An interlaboratory comparison to quantify oxidative potential measurement in aerosol particles: challenges and recommendations for harmonisation
<p>This paper presents the findings from a collaborative interlaboratory comparison exercise designed to assess oxidative potential (OP) measurements conducted by 20 laboratories worldwide. This study represents an innovative effort as the first exercise specifically aimed at harmonising this...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
| Online Access: | https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/18/177/2025/amt-18-177-2025.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850122625692467200 |
|---|---|
| author | P. A. Dominutti J.-L. Jaffrezo A. Marsal T. Mhadhbi R. Elazzouzi C. Rak F. Cavalli J.-P. Putaud A. Bougiatioti N. Mihalopoulos N. Mihalopoulos D. Paraskevopoulou I. Mudway I. Mudway A. Nenes A. Nenes K. R. Daellenbach C. Banach S. J. Campbell H. Cigánková D. Contini G. Evans M. Georgopoulou M. Ghanem D. A. Glencross D. A. Glencross M. R. Guascito M. R. Guascito H. Herrmann S. Iram M. Jovanović M. Jovašević-Stojanović M. Kalberer I. M. Kooter S. E. Paulson A. Patel A. Patel A. Patel E. Perdrix M. C. Pietrogrande P. Mikuška J.-J. Sauvain K. Seitanidi P. Shahpoury E. J. d. S. Souza S. Steimer S. Steimer S. Stevanovic G. Suarez P. S. G. Subramanian B. Utinger M. F. van Os V. Verma X. Wang R. J. Weber Y. Yang X. Querol G. Hoek R. M. Harrison R. M. Harrison G. Uzu |
| author_facet | P. A. Dominutti J.-L. Jaffrezo A. Marsal T. Mhadhbi R. Elazzouzi C. Rak F. Cavalli J.-P. Putaud A. Bougiatioti N. Mihalopoulos N. Mihalopoulos D. Paraskevopoulou I. Mudway I. Mudway A. Nenes A. Nenes K. R. Daellenbach C. Banach S. J. Campbell H. Cigánková D. Contini G. Evans M. Georgopoulou M. Ghanem D. A. Glencross D. A. Glencross M. R. Guascito M. R. Guascito H. Herrmann S. Iram M. Jovanović M. Jovašević-Stojanović M. Kalberer I. M. Kooter S. E. Paulson A. Patel A. Patel A. Patel E. Perdrix M. C. Pietrogrande P. Mikuška J.-J. Sauvain K. Seitanidi P. Shahpoury E. J. d. S. Souza S. Steimer S. Steimer S. Stevanovic G. Suarez P. S. G. Subramanian B. Utinger M. F. van Os V. Verma X. Wang R. J. Weber Y. Yang X. Querol G. Hoek R. M. Harrison R. M. Harrison G. Uzu |
| author_sort | P. A. Dominutti |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>This paper presents the findings from a collaborative interlaboratory comparison exercise designed to assess oxidative potential (OP) measurements conducted by 20 laboratories worldwide. This study represents an innovative effort as the first exercise specifically aimed at harmonising this type of OP assay, setting a new benchmark in the field.</p>
<p>Over the last decade, there has been a noticeable increase in OP studies, with numerous research groups investigating the effects of exposure to air pollution particles through the evaluation of OP levels. However, the absence of standardised methods for OP measurements has resulted in variability in results across different groups, rendering meaningful comparisons challenging. To address this issue, this study engages in an international effort to compare OP measurements using a simplified method (with a dithiothreitol (DTT) assay).</p>
<p>Here, we quantify the OP in liquid samples to focus on the protocol measurement itself, while future international OP interlaboratory comparisons (ILCs) should aim to assess the whole chain process, including the sample extraction. We analyse the similarities and discrepancies observed in the results, identifying the critical parameters (such as the instrument used, the use of a simplified protocol, the delivery and analysis time) that could influence OP measurements and provide recommendations for future studies and interlaboratory comparisons even if other crucial aspects, such as sampling PM methods, sample storage, extraction methods and conditions, and the evaluation of other OP assays, still need to be standardised. This collaborative approach enhances the robustness of the OP DTT assay and paves the way for future studies to build on a unified framework. This pioneering work concludes that interlaboratory comparisons provide essential insights into the OP metric and are crucial to move toward the harmonisation of OP measurements.</p> |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-aa61ec0cf93045daad08dc923b039ef0 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1867-1381 1867-8548 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
| spelling | doaj-art-aa61ec0cf93045daad08dc923b039ef02025-08-20T02:34:47ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482025-01-011817719510.5194/amt-18-177-2025An interlaboratory comparison to quantify oxidative potential measurement in aerosol particles: challenges and recommendations for harmonisationP. A. Dominutti0J.-L. Jaffrezo1A. Marsal2T. Mhadhbi3R. Elazzouzi4C. Rak5F. Cavalli6J.-P. Putaud7A. Bougiatioti8N. Mihalopoulos9N. Mihalopoulos10D. Paraskevopoulou11I. Mudway12I. Mudway13A. Nenes14A. Nenes15K. R. Daellenbach16C. Banach17S. J. Campbell18H. Cigánková19D. Contini20G. Evans21M. Georgopoulou22M. Ghanem23D. A. Glencross24D. A. Glencross25M. R. Guascito26M. R. Guascito27H. Herrmann28S. Iram29M. Jovanović30M. Jovašević-Stojanović31M. Kalberer32I. M. Kooter33S. E. Paulson34A. Patel35A. Patel36A. Patel37E. Perdrix38M. C. Pietrogrande39P. Mikuška40J.