’ qualityMáté Krisztián Kardos0Miklós Patziger1Zsolt Jolánkai2Adrienne Clement3Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and EconomicsDepartment of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and EconomicsDepartment of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and EconomicsDepartment of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and EconomicsAbstract Background The European Union is reformulating key water management directives: the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and the Water Framework Directive. The UWWTD update mandates extended removal of nutrients and stricter limits on micropollutants, primarily at wastewater treatment plants with a constructed capacity above 10 000 population equivalents. The revised Environmental Quality Standards Directive expands the list of regulated pollutants and lowers permissible concentrations for priority substances, including pharmaceuticals. The present study, applied for the Central-European country Hungary as a pilot, examines the impact of the UWWTD recast on receiving water quality. Employing a mixing model to assess the impact of municipal wastewater treatment plant emissions on regional waters, the research aims to optimize resource allocation for plant improvements and enhance risk area designation methods. Results Based on the evaluation of 886 river water bodies, it was found that wastewater plant effluents explain most of the current river impairment. Stricter nitrogen and phosphorus standards foreseen in the UWWTD recast will reduce the fraction of water bodies failing to achieve good ecological status by ~ 10%. The introduction of the new environmental quality standards for pharmaceuticals, in particular clarithromycin and diclofenac, will reveal that almost half of the river water bodies fail to achieve the good chemical status. Even after the implementation of micropollutant removal at the largest plants, as required by the recast, this number will not improve substantially. Conclusions The UWWTD recast’s stricter effluent standards for nutrients are projected to remarkably reduce the number of water bodies failing to achieve good ecological status, particularly in lowland rivers. However, the chemical status for pharmaceuticals like diclofenac remains concerning, with more than 40% of streams expected to fail under the revised limits. To overcome this, it is suggested to revise how the implementation of micropollutant removal at plants is prioritized. In addition to plant constructed capacity, the receiving water’s dilution capacity is to be considered at the prioritization and the designation of areas at risk.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-024-01040-2Point sources pollutionMunicipal wastewaterNitrogenPhosphorusMicropollutantsActive pharmaceutical ingredients
spellingShingle Máté Krisztián Kardos
Miklós Patziger
Zsolt Jolánkai
Adrienne Clement
The new urban wastewater treatment directive from the perspective of the receiving rivers’ quality
Environmental Sciences Europe
Point sources pollution
Municipal wastewater
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Micropollutants
Active pharmaceutical ingredients
title The new urban wastewater treatment directive from the perspective of the receiving rivers’ quality
title_full The new urban wastewater treatment directive from the perspective of the receiving rivers’ quality
title_fullStr The new urban wastewater treatment directive from the perspective of the receiving rivers’ quality
title_full_unstemmed The new urban wastewater treatment directive from the perspective of the receiving rivers’ quality
title_short The new urban wastewater treatment directive from the perspective of the receiving rivers’ quality
title_sort new urban wastewater treatment directive from the perspective of the receiving rivers quality
topic Point sources pollution
Municipal wastewater
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Micropollutants
Active pharmaceutical ingredients
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-024-01040-2
work_keys_str_mv AT matekrisztiankardos thenewurbanwastewatertreatmentdirectivefromtheperspectiveofthereceivingriversquality
AT miklospatziger thenewurbanwastewatertreatmentdirectivefromtheperspectiveofthereceivingriversquality
AT zsoltjolankai thenewurbanwastewatertreatmentdirectivefromtheperspectiveofthereceivingriversquality
AT adrienneclement thenewurbanwastewatertreatmentdirectivefromtheperspectiveofthereceivingriversquality
AT matekrisztiankardos newurbanwastewatertreatmentdirectivefromtheperspectiveofthereceivingriversquality
AT miklospatziger newurbanwastewatertreatmentdirectivefromtheperspectiveofthereceivingriversquality
AT zsoltjolankai newurbanwastewatertreatmentdirectivefromtheperspectiveofthereceivingriversquality
AT adrienneclement newurbanwastewatertreatmentdirectivefromtheperspectiveofthereceivingriversquality