Caesarean sections and private insurance: systematic review and meta-analysis
Objective Financial incentives associated with private insurance may encourage healthcare providers to perform more caesarean sections. We therefore sought to determine the association of private insurance and odds of caesarean section.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources MEDLINE,...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Ilir Hoxha, Medina Braha, Lamprini Syrogiannouli, David C Goodman, Peter Jüni, Bruno R da Costa |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017-08-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/8/e016600.full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Perinatal consequences of a category 1 caesarean section at term
by: Sailesh Kumar, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01) -
Erector spinae plane block in Caesarean sections: A scoping review
by: Kieran Brosnan, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Analysis of variation in charges and prices paid for vaginal and caesarean section births: a cross-sectional study
by: Renee Y Hsia, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Incidental Unilateral Tubal Absence Detected During Caesarean Section: Report of a Case
by: Selçuk Erkılınç, et al.
Published: (2014-04-01) -
Randomized controlled comparative study of anterior abdominal field block at linea semilunaris with a standard institutional regimen for postoperative analgesia in caesarean section: Post-operative caesarean section analgesia with abdominal field block
by: Sudhakar D.S., et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)