-J. Sauvain41K. Seitanidi42P. Shahpoury43E. J. d. S. Souza44S. Steimer45S. Steimer46S. Stevanovic47G. Suarez48P. S. G. Subramanian49B. Utinger50M. F. van Os51V. Verma52X. Wang53R. J. Weber54Y. Yang55X. Querol56G. Hoek57R. M. Harrison58R. M. Harrison59G. Uzu60University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, INRAE, IRD, INP-G, IGE (UMR 5001), 38000 Grenoble, FranceUniversity Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, INRAE, IRD, INP-G, IGE (UMR 5001), 38000 Grenoble, FranceUniversity Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, INRAE, IRD, INP-G, IGE (UMR 5001), 38000 Grenoble, FranceUniversity Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, INRAE, IRD, INP-G, IGE (UMR 5001), 38000 Grenoble, FranceUniversity Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, INRAE, IRD, INP-G, IGE (UMR 5001), 38000 Grenoble, FranceUniversity Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, INRAE, IRD, INP-G, IGE (UMR 5001), 38000 Grenoble, FranceEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, ItalyEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, ItalyInstitute for Environmental Research and Sustainable Development, National Observatory of Athens, Lofos Koufou, P. Penteli, Athens, 15236, GreeceInstitute for Environmental Research and Sustainable Development, National Observatory of Athens, Lofos Koufou, P. Penteli, Athens, 15236, GreeceEnvironmental Chemical Processes Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Crete, Heraklion, 71003, GreeceInstitute for Environmental Research and Sustainable Development, National Observatory of Athens, Lofos Koufou, P. Penteli, Athens, 15236, GreeceMRC Centre for Environment and Health, Environmental Research Group, Imperial College London, 86 Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, UKNational Institute of Health Research, Health Protection Research Unit in Environmental Exposures and Health, Imperial College London, London, UKCenter for the Study of Air Quality and Climate Change, Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Patras, 26504, GreeceLaboratory of Atmospheric Processes and their Impacts, Institute of Environmental Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, SwitzerlandDepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California at Los Angeles, 520 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United StatesMRC Centre for Environment and Health, Environmental Research Group, Imperial College London, 86 Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, UKDepartment of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Analytical Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Veveří 97, 60200 Brno, Czech RepublicInstitute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, ISAC-CNR, Str. Prv. Lecce-Monteroni km 1.2, 73100 Lecce, ItalySouthern Ontario Centre for Atmospheric Aerosol Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5S 3E5, CanadaCenter for the Study of Air Quality and Climate Change, Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Patras, 26504, GreeceDepartment of Pollutant Metrology, Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité (INRS), 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, FranceMRC Centre for Environment and Health, Environmental Research Group, Imperial College London, 86 Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, UKNational Institute of Health Research, Health Protection Research Unit in Environmental Exposures and Health, Imperial College London, London, UKInstitute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, ISAC-CNR, Str. Prv. Lecce-Monteroni km 1.2, 73100 Lecce, ItalyDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies (DISTEBA), University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, ItalyAtmospheric Chemistry Department (ACD), Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research (TROPOS), Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, GermanySchool of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, 3216 Victoria, AustraliaVinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences – National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, 11 351 Belgrade, SerbiaVinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences – National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, 11 351 Belgrade, SerbiaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, SwitzerlandTNO Environmental Modelling, Sensing and Analysis, Princetonlaan 6-8, 3584 CB Utrecht, the NetherlandsDepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California at Los Angeles, 520 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United StatesDepartment of Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, 11418, SwedenBolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm, 11418, Swedennow at: Bagchi School of Public Health, Ahmedabad University, Ahmedabad 380009, Gujarat, IndiaIMT Nord Europe, Institut Mines-Télécom, Univ. Lille, Centre for Energy and Environment, 59000 Lille, FranceDepartment of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 17/19, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Analytical Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Veveří 97, 60200 Brno, Czech RepublicCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Occupational and Environment Health (DSTE), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, SwitzerlandCenter for the Study of Air Quality and Climate Change, Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Patras, 26504, GreeceEnvironmental and Life Sciences, Trent University, Peterborough, CanadaAtmospheric Chemistry Department (ACD), Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research (TROPOS), Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, GermanyDepartment of Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, 11418, SwedenBolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm, 11418, SwedenSchool of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, 3216 Victoria, AustraliaCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Occupational and Environment Health (DSTE), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, SwitzerlandDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 205 North Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, United StatesDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, SwitzerlandTNO Environmental Modelling, Sensing and Analysis, Princetonlaan 6-8, 3584 CB Utrecht, the NetherlandsDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 205 North Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, United StatesSouthern Ontario Centre for Atmospheric Aerosol Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5S 3E5, CanadaSchool of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United StatesSchool of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United StatesInstitute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), 08034 Barcelona, SpainInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584CM, the NetherlandsDivision of Environmental Health and Risk Management, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UKDepartment of Environmental Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaUniversity Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, INRAE, IRD, INP-G, IGE (UMR 5001), 38000 Grenoble, France<p>This paper presents the findings from a collaborative interlaboratory comparison exercise designed to assess oxidative potential (OP) measurements conducted by 20 laboratories worldwide. This study represents an innovative effort as the first exercise specifically aimed at harmonising this type of OP assay, setting a new benchmark in the field.