Pourquoi édite-t-on les philosophes « classiques » en France au XIXe siècle ?
French philosophers from the 19th century did not consider editorial tasks to be unedifying, nor indifferent to philosophical work itself. But political criteria are not sufficient to analyse them as actions. Editors did not only aim at distinguishing fiends and friends in an actualized history of p...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
2022-08-01
|
| Series: | Astérion |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/asterion/7872 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850264054821552128 |
|---|---|
| author | Félix Barancy |
| author_facet | Félix Barancy |
| author_sort | Félix Barancy |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | French philosophers from the 19th century did not consider editorial tasks to be unedifying, nor indifferent to philosophical work itself. But political criteria are not sufficient to analyse them as actions. Editors did not only aim at distinguishing fiends and friends in an actualized history of philosophy, they also assumed their work was philosophical in itself. The six papers of this dossier underline the singularity of philosophical edition as a philosophical practice in 19th century France. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-aa4abdf77ecb405cb12e03e65355df4c |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1762-6110 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
| publisher | École Normale Supérieure de Lyon |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Astérion |
| spelling | doaj-art-aa4abdf77ecb405cb12e03e65355df4c2025-08-20T01:54:49ZfraÉcole Normale Supérieure de LyonAstérion1762-61102022-08-012610.4000/asterion.7872Pourquoi édite-t-on les philosophes « classiques » en France au XIXe siècle ?Félix BarancyFrench philosophers from the 19th century did not consider editorial tasks to be unedifying, nor indifferent to philosophical work itself. But political criteria are not sufficient to analyse them as actions. Editors did not only aim at distinguishing fiends and friends in an actualized history of philosophy, they also assumed their work was philosophical in itself. The six papers of this dossier underline the singularity of philosophical edition as a philosophical practice in 19th century France.https://journals.openedition.org/asterion/7872reception studieshistory of editionsFrench philosophy from the 19th century |
| spellingShingle | Félix Barancy Pourquoi édite-t-on les philosophes « classiques » en France au XIXe siècle ? Astérion reception studies history of editions French philosophy from the 19th century |
| title | Pourquoi édite-t-on les philosophes « classiques » en France au XIXe siècle ? |
| title_full | Pourquoi édite-t-on les philosophes « classiques » en France au XIXe siècle ? |
| title_fullStr | Pourquoi édite-t-on les philosophes « classiques » en France au XIXe siècle ? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Pourquoi édite-t-on les philosophes « classiques » en France au XIXe siècle ? |
| title_short | Pourquoi édite-t-on les philosophes « classiques » en France au XIXe siècle ? |
| title_sort | pourquoi edite t on les philosophes classiques en france au xixe siecle |
| topic | reception studies history of editions French philosophy from the 19th century |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/asterion/7872 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT felixbarancy pourquoieditetonlesphilosophesclassiquesenfranceauxixesiecle |