</p> <p>Over the last decade, there has been a noticeable increase in OP studies, with numerous research groups investigating the effects of exposure to air pollution particles through the evaluation of OP levels. However, the absence of standardised methods for OP measurements has resulted in variability in results across different groups, rendering meaningful comparisons challenging. To address this issue, this study engages in an international effort to compare OP measurements using a simplified method (with a dithiothreitol (DTT) assay).</p> <p>Here, we quantify the OP in liquid samples to focus on the protocol measurement itself, while future international OP interlaboratory comparisons (ILCs) should aim to assess the whole chain process, including the sample extraction. We analyse the similarities and discrepancies observed in the results, identifying the critical parameters (such as the instrument used, the use of a simplified protocol, the delivery and analysis time) that could influence OP measurements and provide recommendations for future studies and interlaboratory comparisons even if other crucial aspects, such as sampling PM methods, sample storage, extraction methods and conditions, and the evaluation of other OP assays, still need to be standardised. This collaborative approach enhances the robustness of the OP DTT assay and paves the way for future studies to build on a unified framework. This pioneering work concludes that interlaboratory comparisons provide essential insights into the OP metric and are crucial to move toward the harmonisation of OP measurements.</p>https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/18/177/2025/amt-18-177-2025.pdf |
| spellingShingle | P. A. Dominutti J.-L. Jaffrezo A. Marsal T. Mhadhbi R. Elazzouzi C. Rak F. Cavalli J.-P. Putaud A. Bougiatioti N. Mihalopoulos N. Mihalopoulos D. Paraskevopoulou I. Mudway I. Mudway A. Nenes A. Nenes K. R. Daellenbach C. Banach S. J. Campbell H. Cigánková D. Contini G. Evans M. Georgopoulou M. Ghanem D. A. Glencross D. A. Glencross M. R. Guascito M. R. Guascito H. Herrmann S. Iram M. Jovanović M. Jovašević-Stojanović M. Kalberer I. M. Kooter S. E. Paulson A. Patel A. Patel A. Patel E. Perdrix M. C. Pietrogrande P. Mikuška J.-J. Sauvain K. Seitanidi P. Shahpoury E. J. d. S. Souza S. Steimer S. Steimer S. Stevanovic G. Suarez P. S. G. Subramanian B. Utinger M. F. van Os V. Verma X. Wang R. J. Weber Y. Yang X. Querol G. Hoek R. M. Harrison R. M. Harrison G. Uzu An interlaboratory comparison to quantify oxidative potential measurement in aerosol particles: challenges and recommendations for harmonisation Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
| title | An interlaboratory comparison to quantify oxidative potential measurement in aerosol particles: challenges and recommendations for harmonisation |
| title_full | An interlaboratory comparison to quantify oxidative potential measurement in aerosol particles: challenges and recommendations for harmonisation |
| title_fullStr | An interlaboratory comparison to quantify oxidative potential measurement in aerosol particles: challenges and recommendations for harmonisation |
| title_full_unstemmed | An interlaboratory comparison to quantify oxidative potential measurement in aerosol particles: challenges and recommendations for harmonisation |
| title_short | An interlaboratory comparison to quantify oxidative potential measurement in aerosol particles: challenges and recommendations for harmonisation |
| title_sort | interlaboratory comparison to quantify oxidative potential measurement in aerosol particles challenges and recommendations for harmonisation |
| url | https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/18/177/2025/amt-18-177-2025.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT padominutti aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT jljaffrezo aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT amarsal aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT tmhadhbi aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT relazzouzi aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT crak aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT fcavalli aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT jpputaud aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT abougiatioti aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT nmihalopoulos aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT nmihalopoulos aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT dparaskevopoulou aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT imudway aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT imudway aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT anenes aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT anenes aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT krdaellenbach aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT cbanach aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT sjcampbell aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT hcigankova aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT dcontini aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT gevans aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mgeorgopoulou aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mghanem aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT daglencross aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT daglencross aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mrguascito aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mrguascito aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT hherrmann aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT siram aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mjovanovic aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mjovasevicstojanovic aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mkalberer aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT imkooter aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT sepaulson aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT apatel aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT apatel aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT apatel aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT eperdrix aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mcpietrogrande aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT pmikuska aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT jjsauvain aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT kseitanidi aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT pshahpoury aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT ejdssouza aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT ssteimer aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT ssteimer aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT sstevanovic aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT gsuarez aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT psgsubramanian aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT butinger aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mfvanos aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT vverma aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT xwang aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT rjweber aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT yyang aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT xquerol aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT ghoek aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT rmharrison aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT rmharrison aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT guzu aninterlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT padominutti interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT jljaffrezo interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT amarsal interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT tmhadhbi interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT relazzouzi interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT crak interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT fcavalli interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT jpputaud interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT abougiatioti interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT nmihalopoulos interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT nmihalopoulos interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT dparaskevopoulou interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT imudway interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT imudway interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT anenes interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT anenes interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT krdaellenbach interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT cbanach interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT sjcampbell interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT hcigankova interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT dcontini interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT gevans interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mgeorgopoulou interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mghanem interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT daglencross interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT daglencross interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mrguascito interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mrguascito interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT hherrmann interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT siram interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mjovanovic interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mjovasevicstojanovic interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mkalberer interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT imkooter interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT sepaulson interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT apatel interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT apatel interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT apatel interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT eperdrix interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mcpietrogrande interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT pmikuska interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT jjsauvain interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT kseitanidi interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT pshahpoury interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT ejdssouza interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT ssteimer interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT ssteimer interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT sstevanovic interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT gsuarez interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT psgsubramanian interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT butinger interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT mfvanos interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT vverma interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT xwang interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT rjweber interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT yyang interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT xquerol interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT ghoek interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT rmharrison interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT rmharrison interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation AT guzu interlaboratorycomparisontoquantifyoxidativepotentialmeasurementinaerosolparticleschallengesandrecommendationsforharmonisation |